Nominate the person who tells the most lies. Some people are out of control with the amount of lies they tell. I'll update this thread to keep track of who gets the most votes. Cast your vote now.
Keelai: 8 votes
filmflaneur: 4 votes
JBran: 1 vote
KingBob: 1 vote
. Filmflaneur is making a bit of a comeback.
I haven't seen this individual since, well, I put he or she on ignore. Probably over a year ago.. I have 25 of them on ignore as they float around the Phantom Zone spouting nonsense and I can't see them nor read their comments and I'm good with this
shareRustyShackleford
I haven't seen him in some time but that guy is not only full of shit, he spammed me with "evidence" via pm everytime I disagreed with him in a post until I finally had enough and blocked him. When I unblocked him months later he had already thankfully stopped posting here.
how about someone active?
shareTrentinQuarantino comes to mind, though he may just be a moron rather than a liar.
I think you want me to say Keelai, but I don't believe that labeling Keelai as a liar is accurate. He is someone with extremely unconventional views that likes to stir the pot with seemingly outrageous statements meant to draw out confessions of ill will, but I don't believe Keelai's intent here is to spread lies.
I also personally believe that the likes of flimflam posting source mined search results, as if they somehow objectively validate the subjective claims that they make, is more dishonest than anything Keelai does.
I also personally believe that the likes of flimflam posting source mined search results, as if they somehow objectively validate the subjective claims that they make, is more dishonest than anything Keelai does.
The thing is, what I said is that this is "my personal belief."
You can state your own beliefs ad infinitum, but they will still be nothing but your beliefs.
Indeed. Hence the need for substantiation and sources, especially for the more egregiously controversial claims. In suggesting that what one says is anything more than just one's beliefs lays the dishonesty. I am glad you agree.
shareFF do you have a vote?
shareThis sort of thing is not for me, thank you. But I am enjoying the partisan notoriety, and it seems to work for you.
sharecongrats you kept that response under 3 paragraphs. Wait until amerigirl responds. I've asked her simple questions before and she types 7 paragraphs.
I admire your restraint.
shareAs much as you endeavor to list the argumentative fallacies of others, you would do well to familiarize yourself with the "appeal to authority" fallacy before putting so much credence into the links you so readily post here.
shareThe 'Argument from authority' fallacy is an interesting case. It is a logical fallacy where someone argues that a claim is true simply because a perceived authority figure supports it, without providing any other evidence or justification. But in my case I hope I usually offer justification of my own, or evidence, before linking to authorities. In other words I might say something is true, just as my authorities say it is, and not because they say it is. Also there is some disagreement on how strong a fallacy it is. Some consider it a practical and sound way of obtaining knowledge that is generally likely to be justified when the authority is a credible expert in the relevant field and their opinion is supported by evidence, rather than relying solely on their status or reputation. Arguably a lot of school books and academic work offer or represent a continuous appeal from authority, while the religious commonly use an appeal to scripture (God) to assert their eternal truths. It is also the way the legal system works (precedent or constitution).
shareFlimflam, and I sincerely hope you don't take offense to me calling you that because I actually think it's about as great of a moniker as you can hope for, this is the one time I wish you had chopped up your post like you usually do.
Posting links is pretentious and worthless because of the capacity to find virtually anything that backs up virtually any belief one may hold. If you wish to edify yourself through reading articles of that sort, that may be a good thing. Posting those concepts here for discussion instead of the articles themselves, including a comprehension of the concepts to the extent that you can substantiate the claims with an understanding of the concepts that they are founded on, isn't.
That's your major issue and why you have such a detractive presence on the forums. Your pretentiousness outweighs the snippets of any arguments you make, in one liners as you chop up nearly every post you respond to into fragments that can be taken out of context.
Posting links is pretentious and worthless
the capacity to find virtually anything that backs up virtually any belief one may hold.
If you wish to edify yourself through reading articles of that sort, that may be a good thing. Post those concepts here for discussion instead of the articles themselves, including a comprehension of the concepts to the extent that you can substantiate the claims with an understanding of the concepts that they are founded on, isn't.
such a detractive presence on the forums. Your pretentiousness
Oh dear, skavau. Proven guilty.
shareSo is it Trentin or FF? Try to keep your answer to a few words.
shareClownBaby we've had a tiff or two, but let's keep it civil, and by that I mean please don't make suggestions of that sort. If my post is too lengthy you're welcome to not read it.
I think that Trentin may intentionally lie, but the likes of flimflam are more subversive in their dishonesty, intentional or not. I suppose you can decide which is worse, but the partisan appeal to authority bothers me more.
Just a reminder that, if you going to try and do a Trump on your most effective opponents, then the terms of these boards include an undertaking that 11. 'you will not use any information gained from the service in order to harass.. or abuse another person'.
https://moviechat.org/terms
Now, I'm not bothered. I've had two or three call out threads since I started out here a few months back, and find the repeated attention flattering. But who knows which other, less forgiving readers of your efforts may be out there?
