‘I AM A GAY MAN‘ - General Discussion Discussion

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Kowalski is now peddling a T-shirt that says:

I’M NOT GAY BUT NAKED MEN GIVE ME A ROCK HARD BONER

He’s trying to coax other gays out of the closet…

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/675a9b0bd758e1563386ddf3/AMAZING-T-SHIRT-FOR-ALL-THE-GUYS

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 2 months ago

🫂

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Big update on this.

Kowalski has revealed that he and equally woke user ‘KiwiJim’ are planning to take their friendship to the next level.

SheweeJim as he’s better known, has been an out and proud gay for years, and appointed himself spokesperson for the gay community here on Moviechat.

Kowalski, conversely, has been a raging closet case for years - aggressively flirting with straight men but gnashing his teeth whenever his homosexuality was pointed out to him.

Well it seems Shewee will be taking Kowalski under his wing and assuming a gay mentor role to the hungry young sexual predator.

This is a surpise move as the two were vying for the position of Head Sister (ever since Skavau ran away from this site after Trump’s resounding electoral victory), but now it appears they’ll be going ‘head to head’ in another sense…

Kowalski reveals more details here: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/675a9b0bd758e1563386ddf3/AMAZING-T-SHIRT-FOR-ALL-THE-GUYS?reply=6762d91f20094220841c7e54

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Christmas update.

Kowalski is now fully ‘out’ and openly discussing his favourite sexual positions:

MOSTLY FROM BEHIND

Sounds like SheweeJim has his work cut out for him this holiday season 😬🎄

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/676afc4efe36e938dee9637d/samoanclaus-hands-out-gifts-to-the-users-of-MovieChat?reply=676b1fa7fe36e938dee9646d

reply

[–] robocat893 (16248) 2 months ago

It's Christmas Eve and here you are calling out an anonymous user on a public message board. That's pathetic. Thinking about Kowalski 24/7 must be uncomfortable for you.

reply

[–] AngryViking (779) 2 months ago

There is no better day than Christmas Day to enjoy penis.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Pretty rich from someone who spends Christmas Eve speech-policing anonymous users on a public message board 🤣

Getting a very ‘Sisters’ vibe from you but I don’t think you’re on the list, let’s see how you proceed…

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

It's Christmas Eve and here you are calling out an anonymous user on a public message board. That's pathetic.

That's what tv does. He is obsessed with homosexuality and certain posters. And he will likely reply to this message with a personalised gay slur too, thus proving my point.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

That's what tv does.

‘tv’?

Are you having another retardo brainfart Flimflam?

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

No; sorry, just a case of careless typing. After a while all you of the most egregious lot seem the same to me, but my comments still apply. Thank you though for your kind words at this special time of year.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

As the most retarded of the Sisters I think ‘Special Sister’ can be your personalised ID going forwards.

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

"And he will likely reply to this message with a personalised gay slur too, thus proving my point."

QED

Happy Christmas.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Yeah, I think you should get a basic grasp of English before attempting Latin (and of course fucking that up too 🤦🏻‍♂️)

Perhaps consider it as a New Year’s resolution?

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

And I think you should resolve to get a basic grasp of what homophobia entails, and work on your attitude, See you on the next thread. Don't forget your closing gay slur btw.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

[deleted]

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

Knew you would.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

[deleted]

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

Knew you would again lol And...

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

[deleted]

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

... yet a third time lol. Well, I've really had my fun with you now today, proved my point again, so that's all from me. Repeat yourself once more by all means but I really have to get on. There are, after all, serious and less anal-centric posters to engage with. Thank you for playing.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

[deleted]

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

Oh dear.

I see you deleted your previous message, I guess you didn't think much of it either.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 2 months ago

Err, you deleted them, you fucking snake.

This is a new low for you.

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) 2 months ago

you deleted them

Something I cannot do. It must have been Admin. Perhaps your usual homophobic slurs were to blame since your less reprehensible remarks have survived.

you fucking snake.

