(Standard condensed version, like in the famous Andy Warhol painting)
I haven't had it in ages, but I was feeling nauseous today due to some prescription I'm on for the next week, and it seemed like just the thing, and it was.
It brought back memories of sick days from school, and watching The Price is Right hosted by pre-gray-hair Bob Barker.
The broth is excellent (but only if you add half the amount of water that the can says to add, which I've been doing since I was a kid). The noodles are soggy but that's inevitable due to the canning process.
The only problem I have with it is the lack of chicken. If you were to weigh all the tiny bits of chicken that are in one can, it would probably only be a few grams total, and you could probably fit them all at once in a soup spoon. There's an easy fix for that though. I added half a pound of cut-up raw chicken thigh meat (I like to use thigh meat because it stays tender and moist even when you boil it) to two cans of it, which made it into an actual filling meal in addition to a cure for nausea.
I wonder if Joseph Campbell and C.S. Lewis had slight spats like the one below?
We should all be working together to discover and/or create from the best store-bought chicken [noodle] soup, like how Campbell and Lewis did regarding storytelling.
I recently started making my own wonton soup and egg drop soup. Not from scratch, but still pretty darn good.
Store bought chicken broth (I add some water to increase yield)
Store bought frozen wontons, or eggs (lightly beaten)
Garlic
Ginger
Soy sauce
Sesame oil
Green onions
Lots of recipes out there, bought it really just comes down to bringing the above ingredients to a simmer.
Chicken noodle soup has been my #1 go to soup for years now, primarily for the medicinal properties in the broth, but it's also generally hearty and nutritious as well. I gave up on Campbell's long ago though, because I feel like I get more bang for my buck with the Kroger's brand, i.e., a larger can for a better price, and much larger, nicer chunks of chicken. I also enhance it with added, frozen mixed vegetables, fresh onion, garlic and ginger root.
And since it has the same amount of fat, carbohydrates, and protein (which inherently means the same amount of calories too) as Campbell's, it has to have about the same amount of chicken (and the same amount of noodles) as Campbell's.
As for the amount of chicken, there's never going to be as much in there as I want, which is why I always add my own, at least a half-pound of chicken for two cans. I sometimes add egg noodles too. Kluski noodles are the best for chicken noodle soup IMO, but my ineptly managed local grocery store doesn't carry them anymore.
I feel that you're trying to gaslight me, just like you did with your hornets thread, when you presented that side by side comparison and could have easily done that from the beginning, instead of soliciting comments from others on here to identify it. It's clearly a baiting tactic so you can eventually try to display your condescending superior knowledge.
Overcompensating guys like you are a dime a dozen in internet forums.
"I feel that you're trying to gaslight me, just like you did with your hornets thread, when you presented that side by side comparison and could have easily done that from the beginning, instead of soliciting comments from others on here to identify it."
You've got a wild imagination. I couldn't have done that from the beginning at all, let alone "easily," because I couldn't find any pictures of hornets that had the same markings as the ones I killed. Try the search yourself; type "hornet" into Google image search. None of those match. It wasn't until I thought of typing "hornet vs. yellow jacket" into the image search that I found that picture with the matching stripe pattern, which was after I asked if anyone could identify the ones I killed.
"It's clearly a baiting tactic so you can eventually try to display your condescending superior knowledge."
Your laughable attempt at a crystal ball reading is dismissed, Miss Cleo.
Also, "gaslighting" doesn't mean what you think it means. Even if this insane, out-of-left-field assertion of yours were correct (it isn't, obviously), it wouldn't be an instance of gaslighting. And it's especially funny that you think I somehow "baited" you into typing bad information about Kroger chicken noodle soup. Why don't you explain how I did that by only talking about Campbell's chicken noodle soup? Before you mentioned it, I'd never even heard of it. Kroger doesn't exist here in Maine.
"Overcompensating guys like you are a dime a dozen in internet forums."
Your psychobabble is dismissed, Sigmund. Nutjobs (you, for instance) are a dime a dozen in general, not just on internet forums.
How do you even know what I think gaslighting means? That's extremely presumptuous and arrogant, which is what condescending people are.
You erroneously assumed that I was referring to the 10.5 oz. can of Kroger's soup, when that size can doesn't even exist on my grocer's shelves in the soup aisle. The cans I buy are 18.6 ounces, unmistakably larger and more affordable than Campbell's. Then you accused me of "typing bad information" when in fact, I was right, and that was another quick and wrong assumption on your part. And your admission that you have never even heard of Kroger's before, supports my interpretation of your response as gaslighting, since you have never made that instantaneous visual comparison in the store. And why did you feel it necessary to repeat your strategy of buying two cans of Campbell's and adding a half pound of chicken? We all got that the first time around. Not only was that redundant but also stupid.
