MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > "Kicking your kid out as soon as they tu...

"Kicking your kid out as soon as they turn 18 is abusive."


Your thoughts? Copied and pasted from Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/109twae/kicking_your_kid_out_as_soon_as_they_turn_18_is/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

I keep seeing videos and posts of parents who do this and justify it. And no, I’m not talking about the kids who are psychopaths or sadists or whatever.

I have never once heard any good parent explain with good reasoning why they kick their kid out of the house as soon as they’re legally able too. They always default to the same excuse of “well I don’t have to take care of them anymore”. Sorry, but being a parent doesn’t stop at 18. When you have a child and choose to raise it, then you’re going to be their parents for life. That includes making sure that they are given a good start into adulthood by allowing them to gain life experience first. Which means letting them live with you until they’re comfortable being on their own.

I have never, ever understood how any self proclaimed “good mother” or “good father” can be excited to throw their child on the streets without a second thought as soon as they can. You’re setting your kid up for failure. It’s abusive, and you shouldn’t have had children if you didn’t want to put in the work of having one.

reply

Coming from an Indian background, I think it's a horrible idea. I still remember being a sophomore in hs, and my mother would drop off my older sister's friend home (from school). One day she told us that in x months she had to move out of her home because she was turning 18.

She was a senior (full-time student), and would need to find a job that would provide for rent and expenses seems a bit harsh to me. After she turned 18, I don't think my sister ever saw her again at school.

reply

It seems many Indian families even in USA/Canada, alot of their children live past their adulthood into their 20s and 30s. Even with well-educated and high paying jobs, they still chose to live with their parents. It is actually considered "normal" in that culture and many seem happy with it. They seem to be against individuality and more about acting as one unit.

Who am I to judge though what is "right" and "wrong" with a culture? They probably think us Westerners are "weird" for moving away from parents at 18.

reply

You are pretty much correct regarding what you stated about Indian families in the US/CAD, reasons may vary but all in all, it is acceptable for 18-year-olds to live in their parents' house.

Like I said before, coming from an Indian background (and also, being born and raised in the US) I still think this is a horrible idea. I've witnessed some good results and some really bad results. It's only "culturally" acceptable because of the law coding "legal age". If it was coded as 17 years of age, people would be all for it; if it was set at 15 years of age, people be all for it; It's a matter of law and legal liability vs household expenses.

Who am I to judge though what is "right" and "wrong" with a culture? They probably think us Westerners are "weird" for moving away from parents at 18.


This confuses me a bit. The topic was from the viewpoint of parents "kicking" their kids out at 18; however, you flipped it to say 'kids wanting to move out of their parent's home at 18'. They don't mean the same thing.

reply

Given the exorbitant cost of living, which no regular job you could get as a teen could pay for, yeah I'd call it abuse. More than that, it tells me that any parent who does this likely only had kids for the welfare benefits - because 18 is when they no longer receive those benefits.

reply

There was a time when parents had lots of children so they had someone to work the farm.

reply