Note: I am not talking about children or any other underage people.
I'm most likely referring to animated characters (such as in anime and video games). They don't have the biggest tits or butt, but they have other wonderful physical features such as long pretty hair or cute outfits.
Is it bad to find such fictional characters attractive which are designed not to be sexualized?
you INCEL, pedo
FIRST! :D yes
I would contest the "not created for sex appeal" part.
99 times out of 100 times media knows EXACTLY what it is doing.
Tifa Lockhart has huuuuge tits.
https://images.app.goo.gl/RkvcXcBXCpXTWh4m7
https://images.app.goo.gl/XEvuJkDUkUhvyttr9
Signed, million man.
Years ao, there was a teaching computer program named Mavis Beacon, I recall guys having a cyber crush on the avator.
shareShe’s not bad, she’s just drawn that way:
https://media1.tenor.com/m/U1rpK0u3cC4AAAAd/jessica-rabbit-dress.gif
And yeah, I know she was created for MAXIMUM sex appeal, but a thread about sexy cartoon characters isn’t a thread about sexy cartoon characters until Jessica Rabbit hops in.
Ask Fourlemons and her pastor.
shareWillow in Buffy the Vampire Slayer was non sexualized for the first seasons anyway. I always liked her. There was "Fred" played by Amy Acker in Angel who was also non sexualized. It all depends on ones idea of not created for sex appeal I guess.
share