the sickness continues
shareI'm so glad these disgusting Dummycrats keep digging themselves deeper and deeper down the hole. Now they'll never win the presidency back. : )
shareGriffin's photo was wrong, as was O'Donnell's comment in this case, but sorry; no way that kid thought the photo was real. That's more cheeto propaganda
shareI have to agree.
Any normal 12 year old in America has seen enough movies and tv shows with special effects that they know it's not real. He's a kid, but not an infant.
Maybe if he was 5 years old, THEN I might believe he thought it was real. But not a 12 year old.
It was still wrong, but they are just using the child as a way to make it seem worse.
Exactly. With all the idiotic crap his father has done and said, there's stuff he should be far more horrified about
shareThat's like one of the first things you teach kids when they start watching movies. This is all make believe, nobody got hurt or killed for real, this is all fake so don't try to do it yourself, etc. Every kid knows this.
It still could have made him upset even if he knew it was fake, I will buy that, but I will never believe he thought it was real. it's pure covfefe.
He's not normal. He's the son of a billionaire who probably is heavily guarded, babied, and sheltered. Get some damn perspective.
shareHe just turned 11. He's still a kid and it was still a horrible, graphic image of his father.
You don't know how it could have affected him.
What?! I thought you guys claimed he was autistic???
sharewho is "you guys"?
shareYou take what I said personally? I mean O'Donnell and those who feel the need to refer to Trump with words like "cheeto", i.e. immature liberals.
shareI just don't know who you are referring to by "you guys". You used a plural and you replied to a thread with two people in it, so it could mean either or both of those two people. But it sounds like you don't mean either napsdufroid or I said that he was autistic, you mean Rosie O'Donnell said it.
I can definitely say that I am not Rosie O'Donnell and I never claimed Barron was autistic. I think the odds are that napsdufroid is also not Rosie O'Donnell.
So in this case "you guys" means "someone who is not in this discussion and will never see your post".
No, my comment was a reply to napsdufroid, so directed at him and those like him. I don't know about you, but he seems immature enough to have accused Barron of being autistic.
shareYou said "you GUYS claimed" not "you claimed". You used a plural and there were two people in the discussion. It's logical to wonder who the "guys" was referring to.
I've never seen napsdufroid claim that Barron was autistic, at least not in this thread. I don't know if he's said it in any other thread, but it sounds like you don't know either if he's ever said that, and you are just assuming it's something he might have said.
Yes, immature liberals like him and O'Donnell. If you're not one of them, then no need to take it personally.
shareYou are still holding him responsible for something you don't even know if he ever said or not.
That would be like me saying you are responsible for the most extreme statements of Milo Yiannopolis without me ever seeing if you have repeated them, endorsed them, agreed with them, etc. If you aren't Milo, you aren't responsible for the things he says.
If nobody in this thread is Rosie O'Donnell, then nobody in this thread is responsible for the things she says.
The whole "you people" argument is a logical fallacy.
Hold people accountable for their OWN actual words, not for other people's words..
These immature lying cons...
shareYou're trying to be nap's knight in shining armor or something? My over the top reaction made pretty clear I was mocking him for being immature instead of making an actual accusation. I'm not going around the boards talking trash about people who happen to have different political views. Save your faux sense of injustice for the next time an immature liberal does something inappropriate again.
shareI'm not anyone's knight.
I'm trying to have a rational discussion and you are making strawman arguments and debating against things that nobody in this thread has ever said. You lose credibility when you that. If you want your arguments to be taken seriously, then use rational truthful arguments.
If napsdufroid is really that bad, it should not be difficult to respond to the bad things he's actually said, instead of blaming him for things Rosie O'Donnell says.
How am I having any kind of discussion with you? Napblablabla is being immature and I mocked him and people like him. I thought it was already clear it had nothing to do with you? But if you want to defend a guy who constantly insults others...
shareHolding people accountable for the things they actually say.
That's not defending. If a person never said a thing, he does not need a defense for it. One only needs defense for the things they have done, not for the things they have not done.
But if you did actually say something, then you should be accountable for it and not try to weasel out with ad hominem attacks.
Example: You did actually say "you guys claimed" Barron is autistic.
And we've established that he's never said such a thing.
