Does the average conservative honestly believe that Biden is a child-sniffing pedophile with dementia?
Crazy isn't it?
shareCrazy isn't it?
shareHe did take showers with his pre-teen daughter didn't he? Weirdo for sure.
shareThat's wrong? I took showers with my dad back when i was little. Helped washed his back and he mine. Forgot what we talked about but I never considered it wrong but just family? If he was diddling my dick then okay, we have an issue here. Maybe it's different with daughters? I dunno. I mean if you're not doing anything weird, should be okay cuz FAMILY!
shareFucking weirdo
shareYeah, it's different with daughters. Sheesh.
shareAnd we are back to disagreeing with each other. Of course it's different with daughters! Especially if she was closer to 13 because that's a freshman in high school.
shareThat's the age Rorikon was when his dad helped him wash his back in the shower.
shareImagine you're a dad and you're in the shower with your 12-year-old daughter. You are both naked in the shower, just to be clear. Now your man junk is in her face and her boobs are probably just sprouting. Let's not even mention what's going on down there.
That whole thing is just all kinds of wrong and creepy on so many levels that I can't even continue. How on earth can anybody think that's ok and normal?
Pump the brakes man, pump the brakes!
shareLMAO...WHY WOULD YOU TYPE THAT OUT?🤣
shareMight want to check up on your old man dude.
shareHell yes it’s different with daughters! And, yes I believe Biden has a problem when it comes to little girls. He’s like a dog sniffing another dog in heat! I wouldn’t go so far to say he’s a pedophile…but who knows? I was taken aback when reading about him showering with his daughter and that would be of any age. I’m aware the Japanese culture is to bathe together, but it includes the entire family. Not one on one.
I do hope your daddy & son showers stopped by the time you were age 4. Beyond that a little kinky. We had 2 daughters. My husband stopped walking around in just his boxers when the eldest turned 4.
Does the average liberal actually just look the other way and ignore hours of video footage of Biden being a pedophile and clearly acting like someone with dimentia?
Look at interviews and speeches from Biden even 5 years ago. Night and day. The guy can’t even find his way into the WH now. He’s shits his pants constantly. Even on national TV with Anderson Scooper.
Compare that with Trump today and 30 years ago. Almost no difference. He’s still sharp as a tack.
That’s the facts jack.
Not crazy at all, it’s pretty factual as a matter of fact.
shareHe's definitely a child-sniffer. That's been proven on video. Whether he's a pedophile or not, that's yet to be proven.
But I wouldn't leave him alone with my kids. Would you?
As for dementia, you have to be in severe denial to think there's not something wrong with him. There are videos of him giving speeches throughout his career, and it's obvious to anyone with a brain that he no longer has the mental capacity he used to have. He can't get through a short speech without screwing it up, and that's even when he has cue cards in front of him.
And it's not going to get any better. With over three years left in his term, it's scary to think how bad it's going to get.
Perhaps you should turn that request for honesty back on yourself. You should be ashamed of voting for the man.
I think he has some secrets but I'm surprised he hasn't been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. According to the article below, FIVE members of Biden's family have been to rehab. I also posted a compilation video of Biden latching onto girls and keeping them close.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9717919/FIVE-members-Joe-Bidens-family-rehab-drug-alcohol-abuse.html
https://youtu.be/V4PLSPvJ9BY *** Compilation of Joe sniffing and groping ***
I posted another video of Creepy Joe getting blocked by a three-year-old. He was trying to touch/sniff her hair and she put her hand up. Somebody posted that Joe might be a tricophiliac and that's somebody who is turned on by the human hair.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/little-girl-defends-joe-biden-creeps-video/
It was when he was talking about his hairy legs and black kids. Too crazy..
shareDid they believe Hillary Clinton was on the verge of death?
They're nihilistic non-thinkers ruled by their id. Look at this board: There's not a lot of conservatism or honesty.
"Did they believe Hillary Clinton was on the verge of death?"
I don't recall that being a prevalent mindset. During the 2016 campaign, there were some questions about her health because she fell down a few times, but as for her being on the verge of death, you're making that up.
Either way, if you don't think Biden has mental problems, you've got your head firmly planted in your ass. And you shouldn't be questioning others' honesty.
The funniest part is when you idiots claim he just has a 'stutter'.
Your memory might be about as good as Joe Biden's. It became a major campaign issue. Here's an article addressing some of the lies: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/09/12/how-is-hillary-clinton-still-alive/
As I said at the time, I would not be at all surprised if Trump died before Clinton. He doesn't drink or smoke, but he eats like shit.
Joe Biden is in cognitive decline. He was never very sharp, and now less so. He's less dangerous than his mentally ill predecessor (malignant narcissism). There were characteristically insane conspiracy theories that Democrats were ready to 25th Amendment Biden and install Harris months after the inauguration.
"It became a major campaign issue."
Yeah, because you found one opinion piece. (Which I can't read, since it's behind a pay wall.)
That's funny.
"He's less dangerous than his mentally ill predecessor"
Pure TDS. It's idiots like you who voted for 'anyone but Trump' and left this senile bedwetter in charge.
And you have the nerve to ask others for honesty.
"Yeah, because you found one opinion piece. (Which I can't read, since it's behind a pay wall.)
That's funny."
What's funny is that you don't understand causality. Or remember the 2016 election.
"Pure TDS. It's idiots like you who voted for 'anyone but Trump' and left this senile bedwetter in charge.
And you have the nerve to ask others for honesty."
Again, some unintentional humor. You're repeating the same charge leveled against Clinton, except she didn't just wet the bed but allegedly wore adult diapers. Biden, who is not good, is better than Trump. I'm not sorry that the truth hurts. You live in a self-created prison. The help break free of epistemic closure, you might want to try subscribing to a reasonably good newspaper.
"What's funny is that you don't understand causality"
No, what's funny is you claiming "It became a major campaign issue" and then only using one blog post to prove your point.
By the way, I was able to read that article on my phone. It was written by a liberal who was sarcastically asking how Hillary could still be alive after all the maladies the right claimed she had.
Did you even bother to read it? Hahahahahaha!
Moron.
"Biden, who is not good, is better than Trump."
You must be really fucking delusional to think that. All the shit this country has encountered since Biden took office can be directly laid at Biden's feet. Even the fact that more people have died from Covid since Biden took office than died from Covid under Trump. I thought Biden was going to cure everyone?
But you just stick your head in the sand and ignore the fact we're being led by a guy who's brain doesn't work anymore. Can't even get through a speech with the cards right in front of him.
"I'm not sorry that the truth hurts."
You wouldn't know what the truth was if it botched the Afghanistan withdrawal and got our soldiers killed. Or if it continued to keep 'kids in cages' at the border after accusing Trump of doing the same. Or rejoining the Paris Accords and letting China continued to build hundreds of coal power plants while only 'promising' to cut back emission by 2030. Or mandating the Covid vaccine for Americans, but placing thousands upon thousands of illegal immigrants all over the country without forcing them to be vaccinated.
No, all you can do is ignore all of that and keep whining about Trump.
Pathetic.
Pathetic is right. The one article contains over a dozen links for all of the hogwild conspiracy claims. It's not difficult to use your Google machine and find many, many other articles.
Re: Biden as less bad than Trump:
Since you're not on speaking terms with reality, it will be difficult to impossible to litigate this in a few posts. I can point out a couple of things for your benefit:
"You must be really fucking delusional to think that. All the shit this country has encountered since Biden took office can be directly laid at Biden's feet. Even the fact that more people have died from Covid since Biden took office than died from Covid under Trump. I thought Biden was going to cure everyone?"
