MovieChat Forums > Politics > Two tier policing in the UK

Two tier policing in the UK


https://x.com/BillboardChris/status/1822056518155694396


20 months in prison for a social media post.

6 months for killing a teen with a machete.

The UK has gone mad.

reply

muslim lobbies have british politicians in theur pockets.

reply

https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/1819800805706457559


The Police are on the towelheads side.


Edit: Same guy here https://x.com/TPointUK/status/1819786776942190896

reply

the brits are nuts, how they can put up with all this? someone shown me a video yesterday of something happening in manchester, stabbings and acid thrown all in the same day.

it's always muslims

reply

muslims are worse than ass cancer.

reply

Can I see these videos of stabbings and acid attacks?

reply

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/breaking-manchester-police-cordon-three-33424995

now you change the subject and make it about me calling you a homo..

go on.

reply

So there was an event, and the police did something? Also how do you know the identity of those involved?

reply

so you didn't know there was an event, although you tell me and fellow americans we dont know shit about your country. yet i have to tell you something like this?

reply

I don't monitor every single event in the UK like some of the self-proclaimed "UK experts" on here appear to. No, I didn't know about this particular manchester event from 2 days ago. It's not big news here.

What's the cover-up here? Do you know something here that the Manchester police do not?

reply

>https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/1819800805706457559

Where do the police officers say there that they're there to protect them in the context that Tommy Robinson is implying? This is an out-of-context clip that Tommy Robinson could easily be completely misrepresenting.

And again: https://news.sky.com/video/uk-riots-men-jailed-after-clashes-at-anti-racism-protest-13193950

Why didn't you comment on this?

reply

you're a fan of immigration on these levels because you take advantage of young men who arrive in boats.

you take them in and offer them money to give you sexy massages.

reply

Are you back to baseless personal insults again? I never said that I was a "fan of immigration on these levels".

Provide evidence I do any such things.

reply

Do you think behaving like this and hurling baseless accusations at people like you do somehow endears other people to your position?

Are you unable to argue any point so you just devolve to baseless personal slander?

reply

you're here defending mass immigration, people say what their position is, you ask for evidence, they give you evidence, then you just call them "fascists"

dont you get bored of this you little queen?

oh thats right. it turns you on arguing with men.

reply

>you're here defending mass immigration

No. When did I ever defend mass immigration? Quote me.

>people say what their position is, you ask for evidence, they give you evidence, then you just call them "fascists"

When did I call anyone a fascist, specifically, in the context you're referring to here? Quote me.

>oh thats right. it turns you on arguing with men.

I see you argue across the forum. Can I say the same about you?

reply

i don't have a reddit account full of homosexual themes and an obsession with kids "transitioning"

i also don't spend my time researching "boy love" homosexual tv shows from fruity countries and pretend i've never seen them.

i've never been accused around these parts of being a nancy boy, you get accused of it every 4 minutes.

reply

>i don't have a reddit account full of homosexual themes

My reddit account is years old and contains all sorts of different posts. It doesn't have any such theme. Provide evidence that it is a "theme".

>and an obsession with kids "transitioning"

Provide evidence that I have an obsession here.

>i also don't spend my time researching "boy love" homosexual tv shows from fruity countries and pretend i've never seen them.

Googling them for a specific reddit post to a specific community is not "researching". And I have not seen it.

>i've never been accused around these parts of being a nancy boy, you get accused of it every 4 minutes.

No, I get accused of it solely by you and your cheerleaders. That's it. I'm fair game on here because I am left-wing and supportive of LGBT rights to exist in public. Anyone on this site who is left-wing, or progressive, or liberal in some way becomes fair game and all nasty conduct towards them seems to become morally permitted. That's it. In-group, out-group mentality. It's the right-wings version of fascist.

But you still did not answer my questions:

1. Show me where I defended mass immigration. Quote where I said it.

2. Show me where I called someone a fascist in the context you're referring to.

reply

now you're just flat out lying! you call someone a fascist in every post! "fascists who want me gone from this website because i'm left wing! but no! i wont go!"

like a good little homo you adore playing the victim, nobody dislikes you because you're left wing, they dislike you because of your annoying personality where all you can say is "evidence!" and your refusal to accept you're gay.

nobody looks up a genre of tv shows, that they have no interest in, in order to talk about them with people who haven't seen them either!

"hey conservatives of reddit! heres some gay tv shows from the other side of the planet, i haven't seen them, you haven't either, but heres a thread where we can discuss them at length!"

get the fuck out of here! you more than likely got turned on by the idea of discussing these things with dudes, under the guise of "wanting to know your opinion"

as gay as it gets

reply

>now you're just flat out lying! you call someone a fascist in every post! "fascists who want me gone from this website because i'm left wing! but no! i wont go!"

