MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Aspect Ratio Poll

Aspect Ratio Poll


Cropped or stretched to fill the TV screen vs Shown the correct way.

reply

❌ Cropped or stretched to fill the TV screen
✔️ Shown the correct way

No cropping, stretching, pan-and-scan, time-compression or any other tampering with the format. A film should be shown uncut and displayed as it was intended. I will not purchase any movie that has been altered or edited. The only exception I will make is for Director's Cuts.

reply

“ A film should be shown uncut and displayed as it was intended”

I agree and would like to add (although nothing to do with aspect ratio): no cell phones while watching a “film.”

reply

It would be nice if theaters and restaurants would install cell phone signal jammers. Unfortunately this technology is illegal.

I usually just wait until a movie is released on Blu-ray or DVD. There's no film that I absolutely must see the minute it comes out. I can wait a couple of months if it means being able to watch it at home in peace. The popcorn is cheaper, too.

reply

Are you kidding me? It's perfectly legal to make a cellphone jammer, all you need to do is build a big metal cage in the walls of the theater. The place I work has such a meeting room where you don't get any cellphone reception due to how it was built. Kind of a "we know you want to use them, so we made certain you couldn't."

reply

It's true, it's actually illegal in the U.S. in public places like restaurants. A private company might be an entirely different matter since it isn't frequented by the general public. Reasons given are that it would interfere with police radio and 911 service.
https://www.fcc.gov/general/jamming-cell-phones-and-gps-equipment-against-law

reply

When a movie I start to stream fills the screen I go to IMDB and check the ratio. I also FF pass the opening credits on widescreen movies because sometimes movies will show in widescreen during the credits and then crop to fill the screen afterwards.

reply

People who crop or stretch should face criminal prosection and should be punished to the highest extent of the law.

reply

Hear hear!

reply

Shown the correct way, of course, with very few exceptions. An example of a well-done aspect change from 4:3 to 16:9 is Seinfeld.

reply

Shown the correct way: no cropping, no stretching, no pan-and-scan, and no colorizing black and white films/TV shows.

reply

Colourization is down right awful. The way you shoot monochrome is different from the way you shoot color. These aren't color films that were shot with the limited technology of the time, these are monochrome films that maximized the utility of the medium they were shot on.

reply

I crop 2.35:1 and 2.39:1 to 2:1.

reply

good on ya!
I dont mind trimming a little of the edge to get a "bigger" picture

reply

Cropping and stretching are two different evils
Stretching being far far worse.

reply

Cropping is the worst of them all, at least you can fix a stretch, you can't restore destroyed content.

Heck, look at the fiasco disney created when they cropped out the jokes in The Simpsons. Cropping is down right evil and should never be allowed (except by the director, the new "remastered" versions of Friends where extras are being shown despite the director cropping them out intentionally)

reply

ok , good point , if you've got the facility to un stretch

if you had to live with it though, stretch is unwatchable for me .

reply

If a movie or tv show was made in widescreen show it in its OAR. If a tv show was made in 1.33:1 OAR it needs to be shown as that. The Old episodes of the Simpsons cropped and stretched along with the HD remasters of Baywatch are terrible being presented in that way.

reply