And what is "all the shit this country" has encountered since Biden took office? In terms of COVID deaths, you're either painfully dense, or not looking at matters honestly. Biden took office in late January when there was a wave of death. There's no magic wand to stop it, and it's dishonest to suggest Biden said he had one. As a point of comparison, you could look at is how many super-spreader events there were in the Trump White House.
It's also pretty silly to say, "I thought Biden was going to cure everyone" when a cure still awaits full approval and Trump supporters refuse to take the vaccine. I suppose he could mandate the vaccine for everyone, but that would inspire dumb opposition from your ranks.
"You wouldn't know what the truth was if it botched the Afghanistan withdrawal and got our soldiers killed."
You're just parroting talking points. Before the withdrawal, Trump bragged that he set a timetable that tied Biden's hands, and so on and on.
"Pathetic is right. The one article contains over a dozen links for all of the hogwild conspiracy claims. It's not difficult to use your Google machine and find many, many other articles."
And here we go, a dumbass moving the goalposts.
You said: "It became a major campaign issue."
No, Hillary destroying her emails and then bleaching her server was a major campaign issue. Pointing out Hillary kept falling down was about the same level as liberals claiming Trump wore a toupee.
"There's no magic wand to stop it, and it's dishonest to suggest Biden said he had one. "
Once again, you wouldn't know the truth if it smacked you in the face.
"So folks, I will take care of this. I will end this." -- Joe Biden during the final presidential debate held on Oct. 22, 2020, while criticizing Trump's handling of Covid.
"It's also pretty silly to say, "I thought Biden was going to cure everyone" when a cure still awaits full approval and Trump supporters refuse to take the vaccine."
Huh? You're saying the cure still awaits full approval, and in the next breath you're saying Trump supporters refuse to take the vaccine. Do you think that, possibly, those two statements might be related?
And a whole lot of people who aren't Trump supporters are refusing to take the vaccine. Stop the dishonesty.
"Before the withdrawal, Trump bragged that he set a timetable that tied Biden's hands, and so on and on."
Typical brain-dead Biden supporter. Trying to blame Trump for something that Biden's military advisors told him was a bad idea. Yes, Trump set a timetable, but he didn't come up with the fucked up plan of how the withdrawal would happen.
"And here we go, a dumbass moving the goalposts."
You're aping the language of people who are smarter than you. Both Joe's dementia and Hillary Clinton being on the verge of death are talking points from right-wing retards. They play an outsized role in your tribe's criticism of Democrats. The mainstream do not take people like you seriously because you're not a serious person.
You're also reduced to cherry-picking. You have ten seconds from a townhall meeting to demonstrate dementia? What about the other 90 minutes? Your clipped quote from the debate is an example of goalpost moving and general dishonesty. He was talking about ending the crisis, not COVID.
It's just one face-plant after another with you.
"Huh? You're saying the cure still awaits full approval, and in the next breath you're saying Trump supporters refuse to take the vaccine."
Christ, you're dumb. The vaccine is fully approved. The cure is not. The cool thing about vaccines is that it reduces your chances of getting COVID, which reduces your chances of passing it on, as well as reducing your chances of dying or becoming very sick if infected.
You suffer from delusions of competence.
"Both Joe's dementia and Hillary Clinton being on the verge of death are talking points from right-wing retards.
You're also reduced to cherry-picking. You have ten seconds from a townhall meeting to demonstrate dementia?"
Seriously? You really don't think I could find more?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj6kI2Fdc_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj6kI2Fdc_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Efgasga48to&t=37s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW3jhIw1QMw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_wlQZ5N_2k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNQAbF33gFM&t=73s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuIjn6EEIV8&t=32s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSMgkEYOtZw&t=45s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsIxP-c83ok
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBDkayBmSqc&t=25s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNUO3NWsmEY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi9FB0F-GhA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI9UtcFlpFc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-y_w0O5Bw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoVQ6EihvTc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve3i7ts-OXM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUnyB6GUTAY
I can post more if you need them.
You're in serious fucking denial.
"The vaccine is fully approved."
Wrong. The Moderna vaccine hasn't been approved, and the Pfizer vaccine wasn't approved until two months ago. So we're talking about almost the entire year without it being approved.
Stop lying.
You're beyond sad and weak. Joe Biden has always been a gaffe machine. Spinning this off into full-blown dementia is just another wacky conspiracy theory, which is how Trump got his political start -- feeding the whackadoos (that's you) birther nonsense. I remember right-wing freaks claiming for years that Obama sincerely believed the US consists of 57 states, and that he's a Muslim.
Re: Vaccine Approval and lying
"Wrong. The Moderna vaccine hasn't been approved, and the Pfizer vaccine wasn't approved until two months ago. So we're talking about almost the entire year without it being approved."
Holy shit, try reading for comprehension. There's a difference between *fully* approved and approved. It couldn't be mandated until given full FDA approval, which happened, yes, a couple of months ago, but many of us were vaccinated back in February and March. Some -- like Trump -- vaccinated even earlier. This is like Trump saying "many don't know Abraham Lincoln was a Republican." No, you're just the one who didn't know. The Pfizer vaccine was given full approval, and it's only a matter of time before the Moderna vaccine, the same one that has gone into millions of arms, is also fully approved.
Anyone American who wants the vaccine can pretty much get it, so I'm going to be as sad for the umpteen thousands of unvaccinated people who die after this year's holidays.
"You're beyond sad and weak. Joe Biden has always been a gaffe machine."
Liar. I posted a video of Biden from 1992. Here it is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZlzhULrJC0
If you think he's the same there as he is now, you're brain-dead.
And what happened to your claim I was 'cherry picking'? Biden fucks up on a daily basis. Check back in a week and I'll have plenty more to show you.
"There's a difference between *fully* approved and approved."
Wrong. There's 'approved for emergency use' and 'approved.'
Stop lying.
It is certainly understandable that people don't want to take a vaccine that hasn't been approved by the FDA.
And now the FDA is telling us they don't want to release the full documentation on how they approved it until 2075. Yeah, that sounds legit.
So, once again: "So folks, I will take care of this. I will end this." -- Joe Biden
"If you're fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask." -- Joe Biden
Did you believe that bullshit?
You have a talent for relentless stupidity. Your evidence that Joe Biden is not a gaffe machine is a two-minute clip from C-Span thirty years ago where he reads *prepared remarks.* Think about that, and reflect on your life choices.
It's readily apparent you came into this discussion with serious knowledge gaps that panic googling will not resolve.
>Wrong. There's 'approved for emergency use' and 'approved.'
>Stop lying.
Do you think this is some kind of argument? "Fully approved" has been the description in the reporting to distinguish from emergency use. You ooze desperation.
>"If you're fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask." -- Joe Biden
>Did you believe that bullshit?
Generally speaking, if you're fully vaccinated, and others are vaccinated, then you do not need to wear a mask. It's pretty wild that people will pass up a no-cost vaccine. And, of course, there was the Delta variant.
Immediately before Biden took office, right-wingers were claiming that Democrats and the media would declare the virus was no longer a threat, the economy would boom, and the libs would take credit. The Biden administration was gung-ho about hoping for a return to normalcy around the Fourth of July. The Delta variant changed that. Now right-wingers are back to claiming the evil designs all along were for expanded government control. I'm not going to ask if you believe that bullshit. You're already full of so much shit you should be condemned by city sanitation.
"You have a talent for relentless stupidity. Your evidence that Joe Biden is not a gaffe machine is a two-minute clip from C-Span thirty years ago where he reads *prepared remarks.*"
He's giving a speech. Something he can't do now without fucking up every minute.
You're living in denial. And what's funny, you're being stupidly arrogant about it.