I've taken a cursory look at your posting history. You definitely come across with an air of superiority, full of yourself, the type that likes to listen to himself talk. I've seen verbose posts of yours that never garnered a single response.
"How do you even know what I think gaslighting means?"
I don't know exactly what you think it means (nor did I claim that I did); I know that it doesn't mean whatever it is that you think it means because you used it incorrectly. The actual meaning (as opposed to your made-up meaning) doesn't even come close to denoting the thing that you imagined that I did.
"That's extremely presumptuous and arrogant, which is what condescending people are."
Negated by your false premise (see above).
"You erroneously assumed that I was referring to the 10.5 oz. can of Kroger's soup"
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you were making an apples-to-apples comparison, i.e., condensed vs. condensed.
"The cans I buy are 18.6 ounces, unmistakably larger and more affordable than Campbell's."
Are you daft? That extra amount is water, because the 18.6 ounce can is "ready to serve," i.e., not condensed:
When you add the can of water to a can of condensed chicken noodle soup so that it's ready to serve, it becomes about 21.5 ounces. Campbell's also makes 18.6-ounce "ready to serve" versions of Chicken Noodle Soup, and they've done so for over 50 years:
And it has more/larger pieces of chicken, as well as vegetables. That's the product that the Kroger brand that you buy is copying / comparable to, not the product I'm talking about (I specifically said I was talking about the standard condensed version like in the famous Andy Warhol painting).
"Then you accused me of "typing bad information" when in fact, I was right, and that was another quick and wrong assumption on your part."
No, you weren't right. You simply don't know how to make a valid comparison (see above).
"And your admission that you have never even heard of Kroger's before, supports my interpretation of your response as gaslighting, since you have never made that instantaneous visual comparison in the store."
No, it doesn't. It has nothing to do with gaslighting whatsoever. Also, do you think Kroger is unique in having its own "store brand"? All of the big grocery store chains do that, and I've yet to encounter a store brand that's better than the name brand that it's copying. In this case, the stuff you buy is copying Campbell's Chunky line of soup, which is very different than the Campbell's soup I've been talking about.
"And why did you feel it necessary to repeat your strategy of buying two cans of Campbell's and adding a half pound of chicken?"
If you could read properly you would already know. I didn't simply repeat it, I said, "As for the amount of chicken, there's never going to be as much in there as I want, which is why [...]"
You're never going to find anywhere near 1/4-pound of chicken in a 10.75-ounce can of condensed or 18.6-ounce can of "ready to serve" soup, so the extra amount of chicken in the ready to serve version means nothing to me, because I'm going to be adding a lot more chicken anyway. I prefer the condensed version because I like the broth better (which is the important part because anything else I can add myself) and I can control its concetration due to it being condensed. The only way to make the broth more concentrated with a "ready to serve" soup is to boil it down, which takes quite a while.
"We all got that the first time around. Not only was that redundant but also stupid."
Your non sequitur is dismissed, Slow Doug.
"I've taken a cursory look at your posting history. You definitely come across with an air of superiority, full of yourself, the type that likes to listen to himself talk."
What do you think the opinion of someone who doesn't know what "gaslighting" means, doesn't know how to make a valid apple-to-apples comparison, and imagines that someone "baited" him into misidentifying a hornet and making an invalid soup comparison, is worth?
"I've seen verbose posts of yours that never garnered a single response."
A perfect example of not only one of your verbose posts, but also of convoluted doublespeak.
Of course it was gaslighting. You openly admitted that you immediately concluded that I was imparting "bad information", seized upon that to assert your superior information, because you're so egocentric, full of yourself. In reality, you were the one relying on "bad information." You're probably one of those idiots that blindly accepts Photoshop, deep fakes and AI. Your response made me feel that I couldn't trust my own eyes and common sense, after years of purchasing that product, which is the literal definition of gaslighting.
And now, because of me, you've suddenly become aware that Kroger is one of the country's largest grocery chains, so you were also responding out of pure ignorance. You're welcome.
"A perfect example of not only one of your verbose posts, but also of convoluted doublespeak."
Your non sequitur is dismissed, simpleton.
"Of course it was gaslighting."
Again, that word doesn't mean what you think it means.
