The police were cowards in that Uvalde shooting.
What is the point of having police then? They sat outside and put more effort to tackling and arresting concerned parents rather than kill that 18 year old kid. They let those children die.
shareWhat is the point of having police then? They sat outside and put more effort to tackling and arresting concerned parents rather than kill that 18 year old kid. They let those children die.
shareMandatory cowardice thanks to you, the voter. Once it was a "hostage situation" they automatically have to follow certain rules. Rules that, if broken, will result in the same "de-fund/disband" rhetoric you espouse now. You know that if they charged in they would be labelled as "reckless and endangering those children" and talking heads on every news channel save one would be saying "The rules exist for a reason and we cannot have cowboys running our law enforcement."
Create rules.
Blame the consequences on others.
The rules changed after the 1999 Columbine shootings when police stood outside and let those 2 demons slaughter kids. That was the pivotal moment. Nowadays, the police is supposed to go in and kill the gunman at all costs. Police are trained in this ("active shooter" scenario).
shareBut it clearly wasn't a hostage situation, it was a massacre and they knew it. They violated their own policy by hanging back and letting him run amok.
shareIt was declared a hostage situation at one point (ie. someone told them that it was no longer an "active shooter" situation). Hands tied while the public, whom voted for the restriction, blames them. Had those policemen acted on their own agency, charged in, and a single child was killed during it, you know exactly what the narrative would be.
shareThat's nonsense. Go in there and do the job you're hired to do. I don't buy any of these excuses.
Funny how cops don't worry about the rules when they're killing unarmed black men.
Blame the bureaucrats!
"Go in there and do the job you're hired to do"
...
"Oh, and also ... you are not allowed to do A, B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I, J, K, L. M. N, nor P even if one of those is crucial to the success of the operation or even the actual "job" in question, you racist pig cops!"
Funny how the BLM narrative endures after being factually dis-proven and the organization itself collapsing under fraud and false pretense.
It is no wonder that police officers are quitting in droves. They all get punished for the 1 in 500,000 of them that are bad.
I do blame bureaucrats. Them and the hoards that follow their emotional narrative.
That's a load of bollocks.
With a gun and power comes responsibility. I have police officers in my family. I am not "anti-police".
Nah, the excuses being given by those chickenshit cops who let those children die do not stand up to scrutiny.
That would have been handled very differently by the LAPD for whom my nephew works. Children's lives were at stake.
No, you don't kill unarmed suspects. Yes, your job is to protect the public.
I would rather that the cops involved had said fuck it to the rules and gone in. Officers have been beaten down for years though. Not surprised that they went robot mode and obeyed. Disappointed, however.
You know .... YOU KNOW what the lead on the news would be if a single child was shot when they charged in during what would more vigorously be referred to as a hostage situation. The cops know too. We have fewer heroes. It is another situation where you get less of what you punish.
"the LAPD for whom my nephew works"
My best friend from high school works LAPD. I wonder if we have mutual friends from both the LAPD and from the Calipatria Prison. lol
Well I'm the only one in my family who's ever been in prison. I'm sort of the bad boy from a very straight laced middle class line. Lol. I've got academics on one side and police and firefighters on the other.
I'm wondering though if the Uvalde police were just in over their heads. It's a small town. The cops there are probably more used to crimes like petty theft and jaywalking.
I hadn't even considered actual failed morale checks by these cops. Comfortable local law, accustomed to nothing exciting ever, suddenly thrust into a deadly situation and being filmed. I think that you are correct that an organization like the LAPD would have handled this better. However, I am afraid of the possibility that they wouldn't have. Morale and motivation are both suffering there as in many other depts as I understand it. Fewer want to protect and serve a population that seethes with hatred for them.
I'd like to think that the occupation imbues the grit necessary to say "screw the consequences, I'm going in to save those kids!" Said consequences could be the eventual stomping out of that very grit.
I'm a preacher's kid and both of my parents have Masters. I've been in the middle of drug busts and partied with some hard crowds in my life. I understand Black Sheep (an older sister of mine was the Black Sheep. I learned the kung-fu style of Gray Sheep). I might have a similar kind of life exposure as you do.
Okay, sounds like you've been around the block a few times, like me.
I have noticed that my nephew has changed completely since becoming a cop. He's no longer the easy going friendly kid he once was.