"Do you think this is some kind of argument? "Fully approved" has been the description in the reporting to distinguish from emergency use. You ooze desperation."
Bullshit.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine
Approval Signifies Key Achievement for Public Health
For Immediate Release: August 23, 2021
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine.
“The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product,”
Now you're reduced to repeating yourself in caps. "Fully approved" is the colloquial usage that has pervaded press reports for months and months as a way of distinguishing between emergency approval. That you think you're scoring some kind of meaningful point simply underscores your desperate, sand-pounding stupidity.
As for Biden fucking up every minute -- I mean, that's objectively not true. You probably have not never met someone with dementia. The extent of the conspiracy wouldn't even make it a conspiracy. You'd have to believe doctors and citizens who watch and interact with Biden are suffering from mass delusion. Here's a more parsimonious explanation: You're just another idiot on the Internet talking out of school.
You don't know how to make claims you can prove.
Instead of "dementia" say "worrying cognitive decline."
Instead of saying "you're lying," try "that's false."
If you need more tips (and you do need more tips), then you should start paying me.
Quoting the CDC
>Joe lied to us.
This is kind of funny because the CDC blinded the Biden administration by lifting mask requirements prior to Delta.
Re: Right-wingers claiming the virus was a hoax to destroy the Trump economy, then changing narratives to say the left wants permanent govt. control of the economy...
>That's such a stupid things [sic] to say. Right-wingers said many things. Left-wingers said Trump was going to be another Hitler. Should I be quoting them to you?
This is a reasonable criticism. Inasmuch as you have not seen right-wingers make these sort of claims, the argument will not have much purchase. Ostrich-like behavior is really useful here. Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax." Or the cries about a lockdown.
""Fully approved" is the colloquial usage that has pervaded press reports for months and months as a way of distinguishing between emergency approval."
Bullshit. You're just making shit up. I posted from the FDA website.
Stop lying.
"As for Biden fucking up every minute -- I mean, that's objectively not true."
Okay, every two minutes.
If it was every hour, would it make a difference? He's still nuttier than squirrel shit.
"Instead of saying "you're lying," try "that's false.""
Nope, you're lying. Just admit it.
"This is kind of funny because the CDC blinded the Biden administration by lifting mask requirements prior to Delta."
Yeah, blame everyone but Biden. Typical.
"Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax.""
Another lie. Why do you choose to be dishonest?
"Or the cries about a lockdown."
The lockdowns hurt a lot of small business owners and it's never been proven they made a difference.
"Bullshit. You're just making shit up. I posted from the FDA website."
Christ, you're a retard. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22fully+approved%22+vaccine+covid&client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=AOaemvI-acHMQAuAfrMnIsbavaKlg4IE0w%3A1637654640125&ei=cKCcYaeMB4XP0PEP6dSpmAI&ved=0ahUKEwinhNv4gq70AhWFJzQIHWlqCiMQ4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=%22fully+approved%22+vaccine+covid&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgjECcyBggAEAgQHjIGCAAQCBAeMgYIABAIEB4yBggAEAgQHjIFCAAQhgMyBQgAEIYDMgUIABCGAzIFCAAQhgNKBAhBGABKBAhGGABQAFj8DmCGEWgAcAB4AIABaIgBwwGSAQMxLjGYAQCgAQHAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz
Re: Coronavirus hoax
I remember the fact-checkers on this one. Here are Trump's remarks:
"One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. We’re 15 people [cases of coronavirus infection] in this massive country. And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that."
Let's take for example the "impeachment hoax." It wasn't a hoax; it actually happened. Democrats didn't merely threaten to impeach him -- they DID impeach him. 2X. Trump would have to acknowledge that, yes, he was impeached. What he's saying is that the impeachment was based on non-credible grounds. Now that we have our stupid-to-English translators out, it's perfectly reasonable to infer that Trump here means that the Coronavirus is all blown out of proportion -- just like the "perfect" phone call was blown all out of proportion. He later says the press is in "hysteria mode," but Coronavirus is nothing to worry about because he has it under control and is doing such a good job.
So wait, I post a link from the FDA, who actually approved the vaccine, and you give me a Google search?
LOL! And I'm the retard?
"I remember the fact-checkers on this one."
Good. So they're all wrong and you're right?
Retard.
I said that "fully approved" was a colloquialism. You see all the links and articles where that exact phrase is used exactly as I said.
>Good. So they're all wrong and you're right?
This is not much of an argument. I explained why it's mistaken, and I'm not the only one who is right. As I recall, Snopes said the story was "mixed" and the articles that allow comments, you'll certainly find others taking issue with this case of both-sidesism.
Thanks for playing though.
"I said that "fully approved" was a colloquialism."
We were discussing why people weren't taking the vaccine. In that scenario, semantics matter when you're trying to mislabel 'emergency use authorization' as 'approved'.
Stop being a lying douchebag.
"I explained why it's mistaken"
Translation: "I gave my opinion."
Just proof your opinion has no basis in facts.
>We were discussing why people weren't taking the vaccine. In that scenario, semantics matter when you're trying to mislabel 'emergency use authorization' as 'approved'.
No. You didn't understand the difference between a cure and a vaccine. Then you said the Moderna vaccine was not approved, and then lamely tried -- and failed -- to seize upon the language of "fully approved."
>Translation: "I gave my opinion."
Just proof your opinion has no basis in facts.
This is instructive because instead of showing how it's wrong, you try to dismiss it as mere opinion. I think I understand why you must insist I'm a lying douchebag. It's your own self-hatred.
"Then you said the Moderna vaccine was not approved, and then lamely tried -- and failed -- to seize upon the language of "fully approved.""
Huh? The Moderna vaccine hasn't been approved.
Are you really this stupid?
https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=hcpeua&utm_term=bnd&utm_content=modernaapproval&gclid=CjwKCAiAv_KMBhAzEiwAs-rX1HD1j8dP8WCPVIAYxlg7MnBxZjcdQLVKGds1ZSuUEjyaxjnJzf8NQRoCVR0QAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
>Huh? The Moderna vaccine hasn't been approved.
It's like your deaf. We've gone over this already. It's approved for use. It's not fully approved, so it cannot be mandated.
>The fact-checkers I listed explained how it was wrong. Did you bother to read them?
Of course, that brings up the question of if you did read them, whether you have the mental capacity to understand what you're reading.
You lose the argument, so you're reduced to another lame meta-argument.
"It's like your deaf. We've gone over this already. It's approved for use. It's not fully approved, so it cannot be mandated."
No, it's not approved for use. I has been "authorized for emergency use." That's not approved for use. Once again:
The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
You're not saying anything new. In this post you're not even saying anything new in a new way. All of this has been refuted. You've beclowned yourself.
"And now you're tying to say that since Trump called the impeachment a hoax, it wasn't really a hoax because they actually impeached him."
Yes, Trump abuses language. His malapropisms are legendary. When he said coronavirus is a hoax, critics are not saying he believes the virus isn't real. He was saying the virus is not a meaningful/credible threat. And he was completely mistaken.
You're also, again dropping context. This was about MY claim that Trump said the pandemic was a hoax. That Democrats, including Joe Biden, may have said something is similar, is not dealing with the argument at hand. You're forced to go that route because you're incapable of thinking for yourself, and I wonder if you're even "tying" to.
"When he said coronavirus is a hoax, critics are not saying he believes the virus isn't real. He was saying the virus is not a meaningful/credible threat. And he was completely mistaken."
You don't get to make shit up. When he said it was a hoax, he was talking about how the Democrats were blaming him for it. Even all those liberal fact-checkers understood that.
You're either too stupid to understand that, or you're so biased you refuse delivery.