And your defense, it seems, is that because the person you aimed that falsehood at is immature, then you can say anything and it doesn't have to be truthful.
That's not how any of this works...
My point was not to hold him accountable, but simply to mock his immaturity, which is pretty much at the same level as those who claim Barron is autistic. Now please stop acting like I was posing for the camera holding nap's severed head.
sharefalse analogy is another logical fallacy.
Example of a false analogy:
That your accusation towards another poster is the same as holding a fake severed head.
You are literally racking up every logical fallacy, one after the other.
Ad Homniem
Ad Ignorantum
Hasty Generalization
Straw Man
Red Herring
Begging the Question
Tu Quoque
All you need is "no true scotsman" and you'll fill the bingo card.
Again, there was no argument, I simply gave a reason for mocking him the way I did. Please learn the difference.
I do wonder why you're not showing the same outrage whenever nappy boy insults someone again....
And your reason was shown to be nonsensical. But like a true trumphead, you'll continue to deny you lied like a cheap rug.
shareWhy are you crying? Need a nappy, nappy boy?
shareNot crying at all, chump. Why are you still lying instead of having the stones to admit you made a totally baseless assumption, coward?
shareYou must also be autistic.
shareYet another baseless assumption from the proven lying coward.
shareWoah! Hold the phone!
A few posts ago you said,and I quote.
I don't know about you, but he seems immature enough to have accused Barron of being autistic.
Those who called Barron autistic certainly meant it as an insult.
I certainly didn't claim I was being mature with that comment, but I'm genuinely wondering what nappy's issue is based on his interaction with me and others. I'm not calling a young boy names because I disagree with his father.
Exactly what names did I call him? You're challenged to post them, or admit you're a lying coward. No middle ground. Prove it.
shareYou need to learn how to read, crying baby. I wasn't talking about you.
shareThen, who, exactly, were you talking about, lying coward? You need to grow a pair and admit you don't know the difference between fantasy and reality
shareThat's pretty obvious. The people Dazed was comparing me with, those who called Barron autistic. You couldn't possibly be one of them, right?
shareOnce again, avoiding the fact you're a lying coward. Hmmm...you SEEM to be the type who could be a child molester. Guess that makes you one. That's your BS logic.
shareNot avoiding anything. I said multiple times it was a question, not a claim.
Your assumption is really silly, because I didn't abuse anyone here. You, however, love to insult and call people names around here.
My assumption has as much basis in fact as your so-called question does, therefore if it's silly, so was that. By alleging that, you began insulting people. Sorry, your BS isn't going to change the fact you're a lying coward, no matter how many times you try to change your rhetoric.
shareExcept that I haven't molested anyone around here, while you constantly insult people on this website. Your comment also concerned Barron.
As soon as I start molesting others here and I tell people to leave Barron alone because he's just a child, you can ASK me if I'm a child molester. If I start crying like a baby, then you can call me out on that.
Repeatedly calling it a lie, won't magically make it so.
"Repeatedly calling it a lie, won't magically make it so."
Doesn't have to. You've proven you;re a lying coward more than once. Nice try.
My comment concerned him, didn''t insult him. See? You can't not lie, coward.
Now go have mommy change your diaper. I've wasted enough time on your worthless butt.
God, you're dumb. My comments did not concern (child) molestation, so your accusation would be ridiculous. You do love insulting people and said Barron should be more upset about his father. Not that unwarranted to ask if you insulted him before.
You really need to prove how a question is a lie.
[deleted]
And I never did claim that. Stratie's just another example of a con who simply creates his own facts as he thinks they should be. And then he has the cojones to call others immature. Pathetic. He "seems" like the type who might be a lying imbecile.
shareYou're a special kind of snowflake, aren't you?
shareAnd you're a special kind of lying moron. No; take that back. You;re a common garden-variety lying moron.
shareNope, not a liar, just pointing out how despicable you are. Now go pork porky Rosie.
shareYeah, actually, you are a liar, not to mention a coward. And please post where I said I agreed with O' Donnell. You're challenged. Gonna prove it, or run away like the little bitch you are?
shareNo need for me to prove it, you're doing a fine job yourself.
shareI haven't proved anything as far as my agreeing with O' Donnell. Anyone is welcome to check my posts. But your doing a fantastic job of proving you're a liar and a coward.
shareJust keep crying and soiling your nappy.
shareStill not crying at all. But you remain a lying coward. Where, exactly, is your proof I said I agreed with O'Donnell? Until you can back up your claim, everything else you say has zero credibility.
shareBut crying babies who can only insult people they disagree with are credible?
