MovieChat Forums > Mike Tyson Discussion > The Reason Tyson Really Won

The Reason Tyson Really Won


An injured and slow 58-year-old Tyson was able to successfully go 8-rounds and defend against a 27-year-old desperately trying to knock him out.

reply

Both looked sloppy. Both got paid well which was the real goal.

The women's fight was incredible though.

reply

You are so right about the women's fight. I thought Taylor should have suffered more deductions for those "accidental" head butts.

reply

For sure

reply

Agreed I wasn't planning on watching the women's fight. Was pissed it started crashing and buffering at the 4th round compelling me to desperately try & restore the feed. I wouldn't have tried if not for them.

reply

And they had extra padded gloves too right?

reply

yeah, they were bigger gloves...would be like having pillows on your hands.

reply

I'm a year younger and can move much faster than Tyson did.

Meanwhile, if you watch Tyson duck he is so quick you could barely follow it. So, you mean to tell me his arms can't move as fast?

I don't believe it.

I think it was a fake exhibition fight for Paul.

I have never been a Tyson fan but he looked to be faking it.

reply

It was fought like an exhibition for sure, despite the fact it being marketed as a regular boxing match. It was a bad idea for Tyson to get into the ring, he needs to let that part of his life go. Jake Paul got nothing out of this, fighting a man that age no matter who they were. So he won, it was not impressive.

The whole thing was just a cash grab and whoever watched it live and paid to be in that arena hopefully regretted watching this joke of a match.

reply

But it shows Jake has the heart to go toe to toe with a legend.

Or at least that’s what Rocky Balboa’s ending narrative suggested

reply

Definitely an exhibition match between two men not at their peak. An injured older Tyson vs a guy too afraid to fight a boxer in his prime.

I just watched it for free twice on YouTube.

reply

I meant his legs were slow. He moved stiffly. Some type of knee injury? It didn't help that Paul was making Tyson follow him around the ring for the first 2-rounds. Tyson was clearly exhausted and breathing heavily by the final matches.

Tyson's arms used to be much faster. Tyson did a semi-good job defending himself against any major damage and it looked like Paul was repeatedly trying to find a way in, but couldn't.

As someone who can relate to age-related injury, loss of energy and stamina, I don't believe he was faking it. Growing old just sux.

Too bad Tyson couldn't knock him out in the 1st round, but Paul kept running away likely trying to tire him out which worked.

reply

What you ignored was his ducking ability, it was ultra fast.

Watch his training videos he was moving very quickly.

reply

I didn't ignore it. I thought that was very impressive throughout the fight. But, his legwork was horrible and sluggish. His punches have slowed down.

They compared the number of punches thrown and how many landed. Paul threw more punches and landed 3x more than Tyson.

I had already mentioned that Paul failed to get a knockout because of Tyson's defense.

reply

i was thinking the same , the way he ducked was really top level like waouh so fast so agile , but the way he barely tried to land punches was so weak , very shady...

reply

Tyson recently said he earned more losing than he ever did winning, so I think that was a hint for us.

reply

The match was obviously fixed.

Nobody wanted to injure the other.

reply

Keelai,

As one of the more intellectual posters on MC, I can’t help but wonder why you’re wasting time analyzing a boxing match. You could, instead, be commenting on my life-altering thread linked below which will provide insight to the correct way forward for the Democratic Party in order to prosper and win.

In case you forgot, I’m the old-school non-woke classic liberal (like Bill Maher) who you once referred to as MAGA racist and sexist in disguise.

Are you ready to apologize, and come clean about the error of your ways regarding the “woke” narrative in the midst of defeat?

https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/67377a018289de78b5bb54c7/White-Culture-and-Pride

reply

I believe boxing should have remained on commercial TV where all Americans could watch together instead of becoming a PPV event so this is the first boxing match I watched since the Mohammed Ali era thanks to a naughty youtuber who uploaded it.

Another topic of interest is the motive of showing Tyson's buttcheeks after the lockerroom interview. A classier interviewer would've cut the tape before he stood up. And what was the contraption he was wearing? And is it as uncomfortable as it looks?

reply

"Keelai, As one of the more intellectual posters on MC..."

Ta-Nehisi Coates complementing another Ta-Nehisi Coates.

reply

I don’t know who that is, but I looked it up, and, with regards to me, you are totally off the mark. I’m not a black supremacist. Perhaps Keelai is, and that’s why she’s obsessing about Mike Tyson’s asscheeks.

I believe in white supremacy, but I don’t want that to be included into law to discriminate. I’m just anti-woke, and think minority communities need to sink or swim, culturally, and more Democrats should take up that platform to defeat Trump. The era of affirmative action is done.

I also don’t consider Kamala Harris to have been a DEI hire. She was one of the best of our time, and you’d know that if you watched her destroy Trump in debate, and make Biden so uneasy in 2020 that he had to bring her on board.

Do you really believe her 74 million votes were all a bunch of Ta-Nihesi Coates fanatics?! smh F*ck you! lmao

reply

Bananas is racebaiting and you took the bait. I just want to discuss the Tyson fight.

reply

I got my racebaiting tactis by watching you Dad.

reply

But he didnt win though.

Come on now KKKeelai, you know what you really wanted to say is :

"An injured and slow BLACK 58-year-old Tyson was able to successfully go 8-rounds and defend against a WHITE 27-year-old desperately trying to knock him out."

reply

Everyone won.

It is absolutely shocking to me, I read yesterday, 65 million people watched this "fight".

One is astonished.

Why would anyone bother with this garbage?

But, hey, Tyson won, Paul won, NETFLIX won, not to mention future absurd "fights" won.

I imagine the next one will be PPV.

reply

True. Even I won since I always wanted to watch a Tyson fight and it finally happened - although not at his finest.

reply

He was at his apex from when he first came up in 1985 - until he beat Michael Spinks in 1988.

He wasn't just beating other fighters, he was destroying them. Looked like he would never lose. He won two more fights after Spinks, then came the absolutely shocking defeat at the hands of Buster Douglas.

From there it was a downward spiral. Ultimately he became a joke.

The only other person I know of that had a bigger downfall is OJ Simpson - that's how huge Tyson was in his heyday.

However, having said that, I'm glad you had the chance to see a Tyson fight, albeit a decrepit version of what he once was.

reply

Only the opponent wasn't desperately trying to knock him out. Jake Paul just let him be after the first few rounds once it was clear Mike was done and knackered. If Paul wanted to he could have ended the fight anywhere from about round 3 onwards.

But Tyson did win in the fact he got 20 million for pacing around a ring and barely throwing any punches for 16 minutes.

reply

Also, Tyson just announced he almost died in June and had a major recovery to accomplish so that puts his overall health during the match in question.

I want a rematch.

reply