"This was about MY claim that Trump said the pandemic was a hoax."
Yes, it is. You're stupid accusation that doesn't make sense. You're saying it's comparable to his claim that the impeachment was a hoax, because you're saying he really was impeached, so it wasn't a hoax.
Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
>You don't get to make shit up. When he said it was a hoax, he was talking about how the Democrats were blaming him for it.
Wow, you're a sad, little person. Like Trump, all of the accusations are confessions. Instead of "making shit up," quote him. See, that's how claims work. You need to supply evidence. To make the task easier, I posted a portion of the relevant quotation above -- and it includes Trump flitting from topic to topic like a meth-addict.
>Yes, it is. You're stupid accusation that doesn't make sense....
Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
Yes, unfortunately, I do realize how stupid that sounds. If only you understood how stupid you sound.
"I posted a portion of the relevant quotation above -- and it includes Trump flitting from topic to topic like a meth-addict."
Actually, you took what Trump said and made shit up about what he meant by it.
This isn't rocket science, moron.
"I do realize how stupid that sounds."
Good. Stop saying stupid shit like that. The reason the Dems attacked Trump over the phone call was a hoax, just like the reason they attacked him over Covid was a hoax.
See? It's simple.
If you need help with the big words, let me know.
"Actually, you took what Trump said and made shit up about what he meant by it. "
This is yet another unproven assertion. Again, you need to back up your claims with evidence. Since this is about what Trump said, or, more specifically, meant, now is your opportunity to quote him and explain. But you can't do that.
"now is your opportunity to quote him and explain. But you can't do that."
Of course I can do that. Here is what you said:
"One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. We’re 15 people [cases of coronavirus infection] in this massive country. And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that."
Let's take for example the "impeachment hoax." It wasn't a hoax; it actually happened. Democrats didn't merely threaten to impeach him -- they DID impeach him. 2X. Trump would have to acknowledge that, yes, he was impeached. What he's saying is that the impeachment was based on non-credible grounds. Now that we have our stupid-to-English translators out, it's perfectly reasonable to infer that Trump here means that the Coronavirus is all blown out of proportion -- just like the "perfect" phone call was blown all out of proportion. He later says the press is in "hysteria mode," but Coronavirus is nothing to worry about because he has it under control and is doing such a good job.
Talk about asinine.
"When he was talking about Covid, he was talking about the Democrats' reaction to Covid. (Blaming him for every damn thing that happened.)"
So where does he say Democrats are blaming him for everything that has happened? Identify the sentence. You can't because you're so obviously trying to make shit up. You need check your timeline: At that point, he brags there are only 15 documented cases of infection, and, as I pointed out, later on he says the press is in "hysteria" mode. He was downplaying the virus, just as he downplayed the phone call.
Trump's on the record with Woodward later SAYING he downplayed it.
Re: Stopping flights from China
"That's you, admitting that the Democrat's reaction to the pandemic was to blame him for things he wasn't responsible for."
You can't read.
"So where does he say Democrats are blaming him for everything that has happened? Identify the sentence. You can't because you're so obviously trying to make shit up."
Yes, you're a fucking moron.
From here: https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-virus-outbreak-ap-fact-check-politics-joe-biden-1eea443cca46df5f18e61b7c34549da2
THE FACTS: The accusation and the selective video editing are misleading. At the rally featured in the video, Trump actually said the phrases “the coronavirus” and “this is their new hoax” at separate points. Although his meaning is difficult to discern, the broader context of his words shows he was railing against Democrats for their denunciations of his administration’s coronavirus response.
“Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus,” he said. “You know that, right? Coronavirus. They’re politicizing it.” He meandered briefly to the subject of the messy Democratic primary in Iowa, then the Russia investigation before returning to the pandemic. “They tried the impeachment hoax. ... And this is their new hoax.”
Asked at a news conference the next day to clarify his remarks, Trump made clear he was not referring to the coronavirus itself as a hoax.
“No, no, no.” he said. ”‘Hoax’ referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody, because we’ve done such a good job. The hoax is on them, not -- I’m not talking about what’s happening here. I’m talking what they’re doing. That’s the hoax.”
He continued: “Certainly not referring to this. How could anybody refer to this? This is very serious stuff.”
From the site:
"The broader context of his words shows he was railing against Democrats for their denunciations of his administration’s coronavirus response."
That's been the whole point. The coronavirus is a threat that Trump's doing a poor job handling. It's not that he believes Cornoavirus does not exist.
”‘Hoax’ referring to the action that they take to try and pin this on somebody, because we’ve done such a good job."
Man, you're just terrible at this -- unless you're trying to demonstrate my point. Again, the argument is that he's not doing enough. As sure as the sun rises, Trump will claim he's doing a good job -- a great job -- the best job. Trump gives himself A-pluses and says he has the best run administration in history. As far as the braying buffoon is concerned, the "hoax" is that he has not been doing a good job.
Trump is a retard-whisperer, and maybe Stupid is your native tongue, but once anyone realizes the idiosyncratic way he's using the term, all of this apologetics quickly falls apart.
"Again, the argument is that he's not doing enough."
Of course that was the argument. That's all the Democrats talked about. Trump didn't do enough. Trump was to blame.
Fuck, we just talked about how Biden had blamed him for ALL the deaths.
Are you that stupid you can't remember that?
So THAT was the hoax Trump was talking about. That the Dems were blaming him for it.
Seriously, are you retarded?
It's amazing that you find this empowering. If you understood anything, you should feel embarrassed.
Trump contended that fears of coronavirus were a form of hysteria. Except hundreds of thousands of people ended up dying. Trump did not take mask-wearing seriously and continually downplayed. He SAID he downplayed it.
As for Biden blaming ALL of the deaths on Trump, I've talked about this separate issue multiple times, speaking in conditional statements to cover every possible angle.
You don't even understand the origins of these different threads, or that the pandemic "hoax" was triggered by my off hand remark. Maybe you're suffering from dementia.
"Trump contended that fears of coronavirus were a form of hysteria. "
Actually, he contended that the Democrats jacking up the fears was a form of hysteria.
"Trump did not take mask-wearing seriously and continually downplayed."
He was taking the advice of Fauci at the time, who said wearing masks didn't help, and could even hurt.
"As for Biden blaming ALL of the deaths on Trump, I've talked about this separate issue multiple times, speaking in conditional statements to cover every possible angle."
Yes, you've deflected and spun your story.
The fact is he said it. It wasn't a gaffe because he reiterated the same sentiment multiple times. He even said "I'm not making this up." How much clearer does it have to be to sink into your thick skull?
" or that the pandemic "hoax" was triggered by my off hand remark."
Now you're just babbling.
You said "Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax.""
And that was a fucking lie. He didn't call the pandemic a hoax.
At least try to be honest.
"Actually, he contended that the Democrats jacking up the fears was a form of hysteria."
No, you're wrong. He's criticized Democrats, to be sure, but he's also criticized the press, and the medical establishment. Now, if in your teeny-tiny brain you want to say, "Yeah, they're all Democrats," fine, but it's not limited to the Democratic Party.
Re: Downplaying Masks:
"He was taking the advice of Fauci at the time, who said wearing masks didn't help, and could even hurt."
We know about the medical establishment's lie in that case. Subsequently, after Fauci reversed course, Trump still pooh-poohed mask wearing. He wanted the country to open up by Easter.
Pandemic hoax:
"And that was a fucking lie. He didn't call the pandemic a hoax."
No, it's not. Trump downplayed. There were only 15 cases. We would be fine. It wasn't until bodybags coming out of NY, his old friends dying, when he even appeared to take the virus seriously. Shit, shortly after being infected and going to the hospital, he insisted on coming out and waving to the public. His White House had more infections than New Zealand.