.

Oh dear.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

You went squealing to the mods to get my posts deleted, ya little snake.

Welp, since your buttlord Skavau ran away The Sisters have been without a ‘Bogs’ figure.

I’m pleased to report that you’ve successfully been crowned Queen of The Sisters, you’re as much of a disgusting sack of shit as your predecessor.

I know you’ll do a great job. Let’s hope you last longer than Skavau (assuming, of course, that you’re not just a sock account, which would surprise nobody)…

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/66bff21be2b59409e700e862/If-Moviechat-was-Shawshank-prison?reply=677fe36a251a40187f7930db

reply

[–] filmflaneur (3014) a month ago

Troll.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) a month ago

What's the best way to survive when you find yourself in a snake pit? Be a snake. 😁

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

Update - Kowalski is now coming out as more than just a gay man, he’s now admitting to cross dressing:

I DO WEAR SKIRTS SOMETIMES

Under SheweeJim’s gay-mentor guidance Kowalski is fully becoming the aggressive bull queer in a skirt that he once tried so hard to suppress 👏

Source: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/678df1768c0c290f241e938b/So-MovieChat-is-now-advertising-skirts-for-men?reply=678df6f08c0c290f241e93a0

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) a month ago

YOU ARE A VERY CONFUSED FELLOW.....PERHAPS ASK PEOPLE SOME QUESTIONS SO YOU MAY BETTER UNDERSTAND THINGS.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

There are no questions to ask, the evidence is all there.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) a month ago

I read through that thread and I'm wondering that if your partner, mother and daughter don't wear skirts...where are you getting them from, how are they the right size and so on?

There's got to be more to the story here.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

That’s a great point.

We know Kowalski’s seriously overweight because of how much time he spends online, so where is he finding women’s clothes that fit an obese male?

Is his trannie-wardrobe all custom made? 🤔

Is he knitting this stuff himself while naked like Buffalo Bill, powered by the screams of his daughter emanating from a well in his basement? 🤔

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

YOU KNOW ME SO WELL.😁

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

I thought you were 6'6", lean with a huge cock. Why aren't you a porn star? 😁

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Kowalski’s self-descriptions are designed to lure in his victims, don’t believe anything he says. He is a drooling obese predatory homosexual in a skirt.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

I'm not buying it either. I once had an enemy on here, a troll who went so far as to create a caricature of me on YouTube as being obese. I'm not even fat.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

HEY BUDDY....AS A MEMBER OF THE MCMC PODCAST I HAVE BEEN ON ZOOM DOZENS UPON DOZENS OF TIMES WITH OTHERS HERE....I LOOK AS I LOOK....I DON'T HAVE TO DESCIBE...AND IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE BOUGHT...

https://imgur.com/gallery/kowalski-RlpMjdw

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

You should smile in your photos.

reply

[–] thesamoanjoke (15612) 24 days ago

Lol.....he is not obese...and we don't even have a basement :)

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Wait. We know Kowalski is fucking SheweeJim. He’s fucking you, too..?

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Just to let you know thesamoanjoke is his 15 year old daughter, so in this instance, it might be a good idea to post accordingly.

Not that I’m trying to take away your freedom of speech, just that there are times when one may need to be a little more polite.

Finally, just to be clear, I am in no way wishing to get into a fight, I’m just making you aware with whom you are conversing with (Diplomatic Andy).

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Thanks but… not buying it.

reply

[–] sslssg (35143) 24 days ago

Just because you don't want to buy it, it doesn't mean that it isn't true. She is 16 years old, and his daughter.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Oh bloody hell, don’t tell her that I thought she was still 15.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

So some people should get special treatment here? Are those just the ones you know, that are your friends, or perhaps you have some other standards by which you selectively apply the dogpile defense you'd like to share?

Or maybe minors 1) shouldn't be on this site and 2) if they are in the jungle that is Moviechat, they should not receive special treatment.

