Donald Trump losing to Kamala Harris in 3 national polls
No wonder Stephen Miller is freaking out during Fox News interviews.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-leads-trump-three-national-polls-1928451
No wonder Stephen Miller is freaking out during Fox News interviews.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-leads-trump-three-national-polls-1928451
There is honestly a good 30% of the population that does not even know her name. So I am suspicious of your polls to say the least. What the media will do now is try to create a narrative that she is rising like a phoenix after Biden's fall. They will push this very hard for a few weeks, through their internal polling they will see if it is working or not. If it doesn't get her any traction they will replace her at the convention.
Expect a blitz of bullshit polls and media fluff pieces. She might even save a kitten from a tree, just dont expect her to make a speech afterwards because she is more fucking incoherent than biden.
Ha ha ha! Incoherent? Hows this for incoherent?
"So I said, “Let me ask you a question.”
And he said, “Nobody ever asked this question, and it must be because of MIT, my relationship to MIT,” very smart.
I say, “What would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery’s underwater, and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there?”
By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. Do you notice that? A lot of shark… I watched some guys justifying it today. “Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were not hungry, but they misunderstood who she was.” These people are crazy.
He said, “There’s no problem with sharks. They just didn’t really understand a young woman swimming now who really got decimated and other people too,” a lot of shark attacks.
So I said, “So there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards or here. Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking, and water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted?” Because I will tell you he didn’t know the answer.
He said, “Nobody’s ever asked me that question.”
I said, “I think it’s a good question. I think there’s a lot of electric current coming through that water.” But you know what I’d do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark."
I'd rather get shocked to death than eaten by a shark.
shareIncoherent demented rambling at a campaign rally by Dementia Donnie. I rest my case.
shareThat's from a 3 hour campaign speech? Wow, Kamala cant do a five minute speech without getting demented. Maybe she will get better since Biden is gone, that dementia might be contagious.
shareThat demented ramble by Dementia Donnie went on and on and on and on. . . .
shareI'm glad Kamala's demented rambles are very short, she goes from Hello to incoherent jargon to a cackle and then awkward silence when her brain completely shuts down. They should bring back Hillary at least she was smart.
shareCompared to Dementia Donnie, all candidates seem smart. Gym Jordan even seems halfway intelligent compared to Donnie Dorko.
shareIs Jim Jordan known for being a gym hound? Is that why you wrote his name that way?
shareGym Jordan is known for certain escapades in the boys locker room of the wrestling team. That is how he earned the nickname in Ohio. He's also NOT known for being particularly intelligent, but when compared with Donnie, he seems smarter.
shareBut it was the doctor who was touching male students in the locker rooms not Jordan. If the doctor had been in drag you would find that behavior perfectly acceptable.
shareI can only tell you what they all say in Ohio and why they call him Gym Jordan. Evidently he told the irate parents, "I was only teaching them boys some new wrasslin moves."
shareThat 30% is all Republicans. They barely know Trump's name, let alone his wife's name, Malodorous.
shareNo, it really is not. There are tons of videos where random people on the street are asked about politicians and they have no clue or attribute policies to them that aren't theirs.
shareFunny how you are so suspicious of stuff, but you accept these random street interviews ... f-ing chump.
shareYou think they are all actors?
shareQuit telling me what I think. I doubt they are random but wahte it is it is not a real sample, and our media on both sides plays this BS game pretending it is by pandering to the brainless who point to it.
shareNote the use of a question mark. That means he was asking you a question. In context he was asking you to clarify what you meant.
YOu having a hissy fit was uncalled for.
I've seen a lot of vids too. They might be cherry picked, but I doubt they are all fake.
The Donnie And Malaria Comedy Hour, starring Donnie and Malaria Tramp.
shareNational polls do not matter ... how much does it need to be drummed into people's heads?
shareCome on! Don't you know polls are only accurate when they show the GOP candidate in the lead?
sharePolls can be tricky when we live in a system where thousands upon thousands of miles of empty prairie pick the POTUS, versus the votes of millions upon millions of actual voters.
shareMillions of low IQ minorities, uninformed midwits and rage heads (your category), and a healthy dose of pre-printed ballots override the will of what remains of the productive populace.
FIFY
Are you getting Rudy Julie Annie and Sidney Powell dusted off and ready for action? Are you getting your fake electors lined up? Who are you going to in order to "find" eleven thousand votes this time?
shareI don't care who wins the "election". Nothing fundamental will change. That ridiculous farce of a GOP convention was just the latest confirmation that surface level politics are all fake and gay (right up your alley). It's the system that needs changing, not the puppets who you mistakenly believe are running things.