"No, you're wrong. He's criticized Democrats, to be sure, but he's also criticized the press, and the medical establishment."
You're like a kid with ADHD. All over the fucking place.
Show me a quote from Trump where he said the 'medical establishment' was creating 'hysteria.'
And yes, the Democrats and the mainstream media are the same. Both of them hate Trump.
"We know about the medical establishment's lie in that case."
No, it was Fauci's lie. Why isn't he being criticized for misleading people early on when it could have made a difference? He was the medical authority, not Trump.
No, the Dems and the media hate Trump, so they're going after him instead.
"after Fauci reversed course, Trump still pooh-poohed mask wearing. He wanted the country to open up by Easter."
Now you're just making shit up again.
From here:
https://nypost.com/2021/06/03/fauci-emails-show-his-flip-flopping-on-wearing-masks-to-fight-covid/
By the end of March, Fauci had become more receptive to the idea of masking up. As he wrote to a Dr. David Katz of La Jolla, Calif. on the last day of that month: "There are some data from NIH that indicate that mere speaking without coughing elicits aerosols that travel a foot or two. If that is the case, then perhaps universal wearing of masks in the most practical way to go."
On April 3, then-President Donald Trump announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was recommending Americans wear cloth or fabric face coverings in public places. States like New York soon announced that residents should wear masks when social distancing was not possible.
"Show me a quote from Trump where he said the 'medical establishment' was creating 'hysteria.'"
I do not have a quote off-hand of Trump criticizing the medical establishment. I do have a quote of Trump saying the press is in "hysteria mode." Your claim is disproven.
"No, it was Fauci's lie. Why isn't he being criticized for misleading people early on when it could have made a difference? He was the medical authority, not Trump.
No, the Dems and the media hate Trump, so they're going after him instead."
Hilarious. One thing disproven, onto the next. Accusing me of ADHD: Again, all of the accusations are confessions. Fauci is part of the medical establishment that assured the public early on not to wear masks. And of course Facui's been criticized. Biden should have let him go. But, here's the thing: Despite Fauci's failures, he's still not as bad as Trump. He's wormy Washington guy who failed to stand up to Trump.
"Yes, he downplayed. While taking steps to mitigate it, like shutting down flights. Which Biden wouldn't have done.
And 'downplaying' isn't the same as calling it a hoax.
Stop lying."
Christ, you're fucking retarded. The only reason why "hoax" is used is because of your boy, Cheeto Von Tweeto.
"I do not have a quote off-hand of Trump criticizing the medical establishment."
See, this is what you liars do. I ask you for a quote from Trump saying the medical establishment was creating hysteria, and you say you can't find a quote criticizing them.
First of all, you were lying saying he said they were creating hysteria, and now you're lying again by switching it to 'criticizing.'
Stop fucking lying.
"I do have a quote of Trump saying the press is in "hysteria mode." Your claim is disproven."
When did I claim that Trump didn't say the press was causing hysteria? Of course they were. As I said, they hated Trump just as much as the Democrats, so of course they were going to cause hysteria in order to undermine him.
Learn to fucking read.
"One thing disproven, onto the next."
Huh? What did you disprove? The only thing you disproven is that you have any functioning brain cells.
"And of course Facui's been criticized."
No, he hasn't. Other than from the Right. The Left has treated him like a god.
Stop fucking lying.
"Despite Fauci's failures, he's still not as bad as Trump."
Says the TDS sufferer. "Orange man bad!"
"And 'downplaying' isn't the same as calling it a hoax."
No, it isn't moron.
"The only reason why "hoax" is used is because of your boy,"
Yes, he used hoax. And then idiots like you who can't fucking understand the meanings of words lied and said the pandemic was a hoax, not the Democrats' reaction to it.
Stop lying.
"See, this is what you liars do. I ask you for a quote from Trump saying the medical establishment was creating hysteria, and you say you can't find a quote criticizing them."
No, I said I did not have a quote off-hand; I did not say I was incapable of finding a quote. See, I'm not into your sort of panic Googling. I'm also inclined to believe any fair-minded observer will recall President Lysol being at loggerheads with Fauci and others. It's not an extraordinary claim. I regard as you a bug. One that has been squashed multiple times.
"First of all, you were lying saying he said they were creating hysteria, and now you're lying again by switching it to 'criticizing."
You have no apparent idea what I'm claiming. Trump said the press was in hysteria mode, which can be fairly interpreted as causing panic (which is why he said he downplayed). Regardless, youv'e been shown to be wrong yet again.
"When did I claim that Trump didn't say the press was causing hysteria?"
You said it was the Democrats, you idiot. And that's when I said it wasn't just Democrats. Jesus.
On Fauci being criticized:
"No, he hasn't. Other than from the Right. The Left has treated him like a god."
Just another dumb take in a string of dumb takes. If the Right has criticized him, then he's been criticized. It's also silly to imagine the left is monolithic. Yes, certainly most Democrats lionize him.
[deleted]
Re: Biden calling Trump a xenophobe for banning flights from China.
First, what does this have to do with anything? You have a basket of grudges you've been nursing? Second, there's this: https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_8df18b2a-26ab-4d33-ba13-2c4a4e45b23c Third, I don't really care one way or the other. I didn't vote for Joe Biden and I don't support Joe Biden. The best thing he has going for him is that he's not Trump.
>Despite the fact that there are so many variables, Biden said, "So folks, I will take care of this. I will end this." He was spreading bullshit. So why should we give him a break for unexpected occurrences when your side never gave Trump that courtesy?
Again, you're dropping context on those remarks. Also, when it comes to politicians, we do grade on a curve. Of course politicians generally claim they will fix problems -- otherwise people wouldn't vote for them. It's gobsmackingly stupid for you to compare Biden with Trump (or Trump with anyone). Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax. He said he would build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it. Or that he would provide better health-care for more people at a fraction of the cost (and it will be so easy). In his wild inauguration, Trump said, "I alone can fix it." Afterward, one prominent attendee described the performance as "some weird shit." That person of course was woke leftist commie atheist George W. Bush.
I'm sorry that you're not an observant person.
You're not an especially bright person.
You are tenacious.
You should try shutting the fuck up, and reading more. These tips are free.
"First, what does this have to do with anything?"
It has everything to do with it. Biden criticized Trump's handling of Covid, but Biden never would've shut down the flights, which would've made it worse.
"Second, there's this: "
Yeah, Biden mentioned xenophobia the day after Trump shut down the flights, and CNN claims it had nothing to do with Trump's action. Only libtards like you believe that.
"The best thing he has going for him is that he's not Trump."
You're one of the morons who hate Trump so much, you want a senile pants shitter running our country.
"Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax."
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/campaign-press-release-fact-check-president-trump-did-not-call-the-coronavirus-hoax
This false claim has been debunked by 8 fact checkers.
Joe Biden continues to repeat a lie debunked by at least 8 fact checkers. The president never called the coronavirus a hoax.
The Washington Post gave Biden's claim 4 Pinocchios for manipulating video to falsely make it appear that President Trump called the coronavirus a "hoax."
AP News: "Biden distorts Trump's words on virus 'hoax'"
CNN: "Biden ad misleadingly suggests Trump called Covid-19 a 'hoax'"
Politifact: "Biden's video is inaccurate. We rate it False."
FactCheck.org: "Trump said that when he used the word "hoax," he was referring to Democrats finding fault with his administration's response to coronavirus, not the virus itself."
Check Your Fact: "Trump referred to the alleged 'politicizing' of the coronavirus by Democrats as 'their new hoax.' He did not refer to the coronavirus itself as a hoax."
