I'm being really serious about this question....?

I'M IN YOUR HEAD DUDE. i WAS EXPECTING YOU TO POSSIBLY BE THE FIRST TOO REPLY, WITH A STATEMENT LIKE THAT. SO YOU AND OTHERS ARE LIKELY TO ASSUME I'M SPEAKING ABOUT MYSELF IN A COVERT WAY, LOL. ALL I HAVE TO SAY TO THAT IS "WRONG"!

Seriously, it doesn’t get much better than this. :)

SMALL BREASTS ARE BEST.

That's an interesting take. But breast size is different, as it can't enhance a sexual experience by feel really. Unless a man's really into breast play involving the penis lol. But I'm certain size does matter with a man, or there wouldn't be any debate over it. The funny thing I've learned, is that there I don't think there is a formal way of measuring the male endowment. I've heard some would measure starting at the rectum lol. Now how stupid is that? Or some measure from base too tip. Or that some measure the length of natural protrusion from the body. Both the latter methods make sense to me. But that's just measuring length. The width is another form of measurement. Regardless this is something that sucks about being male in a way. The reason I say that is because if anyone criticizes a man's size down there, especially a woman, I think, how could we throw it back on them as far as their tightness is concerned?

🫤

If that really happened like you said, I think perhaps they were both to eager to get it on. Meaning that there probably wasn't enough foreplay and lack of lube. I'm pretty sure no man's penis could have more girth than a babies head. And if a woman by nature has been designed to stretch enough to allow a baby to pass through the vaginal canal, I just don't see how it's possible, unless things were carelessly rushed. However, I'm sure it could be possible, as I've known of similar situations going down.