Here's a little something from the moviechat.org/terms Terms of Use for your consideration sslspecialtreatmentg:

"The Service is intended for users who are at least 18 years old. Persons under the age of 18 are not permitted to use or register for the Service."

Between this and the caps, you and your pals truly don't give a shit about the rules here, do you?

I'm sorry, that was unfair; you do care about them, but only so long as you're leveraging them in your favor, as I'm sure you are with the reports that you're presumably directing Melton's way that go along with your dogpile routine.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

If anyone knows about dogpiling here it's me, and sslssg has never been that type of poster.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

It's happening here and I've experienced it myself, so I must respectfully disagree.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

Yeah, it's always been a thing here, since the earliest days of the site. I've consistently spoken out against it and have just as consistently been ridiculed, attacked for that stance. I really don't think you've experienced it like I have. Although in my case, it really seems to have dissipated.

I'm just saying, sslssg is not that type of poster.

reply

[–] BenStrousers (964) 24 days ago

SS doesn't have to dogpile. She's the Charlie Manson of the group.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

When I stand up on the mountain and say, "Do it!", it gets done! And if it don't get done, then I'll move on it! And that's the last thing in the world you want me to do.

https://youtu.be/ltKhj1sbGNg?feature=shared&t=83

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

You're fucked up in the head! She's always been a class act here.

reply

[–] sslssg (35143) 24 days ago

I have never dogpiled on you. I was thrilled that you joined our zoom, and I thought you were a great contributor. I was really hoping that you would be a regular contributor. I don't know what happened with you and Kowalski, I and expressed my sadness at how nasty it got. You even went after Andy, and when I asked you what he did you to, you told me that you didn't know me well enough to continue the conversation. So I left it at that. Other than you commenting on a reply that I made recently we haven't had any interactions in months, so please tell me what I have done to you.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

I'm glad you clarified that, because I was thinking there was a chance I could have been referring to tcrum. But no, I was indeed referring to you.

The post you're talking about where I "went after" someone was a poster than had replied to me directly with a negative jab about people on this site that post on the politics board, and I responded with something roughly equivalent to the GD board to who's name I forget, but it wasn't Andy who I like quite a bit. That single reply was the end of it. Please verify this if you remember where those posts were, can do it easily or both.

My desire to not continue that exchange was not some admission as you might think, but because you seemed pleasant enough from our limited interactions and I didn't want to go forward with that one. It was also in the midst of what was starting to turn into a dogpile, where things can get nasty, and I didn't see a reason to engage in anything negative with you at the time.

I hope that clears up our previous encounter a bit.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

HEY BUDDY.....THIS LINE OF BULLSHIT YOU ARE DROPPING ABOUT SSLSSG IS COMPLETE NONSENSE AND YOU KNOW IT.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

This sounds like that time you claimed that the Earth is flat without any evidence.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

LMAO....BUSTED...I DO SO LOVE MY TORTILLA PLANET THEORY.

reply

[–] sslssg (35143) 24 days ago

My apologies. I thought it was Andy, but it was Mrmojo4700 who you called a faggot. My mistake.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

Yes that's the one, but no it wasn't.

That part I do remember. hint: it's a MCMC member.

reply

[–] sslssg (35143) 24 days ago

Well it was mrmojo that I was asking when I wondered what he did to you.

If you remember great, I don't know what game you are playing right now, but I'm not interested in playing. I know you don't like Kowalski, and that's fine.

In this thread I'm getting accused of dogpiling, and yet you and Benstrousers have both made comments about me for simply saying that samoanjoke was 16 years old. If that's against the rules, that's up to the mods. If Kowalski types in caps, that's up to the mods. If I ever bring up the rules of the site, it's just to remind someone of them, but enforcement is up to the mods. I've never gotten anyone removed from here. This whole thread should be against the rules as it's a bullying post, but again, that's up to the mods.