Lead Stories: "Trump Did NOT Call Coronavirus A 'Hoax' Or 'Political Conspiracy"
Snopes: "Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax."
Re: Trump shutting down flights
>It has everything to do with it. Biden criticized Trump's handling of Covid, but Biden never would've shut down the flights, which would've made it worse.
Just about everyone agrees that occurred way too late to have an effect. This is a highly contagious pathogen. Banning flights from countries became tribalized as a result of Trump's poisonous insistence on a "Muslim ban." He, along with right-lunatics like yourself, have degraded our politics.
Just to return to the OP asked about conservatives, and I said there weren't many. I bet you've never read Oakeshott, Chesterton, Burke, or Scruton. In 2016, Trump was considered the LEAST conservative candidate.
"Just about everyone agrees that occurred way too late to have an effect. "
Proof positive you're suffering from TDS.
From here: https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html
January 31, 2020
The World Health Organization International Health Regulation Emergency Committee reconvenes and declares the coronavirus outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
January 31, 2020
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, declares the SARS-CoV-2 virus a public health emergency and the White House 2019 Novel Coronavirus Task Force announces the implementation of new travel policies to be effective at 5:00 PM EST on February 2, 2020.
So the travel ban was announced on the SAME DAY the WHO declared the outbreak a public health emergency of international concern.
But you morons say that wasn't fast enough. If he had done it sooner, you morons would've criticized him for overreacting. Just like Joe called him a xenophobe.
No matter what Trump did, according to you idiots, it wasn't right.
"Trump's poisonous insistence on a "Muslim ban.""
You fucking idiot. It wasn't a Muslim ban. It was a ban of certain countries, and they used a list that Obama had created.
You're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
"Trump was considered the LEAST conservative candidate."
It's obvious you don't understand why conservatives voted for Trump. Just remain in the dark and keep foaming at the mouth about him.
>So the travel ban was announced on the SAME DAY the WHO declared the outbreak a public health emergency of international concern.
Amusing. Just as you're ready to uncritically accept fact-checkers because they support your priors, you're emotionally invested in what WHO said at the time. It was too little, too late. Anyone with two brain cells can solve this one: Trump bravely stopped people from flying in from China... yet the virus still ravaged the US. And in reality there was nothing that could have stopped it from reaching our shores.
As for TDS, until January 6th, I did not consider Trump the worst Republican President in the past two decades. The invasion of Iraq was a war of choice; though Trump's a dumb boob who bungled the response to COVID, the disease's existence was not his fault.
>You fucking idiot. It wasn't a Muslim ban. It was a ban of certain countries, and they used a list that Obama had created.
More dumb apologetics. In the campaign, when Trump was trying to get votes from stupid bigots, he called for Muslim ban. When he surprisingly won office, those words came back to haunt him after lawyers authored his EOs.
"you're emotionally invested in what WHO said at the time."
But you just said this:
"Just about everyone agrees that occurred way too late to have an effect. "
Huh? What the fuck are you babbling about?
"And in reality there was nothing that could have stopped it from reaching our shores."
Joe Biden said he would've stopped it. He said everyone who died from covid was Trump's fault.
"If the president had done his job, had done his job from the beginning, all the people would still be alive. All the people. I'm not making this up. Just look at the data." -- Joe Biden
"until January 6th"
Yeah, Democrat rioters were burning down the country and killing people during the summer of 2020, encouraged by Democrat lies, including Biden. But on Jan 6th a few people broke into the Capitol and caused some damage, but didn't burn anything or kill anyone, and the media called it an 'insurrection' and you finally got upset.
Pathetic.
"In the campaign, when Trump was trying to get votes from stupid bigots, he called for Muslim ban."
So wait, when Biden says, "I'll fix this" during his campaign, but doesn't do it, you're okay with him not doing what he said he would. But when Trump talks about banning Muslims during the campaign, but doesn't do it, you're blaming him for doing something he didn't do, but only said he would do?
You're brain is fucked up.
>Joe Biden said he would've stopped it. He said everyone who died from covid was Trump's fault.
Uh-huh. Are you just tired of making up things about me?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=%22If+the+president+had+done+his+job%2C+had+done+his+job+from+the+beginning%2C+all+the+people+would+still+be+alive.+All+the+people.+I%27m+not+making+this+up.+Just+look+at+the+data.%22+
>Yeah, Democrat rioters were burning down the country and killing people during the summer of 2020, encouraged by Democrat lies, including Biden. But on Jan 6th a few people broke into the Capitol and caused some damage, but didn't burn anything or kill anyone, and the media called it an 'insurrection' and you finally got upset.
Another weak talking point.
"You're brain is fucked up."
Well said.
"Uh-huh. Are you just tired of making up things about me?"
Huh? I gave you the quote from Biden. He blamed EVERY covid death on Trump.
Here's the link from a leftwing website fact-checking him on it:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/18/joe-biden/joe-biden-wrongly-claims-trump-couldve-prevented-e/
Wait, I see what you did there. You took the quote I posted and then you found someone fact-checking a different quote - where someone claimed that Joe Biden said that if he were president, no one would've died.
That isn't what I said he said. Stop your fucking lying.
"Another weak talking point."
If it was a weak talking point, you'd have a much better reply than "Another weak talking point."
You got nothing.
"Wait, I see what you did there. You took the quote I posted and then you found someone fact-checking a different quote - where someone claimed that Joe Biden said that if he were president, no one would've died."
Man, you're dumb. I took the quote you posted and put it into Google. OF COURSE it's a right-wing trope. You have a list for copy pastah.
"OF COURSE it's a right-wing trope."
What the fuck are you babbling about?
I gave you a DIRECT quote from Biden, and also a link to a leftwing fact-checker that said Biden was mistaken.
How the fuck is that a right-wing trope?
Good god, are you stupid.
Jesus Christ. If something is addressed by a fact-checker, then that's a pretty good indicator that it's been circulation and actually is something of a trope.
Man, you have some serious little brother syndrome. Joe Biden said this. Joe Biden said that. You have these meanderings because whenever compelled to get into an argument, you lose.
I took your quote and I put it into Google. A bunch of hits say that it (predictably) drops context and is phony. On cue, you cherry-pick one site that apparently says Joe Biden believes that if Joe Biden were president nobody would have died from coronavirus.
If Joe Biden actually believes that, he's an idiot. That said, it's unlikely that Joe Biden does actually believe that. That you believe Joe Biden believes it means you're probably an idiot. You've demonstrated -- repeatedly -- a willingness to act in bad faith.
"If something is addressed by a fact-checker, then that's a pretty good indicator that it's been circulation and actually is something of a trope."
What the fuck are you babbling about? Because something is fact-checked, it's a trope?
Fact-checkers fact check things all the time. Every time there's a debate, it's fact-checked. That doesn't mean everything they fact-check is a trope.
trope
/trōp/
a figurative or metaphorical use of a word or expression.
Yeah, you're a psycho.
"I took your quote and I put it into Google."
And? One of the results is the one I posted before you did your google search. What was the purpose of your search?
Biden said the quote I posted. He claimed Trump was responsible for EVERYONE who died of Covid.
"If Joe Biden actually believes that, he's an idiot. That said, it's unlikely that Joe Biden does actually believe that. That you believe Joe Biden believes it means you're probably an idiot."
Huh? I never said Joe Biden believes that if he was president, no one would have died.
Would you please learn to fucking read?
>Because something is fact-checked, it's a trope?
You don't understand causality.
>Huh? I never said Joe Biden believes that if he was president, no one would have died.
Christ, you're stupid. The headline on your site reads, "Joe Biden wrongly claims Trump could’ve prevented every COVID-19 death" So you believe Biden believes Trump could have prevented all of these deaths, but if Biden were president, he would NOT have prevented them?
