I agree. Many other sites, not naming them, seem to have a policy of only using moderation as a last resort against posters who have lost their mind and are spamming the board, making threats, engaging in disgusting, nasty and personal insults against the owners or just are so unpleasant to the point that everyone realizes they have to go. If you're running a site like a business, this has to be the way things are done.
If you're running after posters like we're in kindergarten again, that's a problem. If you can't even have a conversation because the mods are Stalin and you have to agree with everyone else and can't "yell" at someone, I'm sorry, we don't have to deal with this. It's not North Korea, it's a message board, there are scores of other ones on the internet that I can go to.
What I tend to find is that a lot of mods react to complaints in the most extreme manner and take the side of the person or people who made them. There's a lot of cowards who are just plain stupid and resort to snitching because they were embarrassed and can't win. Some of these posters are just movie studio shills running to the mods, using them as back-up.
There was a site called worstpreviews that went down. They had like four or five retards who dominated the site and were just weird. After some WEIRD back and forth posts over a certain amount of time, I gave up on the site and stopped going. I can't remember what they were doing, but they were just messed up guys. They drove people away. What's funny is, I've never really seen a movie site go down, and they were one of the decent ones, but their commenters just killed them.
reply
share