Both movies are full of lies, but both are entertaining. At the end of Executive Action is a prologue about the "mystery witness deaths," claiming that the odds of those people dying by 1967 was something like 100 trillion to one.
When the federal government needs technical assistance, it calls on firms in DC because they're conveniently close. When I was working in DC one of my friends worked for an actuarial firm there. He told me the story behind that statistic. When the House Select Committee on Assassinations did its work in the 1970s, it called on his company to verify that statistic. He didn't do the work on that project but it was well known around his company, and the story was also in the committee's public records.
In 1967, a London newspaper had hired an actuary and asked, what were the odds that the Warren Commission witness who had since died would have died by that date. The actuary figured the odds and gave it to them, and they printed it. But after the paper hit the stands and the actuary saw the full story, he called the paper back and told them that they had asked him the wrong question. They had asked him what the odds were that those specific people, fifteen or so, would be dead by 1967. The correct question to ask would have been, what were the odds that any fifteen of the witnesses would be dead by 1967, and those odds wouldn't be extreme at all.
The paper pulled the story immediately. It had appeared in that UK edition, but didn't appear in the same day edition it published in the US. But the story had been printed once, and for years afterward the conspiranoids promulgated it as proven fact.
As for JFK, ever notice this? There's a scene where Garrison and one of his crew are in the TBSD sixth floor, looking out Oswald's window. They muse about how the first shot would always be the most accurate, because the shooter would have time to prepare and would not be rushed as with subsequent shots. They also comment about Oswald's Marine Corps record and say he was a lousy marksman. Sounds reasonable, right. But then near the end, in the courtroom scene when Garrison narrates "what really happened" over the Zapruder film, as the team of world class shots begin their work, they miss the first shot.
That's how hucksters get away with their lies. If two things contradict each other, just don't say them at the same time, and many will never notice.
reply
share