"You openly admitted that you immediately concluded that I was imparting "bad information""
That's because you were, and to an even greater degree than I originally thought when I assumed you were smart enough to make an apples-to-apples comparison. In that case, your error would have only been slight, because the condensed versions are almost the same size. However, in the case of the 18.6-ounce "ready to serve" can, it's substantially less than the "ready to serve" amount of the 10.75-ounce Campbell's can (which is about 21.5 ounces). 18.6 ounces is less than 21.5 ounces, obviously.
"seized upon that to assert your superior information"
I usually correct bad information when replying to a post, because good information is better than bad information, obviously. And people who are not a child, or childish, are glad to have their misconceptions corrected, because, again, good information is better than bad information. But you are childish, including the wild imagination aspect of childishness, and the inherent stupidity that goes along with children having brains that aren't yet fully developed.
"because you're so egocentric, full of yourself."
Your non sequitur is dismissed.
"In reality, you were the one relying on "bad information.""
False. Your information was even worse than I originally thought when I was giving you the benefit of the doubt (see above). You not understanding the difference between condensed and "ready to serve" soup is hilarious.
"You're probably one of those idiots that blindly accepts Photoshop, deep fakes and AI."
Your non sequitur is dismissed. Also, Comical Irony Alert, coming from the guy who's a well-established idiot at this point.
"Your response made me feel that I couldn't trust my own eyes and common sense, after years of purchasing that product"
You can't, because you don't understand the difference between condensed soup and "ready to serve" soup. The "ready to serve" amount of a 10.75-ounce can of condensed Campbell's soup is approximately double the weight of the can's contents (about 21.5 ounces), because the instructions say to add 1 can of water before serving. Just for the sake of accuracy, I just weighed a soup can's worth of water and it weighs 11.5 ounces, which means the "ready to serve" amount is 22.25 ounces.
I suppose you also think you get more with your 18.6-ounce can of Kroger chicken noodle soup than with an envelope of Lipton chicken noodle soup too, because it only weighs 2.25 ounces. Nevermind that it's not ready to serve that way, and after adding the amount of water that you're supposed to, the weight is 34.25 ounces. That's far too complex a concept for you, obviously, even though I had no trouble understanding it even when I was a kid.
"which is the literal definition of gaslighting."
No, Special Ed., in order for me to be "gaslighting" I would have to be giving you false information in an effort to make you question your correct information gathered from your own senses/experiences/memories. What I've done is exactly the opposite. The information about the hornet was correct according to the University of Florida's website, and your information was wrong. The information about the soup is correct according to basic math (22.25 ounces is greater than 18.6 ounces), as well as according to the logic pertaining to valid comparisons (apples-to-apples vs. apples-to-oranges).
"And now, because of me, you've suddenly become aware that Kroger is one the world's largest grocery chains"
I didn't say I hadn't heard of Kroger, numbnuts (Kroger is the place that infamous Soapbox poster Meade Skelton was allegedly banned from many years ago); I said I hadn't heard of their brand of chicken noodle soup.
"so you were also responding out of pure ignorance. You're welcome."
No, bird brain. Prior knowledge of Kroger chicken noodle soup, or even of Kroger itself, isn't at all pertinent to anything I said, since every relevant detail about their chicken noodle soup can easily be found online.
Obfuscation. π You made an issue of 10.5 ounces vs 18.6 ounces. Where did that 22.25 ounces suddenly even come from? Oh I get it...you're one of those assholes who buys into late nite infomercials of how size matters and you throw your money away on that bullshit. Brainwashed idiot by the internet.
"You made an issue of 10.5 ounces, vs 18.6 ounces. Where did that 22.25 ounces suddenly even come from?"
If you knew how to read properly you would already know, since I've already explained the not-exactly-rocket-science concept.
Again, the 10.75-ounce can of Campbell's soup that this thread is about, is condensed. It has always been condensed for as long as it has been on the market. Do you know what condensed means? In order to make it "ready to serve" you are supposed to add 1 soup can's worth of water to it, and that weighs 11.5 ounces. That means the ready to serve weight is 22.25 ounces (11.5 + 10.75 = 22.25). You can read the directions from a vintage label right here - https://www.campbellsoup.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/1948CNS-label-Canada.jpg
The 18.6-ounce can of Kroger chicken noodle soup (and the 18.6-ounce can of Campbell's Chunky chicken noodle soup that it's copying) is not condensed, which means you do not add any water to it, which is why it says "ready to serve" on the can instead of "condensed." Notice that the directions on the can specifically say to not add water, in all capital letters no less - https://i.imgur.com/x8Qu75x.png
So its ready to serve weight is 18.6 ounces, which is obviously less than 22.25 ounces.
