5-0 Decision by Illinois Supreme Court to Dismiss Case

He obviously didn't read his second link. As for the lawyer's comment, all of them say that.

Case dismissed. You were and are wrong!

Keelai obviously can't comprehend what he reads.

All charges were dropped as per original agreement.

Second charges (double jeopardy) were dismissed by the Illinois Supreme Court. Null and void. Webb has egg on his face because he wrongfully bowed to public opinion and should never have recharged Smollet. Completely unconstitutional.

That sounds like a witch hunt only in the sense that authorities found the witch.

Your witch hunt continues. Give it a rest.

Well, on the plus side he was publicly humiliated, did some jail time, and his career is ruined. We gotta take whatever victories we can, I suppose.

"Everyone knows he faked a hate crime."

Lynch mob opinion. I already stated in other posts that the only evidence was the testimony of the two criminals who attacked him. That's like believing the rapist instead of the victim.

"he faked a hate crime."

You and some white people are overly emotional because you believe a black man accused white men of racism so YOU are taking it personally as if he called you a racist.

Upset and angry emotion fueled the lynch mob mentality.

Supreme Court made the right decision. Public opinion and pressure cannot be allowed to influence the judicial process. Smollet already paid a fine and served community service as per the agreement.

Case closed.

I'm right and you're wrong! Stop being a sore loser.

Exactly!

Who buys into this kind of logic? Is everyone who thinks and knows jussie is a guilty morally bankrupt dirt bag also a matt gaetz fan boy? gimme what you are smoking. You are talking nonsense Mr. Coates.

"conservatives think Matt Gaetz is "innocent until proven innocent" Hmmm. I haven't seen these claims. Can you support then with links from credible news sources? Reddit doesn't count.


"even though the courts disagree" He was ruled guilty in a court. The state Supreme Court stated he was guilty but overturned the conviction for a technicality. The court says he is still guilty, but the conviction was overturned. Numerous credible links above prove that.

Perhaps you don't understand the USA legal system as you claim to be Argentine.

Funny how Jussie is not Guilty because the courts say so, but Democrats still think Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty even though the courts ruled he acted in self defense. It’s almost as if you ignore all the context and pick sides based on political affiliation.

Btw Jussie Smollet WAS found guilty, and Matt Gaetz wasn’t even charged.

Neither have I heard of this guy before the story broke. I was just curious about the anger this case generated.

If you catch up, ask why were the two attackers never charged? What did they have to do or say not to be charged? IMHO, basing the entire case on the testimony of his attackers appears questionable to me. All the other "evidence" like wanting to buy a sandwich at a 24/7 open fast-food restaurant appear weak to me.

I have plenty of reasonable doubt.

Incredibly so, almost impossibly so.

Extremely so. And additionally, it's Chicago.