But have fun with your "muh blue team!" gyrations.
"Millions of low IQ minorities, uninformed midwits and rage heads (your category), and a healthy dose of pre-printed ballots override the will of what remains of the productive populace."
It's unfortunate you didn't get a meaningful response to this. Instead you got deflection about Rudy Moody Yanni.
Meaningful reply from Fonzie Putin? You might as well ask your hamster to finish tomorrow's homework for you. Besides, he's probably too busy cruising the bushes at the nearest rest stop.
shareLOL!
shareAll three of those polls are aggregators from "FiveThirtyEight" showing Harris ahead by one or two percent.
This is the same "FiveThirtyEight" that had Hillary@71 and Trump@28, and yet, Trump won.
Polls from "Quinnipiac" and "Forbes/HarrisX" has Trump ahead of Harris between 2 and 6 percent.
Polling is tricky in a system where thousands of miles of empty prairie prevail over millions of actual votes.
shareNational polls almost always favor Democrats.
That's why Democrats always win the popular vote as well.
The fight is over the swing states.
That's why the Democrats wants to get rid of the electoral college votes in favor of popular votes.
shareDemocrats want to get rid of the Electoral College - BECAUSE DEMOCRACY ya dum fk
And so do most Americans. Why should the Economic Royalists have a mechanism to
short circuit democracy? Answer is: they shouldn't.
Why should the tens of millions of non-programmed Americans, who don't live in the dystopian metropolitan areas, be forced to forever submit to the pathologies of managerial elite.
Imtellectual midgets like yourself always think that the wisdom of your forefathers is worthless and that the world was awaiting your emergence to set things right.
Truth is, you don't even know what you don't know. To you, the word "democracy" is this feel-good notion, like "birthday cake" or "handjob", and it should be gorged on without remorse or restraint. Go read about the concept of "Chesterton's Fence", enlighten yourself as to why one shouldn't tear down existing structures without first informing oneself about why said structure exists.
Ah yes, of course, because instead the majority of people must be tethered to a geographically favourably positioned minority instead? Just because you call them programmed?
shareAre they tethered in your mind? Does not the globalist elite still control all the institutions of the United States? Is it your contention that even one, minor restraint on their power is too much?
shareI reject your framing of Democrats as inherently "globalist elite", and your implication - which I'm not even sure you believe based on your own history here, that the Republicans also aren't "globalist elite".
At least you admit it is fundamentally anti-democratic. Not that you give much of a fuck about democracy anyway.
Skavau's triggered, out comes the potty mouth.
I believe we have a uniparty, yes, but that doesn't speak to the concept of putting a (small 'r') republican brake on the mob rule democracy that you and others advocate.
Because I said "fuck"? Are you that precious?
>I believe we have a uniparty, yes, but that doesn't speak to the concept of putting a (small 'r') republican brake on the mob rule democracy that you and others advocate.
Mob rule = the majority or plurality of people electing the incoming government? What?
If you believe 50%+1 justifies any manner of depradation on the losing demographic, then I say you're vision of "democracy" is lacking in morality.
And your claim that Democrats (and most Republicans) aren't full-throated suppirts of the globalist agenda reveals your utter lack of knowledge concerning our politics. Stick to your side of the pond.
>If you believe 50%+1 justifies any manner of depradation on the losing demographic, then I say you're vision of "democracy" is lacking in morality.
When did I say it would justify "any manner of depradation" to them? I support checks and balances in any system that would prevent any kind of tyranny of the majority. You apparently think 50%-1 justifies "depradation" on the majority, by your logic.
>And your claim that Democrats (and most Republicans) aren't full-throated suppirts of the globalist agenda reveals your utter lack of knowledge concerning our politics. Stick to your side of the pond.
I'm not even sure what you specifically mean by "globalist agenda" in the first place.
What is wrong with a person who ...
1. Has no idea of my educational attainments, or IQ, calls me an intellectual midget?
2. Has to make us stuff about what I think to argue against?
To me, any post like this kind of retardation should be deleted and the account shut down on the first time. That kind of childish toxic behavior is useless, worse than useless, it drags everyone else down.
Indeed. How much better this board is when filled with cogent arguments like "Dems want to get rid of the Electoral College because democracy, you dumb fuck."
Physician, heal thyself.