Concentrated frozen orange juice is the same idea (concentrated and condensed means the same thing in this context), i.e., they removed water before packaging it and you add the water back in before serving it. Condensed milk is another example.
"Oh I get it...you're one of those assholes who buys into late nite infomercials of how size matters and you throw your money away on that bullshit. Brainwashed idiot by the internet."
LOL! This is the most comical bit of irony that I've seen all week, coming from an utter buffoon who doesn't understand the incredibly simple concept of condensed vs. not condensed. Back in school in the 1980s the consumer ed. teacher did a lesson on this very topic, and condensed Campbell's soup vs. non-condensed Campbell's "Chunky" soup was the main example he used. Most of the kids already understood the difference, but you would have been one of the kids left scratching your head with a blank and confused stare on your face.
In short:
- Kroger 18.6-ounce can of "ready to serve" chicken noodle soup yields 18.6 ounces of soup.
- Campbell's 10.75-ounce can of condensed chicken noodle soup yields 22.25 ounces of soup.
Aha! I now recognize you as the "non sequitur", "tacit concession" guy, your go to, dismissive responses whenever someone corners you with truth and logic. π
Even your moniker here hints at an overly inflated ego. π€¨
"whenever someone corners you with truth and logic."
You mean like the "truth and logic" of your assertion that 18.6 ounces is more than 22.25 ounces? LOL at that, and LOL at you too, you know, while I'm at it.
In reality (as opposed to your delusional fantasy world), that's never happened here, which is why you can't produce any examples to back up your mere, and asinine, assertions. If you look hard enough on the internet you can find an example of me being wrong about the main point of contention in an argument regarding differential gear ratio vs. driveshaft RPM at a given speed, many years ago, on a different website, and you'll also see that I conceded that I was wrong, like anyone who isn't childish would do.
In any case, since you still haven't addressed, let alone refuted, anything I said, your tacit concession remains noted.
You've refuted exactly nothing, moron. And LOL at you thinking it's even possible to refute the fact that 22.25 ounces is more than 18.6 ounces. Only an idiot thinks he's getting more soup with one of those 18.6-ounce "ready to serve" cans of soup than with one of the 10.5 or 10.75 ounce cans of condensed soup.
It's like someone thinking they get more orange juice if they buy a quart (32 ounces) of ready to serve orange juice instead of a 16-ounce can of frozen orange juice concentrate, even though the latter yields half a gallon (64 ounces) of orange juice.
"which is how we ended up in this days long argument"
You haven't been arguing, dipshit. It isn't even possible to argue without first addressing what's been said in the argument. You're merely a shit-poster, and dumb as a bag of hammers.
"dumb shit"
More comical irony, coming from the registered and tagged idiot who's easily among the dumbest posters here. You could very well be the dumbest, since I doubt there's anyone else here who doesn't understand, or who couldn't easily be made to understand, that you get more soup with a 10.5 or 10.75-ounce can of condensed soup than with an 18.6-ounce can of "ready to serve" (not condensed) soup.
And of course, since you still haven't addressed, let alone refuted, anything I said, your tacit concession remains noted.
Still LOL at you thinking that 18.6 ounces is more than 22.25 ounces, and that someone correcting your errors is "gaslighting" you.
Yadda, yadda. Keep harping about condensed vs not condensed, because you're consistently revealing yourself to be the obsessed nutcase that you are.π
That's why I use thigh meat. It stays tender and moist even when bite-size pieces of it are boiled for 10 minutes or so. Drumstick meat is good too. White meat is good IMO when cooked right, such as chicken breasts or tenders at Popeyes or Kentucky Fried Chicken, but it's not good for boiling, unless you intend to boil it long enough for it to get "stewed" (a couple of hours). Then it doesn't really matter what type of meat it is.
Good to note that it's best not to boil chicken breast.
I think that's been my issue using breast for stew. Most times it's dry/flavorless or sometimes mush. [I thought maybe just browning the chicken would be good enough... has more flavor, but still ends up dry/tasteless most times].
Me too... Years ago I found a recipe for chicken fajitas that called for boneless chicken breasts. When I cooked the chicken it came out dry and a tough. The next time I made this recipe I used boneless chicken thighs and it made a huge difference and the chicken was juicy and flavorful. Now I use chicken thighs in most of my recipes that call for chicken.