There seems to be an all around lack of competence of American officials and institutions right now. The country does not seem capable of professional and decisive action whether it be law enforcement, military, medical and health officials, or national leadership. The competent, pragmatic country in which I grew up seems a shadow of itself today
shareNot to mention, too many fat people in the USA with obesity rates skyrocketing! I'm sure the military will have a hard time recruiting fit, healthy young men to join. And then the US military will be seen as a global laughingstock with only fat people joining because that's all they can find.
shareAs long as they can handle weapons and drones I don't think modern armies have to be super fit. Fat and strong is better than thin and weak.
shareYou are full of poor logic and bad information, and your nephew working for a particular department doesn't elevate them in any manner accept in your mind. They all have protocol, and recent anti police sentiment have forced them to be particularly compliant.
shareNo, the Uvalde cops were just chickenshit.
shareOK internet Rambo that still lives with his mom. 🤣
shareI'm only going by what I see on every news source from to internet to tv. Uvalde were a bunch of small town Mayberry cops who didn't have a clue what to do. Those children's blood is on their hands. That's what the hearings are about.
share
Amen!
🤨
They probably felt they had to waste time discussing options that would allow them to take the shooter alive. When you start things like defund the police and BLM etc And idolize a thug you then riot for its going to make the cops too cautious and the shooter in this incident was non white.
shareI don't doubt that there was dissent amongst the 19 cops in that hallway, some definitely wanting to storm the classroom door. They had been ordered by their chief to treat it as a barricaded shooter situation. The responsibility lies squarely with him. His head is on the chopping block and he knows it. That's why he's now refusing to cooperate with investigators.
shareI work in an emergency response role although not Policing. The worst thing you can do is micro manage and make your leaders and team doubt themselves which is what has happened now with all of the Woke/PC stuff. There needs to be an adaptive approach which allows a fast and effective response. That might change with each incident depending on various factors.
Something people, especially the media who just like to cause drama understand is that each incident is different in it's own way even if on the surface it appears the same as the last one of it's type. I mean incidents in general but in the case of school shootings, storming one place may be the way to go, perhaps another incident of it's kind calls for something different. That said, I would bet that the Chief was too occupied with politics rather than effective decision making.
Helluva story here. This good citizen could possibly have at least, minimized some of the carnage. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/uvalde-funeral-attendant-encountered-gunman-says-tried-go-was-held-bac-rcna32003
shareHe probably would have been charged with manslaughter or worse if he did shoot the guy!
I’m Aussie they always laud our gun control laws but I like that in the USA you can defend yourself and your property.
I also think they miss the point in the US. What is making people want to mass kill in the first place? Because you can take all the guns away but if the will is there they can just as easily use something else like a vehicle for example to mass kill.
I disagree. The media here is always quick to proclaim someone a "hero". He would have been an actual one, and in my mind, still is. He was ready to go back and confront the gunman after having been shot at several times and he didn't have the benefit of all the tactical, protective gear the cops had. That's guts, character, a lot of heart.
shareFair enough but the media aren't the Justice system as much as they may like to think they are. If the cops were threatening the mother who ran into save her kids with obstruction than someone who actually takes out the shooter may also be charged.
Common sense has nothing to do with it.
Of course there was no "common sense" in this incomprehensible evil act and how it was handled.
shareWhere's all that gun protectiveness. Thanks for nothing.
shareYes, they were useless, but that isn't the real problem. The real problem is that a batshit crazy 18 year old was able to get his hands on an AR-15.
shareAnd he was on live stream video on social media holding a bag of dead cats and bragging about it! He also threatened online to rape girls too.
CUCKOO....
I always noticed that. That the ones who usually commit these crimes tend to have a history of harming animals. That is a dead giveaway that this person is a psycho who needs to be constantly monitored....
shareOf course the only dangerous thing a person can handle in this country without proving their competence and responsibility and getting a license is a gun! You've got to be licensed to handle a car, explosives, trains, airplanes, chemicals, medicines, etc., but any dipshit with a criminal record and a bed reserved at the local nuthouse can get an assault weapon.
It's because the psychos and assholes donate heavily to the NRA, a lot of them know that they're the last people who'd be allowed weaponry in a sane system.
What makes you think an AR15 is any more dangerous than any other gun, or a homade pipe bomb for that matter. People that want to hurt people find a way. The worst school massacre in history didn't involve guns at all.
shareDear God, you're a fool. You're arguing FOR letting crazy psychos have assault rifles! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU!
Go away, and rethink every opinion you've ever had. Do not speak again in public until you've been cleared to do so by a panel of people with some common fucking sense.
I didn't say anything of the sort, so you had to embellish my comment so you could go into your weak, faux outrage, and you clearly don't know anything about guns. I also notice you couldn't refute my factual statement about the worst school massacre, so you simply ignored it. Are we done, or should I own your ignorant ass some more?
shareNo, really. Go rethink your entire life.
shareI am yet to hear that earlier intervention would have saved lives.
sharethe armed guard at the parkland, florida shooting never did anything either. it's easy to talk tough when it comes to guns.
shareThis is a longer video, at about 15 minutes long, but Legal Eagle lawyer Devon Stone breaks down what the courts have ruled on police protection. I found it interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWqLxTatndU