I agree, so I won't.
While it's not fun getting scratched by a cat, it's not fair to them to remove a natural weapon they need to defend themselves, even if they never really need to do so. Even worse, declawing leads to cats biting more.
Absolutely. Itβs actually an amputation of the end of their claws. It should be banned. Clip their claws often to dull them.
shareIt is illegal in Australia and New Zealand. And rightly so, itβs horribly cruel.
shareIt's illegal in Europe also. πͺπΊβ
Who wants a declawed cat should buy a doll.
illegal under laws against cruelty to animals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onychectomy#Europe
Oh, Maryland just banned declawing also...after NY in 2019.
That gives me hope for the USA.
Meow thanks to NY and Maryland !! πββ¬β πββ¬β πββ¬β
True.
Its akin to having your finger amputated at the nail joint/knuckle. It messes up their posture as cats walk on their toes which causes their weight distribution to shift causing unnecessary joint pain πΎ.
It is VERY cruel, and should NEVER be done.
π€¨
I feel the same way. We can't at all.
shareI canβt imagine why anyone who claims to love cats would even consider such a barbaric thing. If your furniture or carpet is so important to you, donβt get a cat.
shareπ₯±π₯±π₯±π₯±
shareWhat a surprise that YOU would agree with it ππππ
sharehttps://i.postimg.cc/pLssrqJs/ezgif-5-e21369dec4.gif
shareYeah bitch, not clicking on one of your retarded gifs, thanks anyway π
shareBut nobody wants claws in their cat soup.
shareLol
Asshole. That made me laugh πΉ
Mission To Disgust The People Of Moviechat: accomplished.
shareIβm not disgusted, I thought it was funny.
Still, that said, I am disgusted by your dress sense, but weβve spoken about that before and this is neither the time nor the place to open those old wounds.
This is overkill. You began to disgust me years ago.
shareYou're such a charmer. You must be brushing off the ladies left and right.
shareThose are flies heβs brushing off, not ladies.
shareI was saving leeches for him.
shareThis venomous response is revealing in how badly I got under your skin with a straightforward criticism that you actually opened the door to, lol.
shareHow badly you got under my skin? You mean like a blood sucking leech? Well played, db.
shareHah! You just stupidly shot yourself into the foot again. Scroll down in this article to where it speaks of attention whores being "energy vampires." http://thebachelorettediaries.com/2018/05/identify-and-eliminate-energy-vampires/
shareThe bigger story here is that you sent me an article from "The Bachelorette Diaries". I can't wait until you try to defend this by sending me a link to "The 90 Day Fiance Notebook" and "Millionaire Matchmaker Chronicles".
shareSo, if this content had come from Field & Stream or Popular Mechanics it would be more credible? Women are incapable of deductive reasoning while yet always being renowned for their intuition? Take it up with Google if you don't like the source of information.
The fact that I often get such a quick response from you is just more evidence that you are indeed an attention whore and hence, an "energy vampire." Also, it's no small coincidence that I made a mental connection to you and Renfield months ago.
So, if this content had come from Field & Stream or Popular Mechanics it would be more credible?
The fact that I often get such a quick response from you is just more evidence that you are indeed an attention whore
Also, it's no small coincidence that I made a mental connection to you and Renfield months ago.
You're just obfuscating, your favorite tactic, once again. Wait, you don't like that efficient "long word." You much prefer "muddying the waters", "confusing the issue", all the while masquerading as logic. You've presently been doing the same thing with kowalski and sslssg here, just dragging your face-saving arguments out on and on, more evidence of being an attention whore.
shareAgain, never said I didn't like long words. I said you use them to come off smarter than you really are. Where have I confused the issue or muddy the waters with sslssg or Kowalski? Sslssg and I are both having a polite discussion. Are we disagreeing? Sure, but that's it. Kowalski is just Kowalski. He's barely even human.
shareYou're all bitchy about my internet documented source of info about energy vampires and then randomly throw out this quote which I suppose is meant to be attributed to me: "Damn you sickening clique!" Where's the context to this obscure quote? Where's the link to where this came from?
shareObscure quote? You accuse so many of us of being in a sickening clique.
shareThere's that desperate, feeble, last-ditch effort of the oft admitted misanthrope here of trying to rally the very people he hates by default behind him.
shareThere's that lame excuse of claiming that I'm rallying people to come after you when you know very well you have called us a "sickening clique" many times.
shareYOUR A DICK...KICK HIS ASS, DB.π
shareAlready have, time and again. That's why he's so agitated with me.
shareYou're the one who keeps replying to me when I'm not talking to or about you. You even just claimed that I disgust you. Sounds like you have a bigger issue with me than I have with you. Your next response is going to start with "there's that..." and it will probably end with (eye-roll).
sharePutting your usual, deceitful spin onto things, especially my words. I actually said the "disgust" with you began long ago and you opened the door to that by gloating about disgusting the members here.
I also made the distinction a long time ago that a clique is a select few, but of course with your snakelike style, you just have to exaggerate and make it appear as if I'm referring to everyone.
I actually said the "disgust" with you began long ago and you opened the door to that by gloating about disgusting the members here.
I also made the distinction a long time ago that a clique is a select few, but of course with your snakelike style, you just have to exaggerate and make it appear as if I'm referring to everyone.
Reading confusion into my words when there is none and there you go again, with one of your arrogant, exaggerated claims, presuming to speak on behalf of the majority of members of the entire site. I'll bet there are hundreds here that aren't even aware of me.
sharepresuming to speak on behalf of the majority of members of the entire site.
And I think it's really weird how an admitted misanthrope could be so obsessed with one member's supposed popularity status. And then the desperate, convenient, go to allegation of trying to label me as a troll. If a member dislikes or criticizes samoanjoes, he must be a troll.
shareMe: "you're an asshole."
You: "Prove it."
Me: *sends you comments made in your post history*
You: "It's creepy that you're checking my post history."
Me: "You wanted proof. Okay, here are posts where people have called you an asshole".
You: "That doesn't prove it's most people."
Me: "Yeah because I can't send you DM's that were sent to me".
You: "Why are you obsessed with my popularity status?"
Me: "You asked for proof".
You: "Yeah, they're all part of a sickening clique out to get me."
Me: "You're the only person who claims to have a clique against them on this site".
You: "That proves how sickening your clique is".