You still haven't answered what I did or said to you.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 23 days ago

This whole thread should be against the rules as it's a bullying post

No it isn’t. You’re trying to frame it as such so that you can get it nuked. I see you.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 23 days ago

Wow! 😄 Two of the most benign posters here getting pushed to that point?

reply

[–] StoneKeeper (28301) 24 days ago

There’s a difference between knowing and not knowing. It’s all a question of the information we have at hand. If I knew for a fact that Melton was 12 (which would explain a lot) then I would stop insulting him and just leave the kid be until his parents finally find him a hobby. But since I have no clue if he’s a kid or not, I can properly tell him to go and fuck off. I think that’s just common sense.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

You edited that to refer to Melton instead of Kowalski's daughter. You also had mentioned the age of the daughter being 16 but now are making an allusion towards Melton being 12 instead.

I like you Stoney, but that was sneaky. Are you now trying to hide something?

reply

[–] StoneKeeper (28301) 24 days ago

I don’t see the difference it makes but I can put it that way if you prefer; since I know this is Ali’s account and she’s 16, I’m approaching her accordingly with the information at hand. Which you know as much as I do that is a fact. (Rule compliant or not. That, I personally don’t care.) And no, I got nothing to hide. You know me!

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

[–] StoneKeeper (27864)
a few seconds ago
I don’t see the difference it makes but I can put it that way if you prefer; since I know this is Ali’s account and she’s 16, I’m approaching her accordingly with the information at hand. Which you know as much as I do that is a fact. Rule compliant or not. That, I personally don’t care.

I see. I admire your honesty Stoney.

reply

[–] StoneKeeper (28301) 24 days ago

Thanks man

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 23 days ago

If I knew for a fact that Melton was 12 (which would explain a lot)

Yeah, it would explain why Kowalski is always flirting with me.

You Sisters are gross 🤢

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

[–] sslssg (34714) 10 hours ago
She is 16 years old, and his daughter.

Oh ok, so Kowalski's daughter is actually 16 instead of 15. Thanks for clarifying that.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Trust me, she’s a teenage girl. Be nice. Please.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

No. We all know what a disgusting degenerate fuckhead Kowalski is, but not even he would allow his daughter, a minor, to roam freely on a message board in which he is frequently trying to pick up guys by graphically describing brutal homosexual activities with them.

And that’s before we even begin to describe all the deranged, narcissistic shit he squeals in all-caps day-in day-out, when he should be providing for his family.

No parent could be that fucked up.

Nobody calling themself a ‘father’ could even contemplate that.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Well, if you want to get a reputation for bullying teenage girls, then that’s on you.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Eat shit, liar.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

No worries. I’ve tried to be polite. I shall leave you to carry on.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Yeah fuck off

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

I shall bid you good day.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

Yeah fuck off

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Is that a temporary fuck off or a permanent one?

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

What happened to ‘I shall leave you to carry on’ and ‘good day’?

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

No, I was just wondering.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

OK.

What happened to ‘I shall leave you to carry on’ and ‘good day’?

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

Well, you made a further comment, which piqued my interest. So I thought I’d just ask on what basis it was intended.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

It was exactly the same comment to which you replied ‘I shall bid you good day.’

You’re not very consistent.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

So, was it permanent or temporary? I’m happy to oblige either way.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 24 days ago

I’ll leave it to your imagination, but I do want you to keep bumping this thread.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

It was quite a straight forward question.

Also, since your thread is already at the top of page 1, I’m not actually bumping anything.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 23 days ago

Perfect. Thanks for the bump.