👆🏻 Flimflam senses he might win this so goes for ‘I’m flattered’ and desperately tries to threaten Clownbaby with ‘you might be breaking site rules with all this…’ at the same time 🤣
Typical Skavau to cite MC terms.
shareWell spotted. Another point for Skavau-sock theory.
It was so funny when Skavau was posting about barely reporting anyone and a mod replied directly to the post and said that Skavau reports more people on this site than anyone else.
shareYeah, if only Skavau was still here eh?
shareBut he is here👆, there's no difference between the two of you.
shareJust get over it. He's gone.
shareNope.
shareNope; looks like you will still keep up with the trolling. LOL
shareOh dear...
sharehttps://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/67ae3f5dce430e3bae717c40/Germany-enjoying-more-cultural-enrichment?reply=67b0c1fb5864c518785d5455
This is the last time I will engage with your childishness. But don't let me stop you from wasting more of your time if it makes you happy. I am sure your Jesus will be proud of your antics.
Oh skavau, you waste your whole life in here.
shareYes, but now we've got you.
You may be the Dick Sergeant but you're doing well enough.
As I said before, I thought you were one of the better ones and am now disappointed.
shareI never claimed to be good, but why did that compliment upset you?
Dick Sergeant is a person, not an insult.
I rarely get upset and am not now. The context is you already having called me pretentious and dishonest here, I think. I can hardly be blamed for thinking you continue with sarcasm. But, whatever.
shareThat's probably good. I assure you that wasn't an insult.
I'm not sure I've ever even insulted you directly and definitely not recently.
Truth be told, I wouldn't respond to your posts as often as I do if I disliked you and you have also become a much more palatable poster since joining us.
I'm sorry, but being called 'flimflam' then 'the Dick Sergeant' is not so endearing as you think it is.
I'm not sure I've ever even insulted you directly and definitely not recently.
you have also become a much more palatable poster since joining us.
It is actually Dick Sargent. Sorry, I knew the spelling was a little different than sergeant.
shareApology noted; but you will understand after what you said about me earlier, it is treated with some scepticism.
That's all from me. I have better things to do than engage with such a personal and negative thread.
The Dick Sargent to Skavau's Dick York.
I believe we may be encountering a cultural barrier but this is the reference:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bewitched
That moment was just… priceless 🤣
I think that’s when Skavau finally said to himself ‘Fuck. I’m a busted flush on this site, all credibility is now down the toilet and I’m a total clown show. I’ll stick it out until the election but if Trump wins… I’m peacing outta here’
I think you're right that it was the beginning of the end, as funny as it was.
shareI am asking everyone's opinion. Is that still allowed you little fascist?
shareyou little fascist
Is that a yes or no? Are people allowed to give their opinions?
shareSorry; I thought the question was rhetorical as well as insulting. The answer is, obviously, yes. Unless (on this board) it amounts to harassment and abuse.
It does not mean opinions are necessarily right of course, as you often demonstrate. But if I ever say people are not entitled to their views subject to terms and conditions, please raise this again.
Thank you for allowing us an opinion. Try to remain consistent now and stop reporting posts.
shareTry and remain consistent now and stop reporting posts.
I saw in another thread you admitted to getting a few of someone's posts deleted? [Melton IIRC]
shareI think I know what you have in mind. There was an exchange once with him in which several of his posts vanished and he made accusations; but that was not due to anything I did, despite MeltDown's somewhat paranoid jumping to conclusions, which will no doubt be continued here. After all, if I was really that sensitive, there is no doubt far worse from his hand that I might have actioned against since.
These things are hard to prove I appreciate (and being on Liar of the Week, or whatever, I appreciate makes this rather ironic lol), but there it is. All I can do is say what happened.
Yep, Flimflam ran screaming to the mods to have a bunch of my posts deleted. I was calling out his ‘evasion noted’ hypocrisy and he didn’t want that going public so he resorted to censorship. He even tried to get me banned.
It’s ironic that in a thread about the biggest liars on Moviechat, Flimflam is trying to clear his name by… lying.
Keeliar is definitely #1.
Everybody else is clamoring for 2nd place. Flimflam, robofuckwit, Harlemglobetwatter, Thaishitonastick, Rorikumdumpster, moviesplatterer, KYbiker, Ranblowsself, Yatzocunt, etc., etc., ad nauseam.
Thank you.
share[deleted]
What's that about?
shareI was wondering the same thing.
shareArent you the knife collector who I talked to here about a year ago? I must be thinking of someone else?
share[–] ClownBaby (968) 41 minutes ago
Arent you the knife collector who I talked to here about a year ago? I must be thinking of someone else?
[deleted]
I don't recall. I knew the guy in that Instagram post. Not sure of the connection here.
shareFlimflam is the same person as Filmflaneur, right?
What did Filmflaneur say that makes him a big liar?
I don't know what else he talks about, but I just had a long debate with him about gender. He didn't do a good job defending his arguments, but I don't remember anything I would call lying.