>Would you please learn to fucking read?
Again, all of the accusations are confessions.
"You don't understand causality."
Sure I do.
cau·sal·i·ty
1. the relationship between cause and effect.
2. the principle that everything has a cause.
So, tell me how fact-checking CAUSES something to be a trope.
"Christ, you're stupid. The headline on your site reads, "Joe Biden wrongly claims Trump could’ve prevented every COVID-19 death" So you believe Biden believes Trump could have prevented all of these deaths, but if Biden were president, he would NOT have prevented them?"
That's certainly an inference to be made, but I didn't make it.
Do you know how to read? Are you aware that a few of the results in your google search proved that Biden didn't say that no one would've died if he were president?
And they're right. He didn't say that. He said that everyone died because of Trump. That's two different statements. Someone can argue that one logically leads to the other, but Biden didn't say both. And I didn't say he said both.
You're obviously confused by this simple topic.
So, once again, please learn to fucking read.
"Sure I do [understand causality]
[runs to the dictionary]
So, tell me how fact-checking CAUSES something to be a trope."
You just demonstrated (again) that you have no clue. I said that a term being addressed by fact-checkers is an "indicator" that it's a trope. What enshrines it as a trope IS the wide-spread circulation. Yet another face-plant in a series of a face-plants.
I wrote: "So you believe Biden believes Trump could have prevented all of these deaths, but if Biden were president, he would NOT have prevented them?"
"That's certainly an inference to be made, but I didn't make it."
You don't understand how English works. Readers infer, writers imply.
If Biden says Trump could have prevented the deaths, but didn't, a reasonable person could justifiably infer that Biden believes that, were he president, he would have acted to prevent the deaths. But that did not register in your teeny-tiny brain?
And again, this drifts afield from what's at stake, but, strangely, it's a line you wish to pursue while also claiming I'm the one who is "confused." You are impossibly stupid.
"What enshrines it as a trope IS the wide-spread circulation. "
So you're 'wide spread circulation' is one liberal mentioning it in a blog?
Hahahahahaha!
You're an idiot.
"You don't understand how English works. Readers infer, writers imply."
Huh? Are you really this fucking stupid? Of course I meant infer.
Joe Biden said "Trump was responsible for all deaths."
Anyone reading that could INFER he meant, "No one would have died if I were president."
So you read:
"That's certainly an inference to be made, but I didn't make it."
And you thought I was stating that Biden was 'implying' something?
Good god, you're so fucking stupid. I'm arguing with an idiot here.
Learn the fucking meaning of words, moron.
"So you're 'wide spread circulation' is one liberal mentioning it in a blog?"
Is this an act? Some kind of avant-garde performance piecet? All of the mis-spelling and the stupidity -- it's a satirical take-down of the alt-right, yes? I posted the Google search of the quote. It identifies a bunch of uses, including the "liberal" fact-checker. The quote even cropped up in a thread that you authored (I use that word like your mother -- loosely).
"Anyone reading that could INFER he meant, "No one would have died if I were president."
So you read:
'That's certainly an inference to be made, but I didn't make it.'
And you thought I was stating that Biden was 'implying' something?"
You don't have any idea how foolish you look.
"I posted the Google search of the quote."
So, what was your purpose of googling the quote?
Biden said it. I said he said it. It was a lie.
Period.
"You don't have any idea how foolish you look."
Here is the part of the debate where you don't want to admit you're wrong, so you just say something stupid.
I used the word 'infer' correctly. And I explained how I used it correctly.
And you can't reply to that.
But you can't admit it.
Psycho.
"So, what was your purpose of googling the quote?"
Dur, to see what you were on about? As I've said previously, these sort of right-wing copy/pastahs crop up all of the time: "Obama believes US has 57 states."
"Here is the part of the debate where you don't want to admit you're wrong, so you just say something stupid."
No, I'm happy to let your "Who's on First" routine speak for itself, though I am growing tired of playing Abbott to your Costello.
"Dur, to see what you were on about? As I've said previously, these sort of right-wing copy/pastahs crop up all of the time: "Obama believes US has 57 states.""
Sorry to burst your dumbass bubble, but that quote wasn't something the right-wing made up.
It was an actual quote, you fucking braindead idiot.
"No, I'm happy to let your "Who's on First" routine speak for itself"
What, you don't want to talk about 'infer' anymore?
Because you're too stupid to comprehend the context in which I used it.
"Sorry to burst your dumbass bubble, but that quote wasn't something the right-wing made up."
Jesus, did I say it was made-up? Read for comprehension. I said the context is important. Obama never sincerely believed the US had 57 states. He had been campaigning for more than 24 hours and had traveled to 47 states, but wanted to go to all 50, so he was tongue-tied. What's your excuse?
"What, you don't want to talk about 'infer' anymore?
Because you're too stupid to comprehend the context in which I used it."
You're unaware of your own stupidity. Re-read what you said about inferences after you sober up.
"Obama never sincerely believed the US had 57 states. He had been campaigning for more than 24 hours and had traveled to 47 states"
So you're actually comparing what Obama said about 57 states - which was basically a typo - to what Biden said about Trump being to blame for ALL Covid deaths?
Seriously?
Read it again:
"If the president had done his job, had done his job from the beginning, all the people would still be alive. All the people. I'm not making this up. Just look at the data."
That's not a 'typo'. He meant to say that. And then he added, "I'm not making this up. Just look at the data."
It was said during a town hall, where candidates are given talking points to say. It's obvious he meant to say it.
And then he doubled down on it later by saying "Anyone who is responsible for that many deaths, should not remain as president of the US"
No, it wasn't flub. Stop being dishonest.
"Re-read what you said about inferences after you sober up."
Here is what you said:
"So you believe Biden believes Trump could have prevented all of these deaths, but if Biden were president, he would NOT have prevented them?"
And I replied:
"That's certainly an inference to be made, but I didn't make it."
Why are you having a problem understanding that? It's plain English.
I was saying that someone could infer that (meaning interpret Biden's statement to mean that) but I hadn't interpreted it that way.
It plain fucking English. Do you need help with the multisyllable words?
"So you're actually comparing what Obama said about 57 states - which was basically a typo - to what Biden said about Trump being to blame for ALL Covid deaths?"
Please, try not to be retarded. I said that I not taking these talking points at face-value, and gave the example of the Obama spiel.
They need to be investigated for context.
"It was said during a town hall, where candidates are given talking points to say. It's obvious he meant to say it."
Hilarious. This whole time you've contended Joe Biden suffers from dementia and can't speak for one minute without fucking up, but he meant exactly what he said here. Never mind that it was a townhall.
This is why it's important to follow up to make sure a person meant exactly what was said, which is the case with Trump talking about the virus hoax. He did not actually intend to say that Coronavirus was made-up by political opponents.
You don't know how to operate in good faith.
I don't know who you think you're fooling by offering to write in monosyllabic words.
"This whole time you've contended Joe Biden suffers from dementia and can't speak for one minute without fucking up, but he meant exactly what he said here."
As I said, he repeated the same sentiment later.
Don't be stupid.
"He did not actually intend to say that Coronavirus was made-up by political opponents."
Not only did he not intend that, he didn't say that.
Only you idiots who suffer from TDS claim he said that.
"Not only did he not intend that, he didn't say that.
Only you idiots who suffer from TDS claim he said that."
This is more bullshit. Trump's description raised eyebrows, and people followed up, and he later explained, "No, no, no."
"This is more bullshit. Trump's description raised eyebrows, and people followed up,"
Yeah, the typical Democrats who blamed him for everything 'raised their eyebrows' and 'followed up.'