Now GTFO of my thread, dickhead.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

[–] AndyKing1967 (39380) 11 hours ago
Just to let you know thesamoanjoke is his 15 year old daughter

15, huh? That's pretty young for some of the content here.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (39795) 24 days ago

I’m not her parent or guardian so I have no say in the matter.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

SHE WILL BE 17 NEXT WEEK....AND SHE IS THE DAUGHTER OF KOWALSKI......MEANING SHE IS MORE MATURE THAN YOU AT THIS POINT,BUDDY.😘

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

[–] Kowalski (77439) 2 minutes ago
SHE WILL BE 17 NEXT WEEK....AND SHE IS THE DAUGHTER OF KOWALSKI......MEANING SHE IS MORE MATURE THAN YOU AT THIS POINT,BUDDY.😘

Kowalski, between your real name you've posted here, your location, pictures of you, your daughter's real name and age, and now essentially revealing the actual date of birth of your daughter with 1/7 accuracy, you're not only doxing yourself but your daughter who is a minor.

We've had our differences, but what the actual fuck Clay? This isn't funny or acceptable. Doxing is another site Terms and Standards violation, and you're doing it to your own daughter. Things are getting out of hand.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

LMAO....WE ARE NOT WORRIED ABOUT ANY OF THAT.....LIKE NOT AT ALL....SERIOUSLY BRO....WE ARE A COUPLE OF THE MOST STRAIGHT FORWARD PEOPLE YOU ARE GONNA FIND ON HERE....WHY INVEST SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT INTO ATTEMPTING TO FUCK WITH US?....WE LIKED YOU....QUITE A BIT....AND EVEN AFTER OUR DUSTUP...I THOUGHT YOU HAD MESSAGED ME AN OLIVE BRANCH....SEEMED LIKE WE WERE GONNA BE FRIENDLY GOING FORWARD.🤔

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

[–] Kowalski (77440) 4 minutes ago
LMAO....WE ARE NOT WORRIED ABOUT ANY OF THAT.....LIKE NOT AT ALL....SERIOUSLY BRO....WE ARE A COUPLE OF THE MOST STRAIGHT FORWARD PEOPLE YOU ARE GONNA FIND ON HERE....WHY INVEST SO MUCH TIME AND EFFORT INTO ATTEMPTING TO FUCK WITH US?....WE LIKED YOU....QUITE A BIT....AND EVEN AFTER OUR DUSTUP...I THOUGHT YOU HAD MESSAGED ME AN OLIVE BRANCH....SEEMED LIKE WE WERE GONNA BE FRIENDLY GOING FORWARD.🤔

Kowalski, I am sincerely being serious here. I'm not trying to be funny or escalate anything between us.

What you're doing isn't OK. You're placing her personal identifiable information on the internet for anyone to access, on a site like this that is essentially adult themed, and that has been and will be crystallized and archived. I'm not going to go into insults about your intelligence or anything, but what you're doing is an absolutely terrible choice and it has nothing to do with being straight forward people or how much you do or don't like me.

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 24 days ago

APPRECIATE THE ODD CONCERN...BUT SERIOUSLY....WHAT YOU ARE SPEAKING ON IS SILLY AND NOT A CONCERN....NOT A CONCERN AT ALL.

reply

[–] BenStrousers (964) 23 days ago

He also had many sexually explicit conversations with her. What father does that with his own teenaged daughter in private, let alone in public!

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 23 days ago

😂

reply

[–] BenStrousers (964) 23 days ago

Hilarious! If half the things you've said were true, that'll be cause for concern.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 20 days ago

I’ve seen Kowalski describe graphic gay sex fantasies in front of his kid daughter, which is weird and gross, but you’re saying he actually has sexually explicit conversations with her?

Do you have any examples?

reply

[–] BenStrousers (964) 20 days ago

That would require a deep dive into his post history, I don't have the stomach for that today. He has cooled that down since the last time I mentioned it, seems like he needed to be told how inappropriate it was.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 23 days ago

WE ARE A COUPLE

What..?

reply

[–] Kowalski (78914) 23 days ago

AWW....THAT WAS A BIG SWING AND A MISS.😂

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 23 days ago

Let’s get this straight. Are you ‘a couple’?

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 16 days ago

*crickets*

OMG.

The rumours are true: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/673c0f007ccd5b684cf4cb3b/I-AM-A-GAY-MAN?reply=6799bef0d77c596b3c207be7

Kowalski, keep a safe distance from your child. Whatever you may think, you are NOT ‘a couple’ OK? she’s your kid FFS.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

🚨 MAJOR UPDATE 🚨

KOWALSKI’S ‘WIFE’ LEAVES HIM AFTER DISCOVERING HIS SECRET GAY LIFE

That’s right, the mother of Kowalski’s child finally confirmed what deep down she always suspected - that her partner, who spends 24/7 online rather than providing for his family, is in fact an insatiable predatory homosexual.

It is unclear whether his beard went snooping and discovered his constant gay flirting on Moviechat, or if she caught him in the act with one of his many victims. Something finally broke the camel’s back and she’s peacing-out of the relationship with as much money as she can extract.

Kowalski describes the break-up as follows:

MY DAUGHTER'S MOTHER AND I''S RELATIONSHIP HAD BEEN ROUGH FOR A WHILE...WE DECIDED TO SPLIT UP AND REGROUP AS PARTNERS AND FRIENDS....NO ROMANTIC OR RELATIONSHIP STUFF.....SO FAR SO GOOD...WE ARE SPENDING TIME TOGETHER WITH MY DAUGHTER AND GETTING ALONG....BUT AS FAR AS ROMANTIC STUFF...I AM NOW SINGLE.

This has coincided with Kowalski ramping up his grooming of male Moviechat users, hoping to isolate them IRL and make his move. He told unsuspecting user aliensalmon ‘YOU AND I SHOULD GO LADY HUNTING.😉’

Male Moviechat users are warned that they cannot be protected from Kowalski coming on to them with lines such as ‘wow, you look great, you’re definitely going to get lucky tonight’ as he starts caressing your leg. Or worse, plying them with alcohol and deploying date rape drugs.

This thread began with Kowalski coming out, he then moved to cross-dressing and publicly boasting about his brutal homosexual exploits, now he has been kicked out of his sham marriage and is going after straight guys with every ‘tool’ at his disposal. The scandal is only expected to worsen. Stay tuned. Stay safe.

Sources:
https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/679021b5367ceb6a8f4cad4d/Anyone-else-single-but-still-like-Valentines-Day?reply=679023bf367ceb6a8f4cad5f

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/679021b5367ceb6a8f4cad4d/Anyone-else-single-but-still-like-Valentines-Day?reply=679025dd367ceb6a8f4cad72

reply

[–] robocat893 (16248) a month ago

You're obsession with Kowalski is unhealthy. You should seek help because it would be beneficial for you.

You really are a sad little clown. 🤡

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16308) 24 days ago

Good summary

I wonder if the other die hard right wing Trumpers think he is representing their demographic in the light they'd like to be seen.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

Shit summary.

And shit attempt by you at a ‘what will x think of you..?’

Who gives a fuck? Kowalski is a sexual predator and people need to know, and it’s weird that you're running defence for the creep.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16308) 22 days ago

everyone who has posted in this thread except you is "running defence for the creep."

Can you find a single post from someone supporting your side of this thread / debate/ discussion / character assassination / whetever you wanna call it .

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

everyone who has posted in this thread except you is "running defence for the creep."

No, just a few fellow creeps, like yourself.

Can you find a single post from someone supporting your side of this thread / debate/ discussion / character assassination / whetever you wanna call it .