I have called many people here fascists because they outright express fascist ideals. And no, I didn't say that only fascists on here want me gone. I said that the right-wing bloc on here who don't like me include some fascists. There's a difference. It's quite apparent to me that many on the right-side of things here don't want any non right-wingers here based on how they conduct themselves.

>like a good little homo you adore playing the victim, nobody dislikes you because you're left wing, they dislike you because of your annoying personality where all you can say is "evidence!"

No. I've seen plenty of left-wingers here treated poorly by the regular users. Not just me. I'm just prolific, whereas they are less so. I also don't let-up and insist on claims being backed up. They tend to drop things, or don't respond as I do.

>and your refusal to accept you're gay.

I'm attracted to women. I don't need to "accept" anything here because I am not gay. I am me. You are not me. You know absolutely nothing about me.

>nobody looks up a genre of tv shows, that they have no interest in, in order to talk about them with people who haven't seen them either!

I've already answered this, time and time again. It was a single thread amongst many other threads on reddit that I've made specifically asking a community if they have a moral problem with those types of shows existing.

>"hey conservatives of reddit! heres some gay tv shows from the other side of the planet, i haven't seen them, you haven't either, but heres a thread where we can discuss them at length!"

No. Not about discussing them specifically. I've answered this repeatedly.

And I still want you to show me where I defended mass immigration. Quote where I said it.

reply

nobody looks up a genre of tv shows, that they have no interest in, in order to talk about them with people who haven't seen them either!

"hey conservatives of reddit! heres some gay tv shows from the other side of the planet, i haven't seen them, you haven't either, but heres a thread where we can discuss them at length!"

reply

>nobody looks up a genre of tv shows, that they have no interest in, in order to talk about them with people who haven't seen them either!

I have directly addressed this.

Are you going to provide evidence for your claim that I defended mass immigration?

reply

so you're against it?

reply

Correct. I want immigration numbers reduced. Most of the UK does. Labour has promised to do it. Whether or not they will? I hope so.

reply

ok, if you say it, i take your word for it (no sarcasm)

reply

So I'm lying here? Why would I lie here?

reply

"No sarcasm"

i wasn't being sarcastic. if you say you want it reduced, i believe you...

unless you're that obsessed with arguing, even when i accept what you say, you keep on...

reply

I thought the "no sarcasm" in itself was sarcastic. Fair enough.

But yes, you've got me wrong here. I think immigration in the UK is too high, most of the country does. But this doesn't justify the rioting in the last week or so. That's all.

reply

https://x.com/cwt_news/status/1822291979952070759


It continues.

reply

See now this is a reasonable thing to complain about. I don't like the idea of arresting people for 'fake news', or misinformation. It sets a dangerous precedent.

(Actual sources and context: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w6q611yn1o)

reply

20 months in prison for a social media post.

6 months for killing a teen with a machete.

The UK has gone mad.

reply

No, that's just not true. The other guy (the supplier) has already served nearly two years.

reply

You are still missing the point. You dont see a problem with someone who is capable of killing another person walking free on the street after two years?

reply

Sure. It's bad. But you can criticise our justice system, or our prison overcrowding that has led to this without making shit up. There's a lot of things to criticise the UK judicial system and police over. Making shit up simply doesn't help and discredits your position.

reply

You do get it. So stop acting so fucking dense.

reply

I've never ever claimed that the UK justice system is great. But simply that people are spreading misinformation, and that the rioters are rightly being arrested and jailed now.

reply

That and a social media post lands someone in jail for 20 months. It's absolute insanity.

reply

That's always been the case for incitement of violence online. Everyone is having the book thrown at them for this.

Normally incitement to violence online would not carry such a penalty. Neither would attacking a police officer get you 3 years in prison. But everyone is having harsh sentences for what they've done.

reply

why dont they get a harsher sentence for killing someone? Because the government is broken and run by morons.

reply

The actual killer in this case got nearly 10 years (although he died of his injuries, so it was reduced to manslaughter). This is the helper here.

reply

The fact that he got manslaughter shows you what idiots the people in charge of that case are.

reply

"More than 3,300 people were detained and questioned last year over so-called trolling on social media and other online forums, a rise of nearly 50 per cent in two years, according to figures obtained by The Times."

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/police-arresting-nine-people-a-day-in-fight-against-web-trolls-b8nkpgp2d

reply

So trolling is now against the law. I'm not surprised. The UK ramps up the fascism every year.

reply