I didn't claim anything, I asked you a question. Learn the difference.
Still not crying, and you constantly repeating it doesn't magically change that. But it's apparently all you have, because your credibility remains zero.
"I didn't accuse you of anything"
Oh, but you did...and began the insulting by referring to me as immature.
Once again, proving you're a liar.
And you still can't prove your other claim, cementing the fact you're a coward.
There's the truth (what was actually said), and there's lying (pretty much most of what you post). Learn the difference.
What you're doing right now is crying.
I said, "I thought you guys claimed he was autistic???", which is a question. You can either answer with a yes or a no.
Nope. Only crying in what passes for your imagination.
The question was answered, by several people, myself included. But you were too cowardly to admit you lied. Then you posted "I'm genuinely wondering what nappy's issue is based on his interaction with me and others. I'm not calling a young boy names because I disagree with his father."
So , for the second time, where did I call him any names? No BS rhetoric. It's not working. Either prove your claim, or admit you're a liar.
How can other people answer that question for you? Are they your sock puppets?
If you don't like me asking such questions, perhaps you shouldn't be so immature to insult people just because you disagree with them, huh?
So, did you call Barron autistic???
"How can other people answer that question for you?"
Easy...they can read, and they didn't see anything toi support your BS.
And perhaps YOU shouldn't be so immature to insult people because YOU disagree with them....as you did by making a false claim twice.
How can they possibly know what you've said on other threads and websites?
I did not insult anyone I disagreed with, I asked a mocking question (there was no claim except that you're an immature liberal), because you love to insult people just because you disagree with them.
Nice try. We're talking about this site, so that's total BS. But you're welcome to find any example I posted anywhere of calling him any name.
"I did not insult anyone I disagreed with"
Wrong again, coward. That's exactly what you did.
,
"I asked a mocking question (there was no claim except that you're an immature liberal)"
That's called insulting someone you don;t agree with, lying coward.
,
"because you love to insult people just because you disagree with them"
And the lying coward continues to assume. No; I insult people who deserve to be insulted because of how they act.
I was NOT talking about this website. O'Donnell and others calling Barron autistic was months ago. I simply grouped you together with them, just like you love to do.
You're a liar. I've seen your posts. You call people names just because they don't share your views. Me mocking you had nothing to do with your views. I don't see how it was an insult either.
Yeah, you were. Still lying. And you;re just gonna continue to lie. But you're challenged again to prove your statements
shareYou desperately need to learn the difference between a lie and a question (among other things). The question mark is a hint...
shareAnd the rest of your nonsense was lies and innuendos. But again, being the lying coward you are, you can't grasp that.
We're done here, ace. I have a real life to attend to. But you can keep talking to yourself.
It's certainly no lie that you're an immature liberal who constantly calls people names because they have different views. If
that's your "real life", then good luck!
sick
shareKathy and Rosie should share a cell together at the nearest mental hospital. They're both in dire need of one!
shareAmen.
shareBarron Trump is just a child for heaven's sake. It would be traumatizing for any child to see a lifelike depiction of one of his parents being decapitated. Does Rosie have no empathy for a kid? She has kids herself.
Interesting how this was "no big deal" for Barron but college students need safe spaces and you dare not "trigger" them with "microaggression", whatever the heck that is.
I recall a few months ago, right after the election, much older college "children" were hysterical after Hillary's loss. They were given counseling, safe spaces, therapy dogs and warm milk and cookies to deal with their awful trauma!!
Can't people cut Barron some slack and admit that it's awful for any child to see a bloody replica of his father's head?
Apparently they can't. They only care about their own kind.
shareSo true pj! 🥛🍪🍪🐩
shareGuess Barron inherited the Trump IQ.
shareWhy resurrect a 5 year old thread? To stir the shit?
It's old news. Rosie is no longer relevant. No one cares what she has to say.