Yes, but then I don’t timidly look around for approval like you, nor do I care about ‘sides’
like a little collectivist bitch. I’m only interested in what’s true, and alerting people to the predatory homosexual that is Kowalski, and his creepy supporters like yourself.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16308) 22 days ago

"Yes, but then I don’t timidly look around "

translation - "I didnt name anyone because there is nobody backing up my delusional vindictive witch hunt "

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 12 days ago

Translation - ‘Oh shit, I am a collectivist bitch who constantly looks around for approval. Melton has described me perfectly. Quick, err, try to change the subject…’

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 22 days ago

Actually, you've been far too venomous here. And stop pretending as if you're on some sort of a righteous crusade. I've seen nothing especially masculine about you to justify all of this self righteous, hateful ranting of yours.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

Wow, look at you go frantically trying to protect and enable Kowalski the predatory homosexual who graphically describes gay sex in front of his young daughter.

This is really important for you. Why? 🤔

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 22 days ago

"Frantically"? 🙄 You're the one on a non-stop, rabid, homophobic rant. Project much do you? You've got a real mental problem.

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

Why are you so desperate to protect and enable Kowalski the predatory homosexual who graphically describes gay sex in front of his young daughter?

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 22 days ago

The frantic desperation seems to be with you. Again, project much do you?

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

Let’s try again. Why are you so desperate to protect and enable Kowalski the predatory homosexual who graphically describes gay sex in front of his young daughter?

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 22 days ago

[–] db20db (17579) 18 hours ago
You're now also revealing how incredibly stupid you are. Keep pushing, creep. I have a different style than sslssg and I guarantee you're not going to like it.

Be careful Melton; you're dealing with Scrappy-Doo now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOK9-sKz79s&t=14s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG8dgN6x2EA

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 21 hours ago

Feisty little bear-cub isn’t he? 🤣

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 20 hours ago

The Scrappy-Doo resemblance is striking.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 12 days ago

Hello.

How can I be of assistance?

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

👆 See how The Sisters impulsively circle the wagons when one of their own gets exposed. Makes you wonder how many others of them have been found out by their beards… 🤔

reply

[–] BenStrousers (964) a month ago

Stay safe. 😄

reply

[–] Melton (5549) a month ago

Gay men, much like single ageing women, often have a selection of pet cats. Kowalski’s latest admission leaves little doubt as to why his ‘wife’ started to suspect she was living with a homosexual:

I HAVE 13 MALE CATS.

Let that number sink in. If there was a video game called ‘Cat Lady Carnage’ Kowalski would surely be the final boss.

Source: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/6791a50db44c1b2623b32b5a/My-cat-Frances-is-looking-for-a-boyfriend?reply=6791ae1a5206f758b82484b4

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 24 days ago

How is the heated content in this thread any different than what goes on in the Politics board?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16308) 22 days ago

Yes things dont usually get this heated in gd , but thats not how the two areas are divided.
the rule isnt "all the heated shouty threads go in politics" its based on the subject

Melton coming up in here and with his sustained campaign of hate and abuse has blurred the line somewhat and brought politic page style heat to the gd page.

I guess the entertainment value of him spewing his bile whilst being completely alone has motivated the interactions and helped him avoid a ban

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 20 days ago

Notice how you use phoney words like ‘hate’ and ‘abuse’ in the hope of getting content you don’t like censored and banned, an age-old evil Leftist tactic.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16308) 19 days ago

sorry i was struggling to come up with adjectives to describe the vile objectionable ugly history of your posts here .
I guess I dont really need to , everyone can see it , so let me rephrase .

"Melton is being Melton"

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 19 days ago

There could be no greater compliment than to earn the disapproval of a disgusting, evil, censorious sack of shit like yourself. Thank you.

reply

[–] db20db (17730) 19 days ago

Again, project much do you? 😏

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 18 days ago

What are you talking about?

reply

[–] Melton (5549) 22 days ago

Kowalski trying to pick up guys with graphic descriptions of gay sex in front of his daughter, which you support, isn’t a political issue 🤷🏻‍♂️

reply

[–] jk90us (8213) 24 days ago

Why did you link back to this post?

Do you get lost easily and can’t find your way back?

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (3245) 24 days ago

You have 7891 posts and never realized that this happens when the post that was originally linked to is deleted?

That's umm, interesting.