Their intentional misunderstanding of what Trump said doesn't mean he said what they claimed he said.
The press asked him. Trump abuses and misuses the word "hoax." The climate change hoax. The impeachment hoax.
share"The press asked him."
No, they went with "Trump calls Covid a hoax." They went with that even after he explained he didn't mean that.
Because they're lying pieces of shit, just like you for saying the same thing they did.
"Trump abuses and misuses the word "hoax." The climate change hoax. The impeachment hoax."
Your TDS opinion is noted. I think he used the word appropriately.
If climate change isn't a hoax, why does the Paris Accords allow Chine to build HUNDREDS of large scale coal plants in the next few years, with only the PROMISE of cutting back on emissions by 2030. (And everyone with a brain knows they're going to break that promise) All the while we're hurting our economy by punishing fossil fuel, and not making a dent in emissions relative to China's increasing output.
And the impeachment was obviously a hoax, impeaching Trump over a phone call where he was exercising his Executive Power. The ONLY reason they impeached Trump was because they had the votes.
So yeah, Trump knows exactly what 'hoax' means.
"No, they went with 'Trump calls Covid a hoax.' They went with that even after he explained he didn't mean that.
Because they're lying pieces of shit, just like you for saying the same thing they did."
Again, you're not being truthful. The press consists of many, many different people and organizations. Members asked him for clarification.
"Your TDS opinion is noted. I think he used the word [hoax] appropriately."
Then that's a form of derangement.
"If climate change isn't a hoax, why does the Paris Accords allow Chine to build HUNDREDS of large scale coal plants in the next few years, with only the PROMISE of cutting back on emissions by 2030. (And everyone with a brain knows they're going to break that promise) All the while we're hurting our economy by punishing fossil fuel, and not making a dent in emissions relative to China's increasing output."
See, you can't stick to the argument at hand so you branch further and further out, often resorting to semantic wanking (which you are terrible at debating). Climate was just another example of Trump frequently and loosely invoking the word "hoax." I have no intention of getting sucked into yet another side-discussion about something where you're painfully ignorant. Painfully.
"And the impeachment was obviously a hoax, impeaching Trump over a phone call where he was exercising his Executive Power. The ONLY reason they impeached Trump was because they had the votes."
Christ, you're just showing that you don't know what hoax means. The irony is that when I reference the COVID hoax you will not accord the same standard to my words as Trump's. It's just dishonesty and bad faith with you.
Trump used taxpayer money to subvert a national election. In the US, you can secretly drop bombs on the heads of Cambodians (or other foreigners), but you're not allowed to use the powers of the government to conspire against rival domestic elites.
"The press consists of many, many different people and organizations. Members asked him for clarification."
And even after he clarified, they claimed he said the pandemic was a hoax. Just like you're claiming it now.
Are you this fucking stupid?
"Then that's a form of derangement."
So someone is deranged because they disagree with you?
Idiot.
"I have no intention of getting sucked into yet another side-discussion about something where you're painfully ignorant."
Translation: "I can't defend the Paris Accord allowing China to increase their carbon output by a staggering amount while we're harming our economy by cutting back our carbon output. Even though I brought up the subject of Climate Change being a hoax."
And by the way, our entire debate here is a 'side discussion', with you taking a post about Joe Biden and turning it into a whine-fest about Trump.
"you don't know what hoax means."
hoax
/hoks/
noun
a humorous or malicious deception.
The Democrats used a malicious deception to impeach Trump over a legitimate phone call.
Yes, you're a fucking moron.
"to use the powers of the government to conspire against rival domestic elites."
But you can use the power of the government to investigate if a crime has been committed.
Moron.
Okay, this conversation is over. It's obvious you hate Trump so much, no amount of facts are going to convince you otherwise. You keep shifting around, abandoning a topic when I prove you wrong and going onto something else. (You sure did shut up about 'fully approved' after I showed you the Maderna website. LOL!)
The bottom line is, you can't defend Biden, who is the subject of this post, so you deflect to your Trump Derangement Syndrome, where your hatred of him won't allow any facts to get through your thick skull. You hate him so much, you don't even believe liberal fact-checkers when they go against your obvious delusions.
And while I could have more fun proving your stupidity, I have better ways to spend my time.
Have fun enjoying the total shit show that is the Biden administration. Yeah, I know, it's "better than Trump! *drool*"
"And even after he clarified, they claimed he said the pandemic was a hoax. Just like you're claiming it now."
This is a reason why you will always be stupid. I explained precisely what I meant, but you refuse to learn.
"So someone is deranged because they disagree with you?"
No, someone is not deranged because they disagree me. Again, that's what a stupid person would infer. I disagree with lots of people, and do not think the vast majority of them are deranged.
Re: Not interested in discussing climate change here with you.
"Translation: 'I can't defend the Paris Accord...'"
You have this undeserved opinion of your views. I think if any fair-minded person were to read through this exchange they would regard your understanding of politics and ability to debate as inferior to mine. An intelligent person on your side of the spectrum would be especially upset to have such a dumb representative.
You can't stay on a topic so you sprawl. You think typing a craptastic response means you've demonstrated something other than your painful ignorance.
"(You sure did shut up about 'fully approved' after I showed you the Maderna website. LOL!)"
You're not terribly observant.
"And while I could have more fun proving your stupidity, I have better ways to spend my time."
Uh-huh. I'm happy I did not have to prove your stupidity. I just allowed it to speak for itself.
So, let's recap this conversation:
You claimed that Hillary being on the 'verge of death' was a major campaign issue, but your only backup for that was a blog post where a liberal was making fun of the concept.
You claimed I was 'cherry picking' Biden's fuck-ups, but when I posted a whole slew of them, you're reply was "he's always done that."
You fail to admit the obvious deterioration of Biden's mind that's evident every time he speaks.
You tried to blame Trump's timetable for withdrawal for Biden's complete fuck-up of going against his generals' advice.
When I stated that the vaccine hadn't been approved for most of 2021, you tried to claim it was 'approved but not fully approved', when the FDA themselves clearly state it was 'approved' in August. This was especially stupid since I was claiming people weren't taking the vaccine because it wasn't approved. So they should have taken it because you want to argue over semantics?
Then you repeated the often disproven lies about Trump not shutting down the flights fast enough, or that he called the virus a hoax. Here's a hint: That only works when you're talking with your fellow liberals in one of your echo chambers and there's no one around to point out the truth.
And finally, you took a thread asking if Biden is a pedophile with dementia and turned it into you pissing and moaning about Trump. Yeah, you really have TDS bad. LOL!
Much of your chronology is wrong. I could have posted a bunch of unread links of people claiming Clinton was on the verge of death. Instead I posted an article where a reporter did that leg work.
I said from the outset Biden was in cognitive decline. You posted a two minute video from 30 years ago where he read prepared remarks and said he fucks up every minute.
I didn't blame Trump for Biden's complete fuck-up. I said that he bragged about tying Biden's hands. Biden made the decision to withdraw and said it would go off without a hitch. It didn't. It was the last fuck-up in a forever war loaded with fuck-ups. If it had gone off without a hitch, Trump would have taken credit (like a rooster takes credit for a sunrise).
The vaccine stuff has been discussed more recently. You face-planted repeatedly and you can try all you want to save it now, but, like Afghanistan, it's a lost cause.
I explained why "pandemic hoax" and you have no response but to retreat into liberal echo chambers.
The knowledge gaps that you have are bad enough, but it's compounded by an ability to reason thoughtfully or argue effectively. Part of you must surely be aware of this...
"Instead I posted an article where a reporter did that leg work."
You obviously didn't read the article. It was written by a liberal who was ridiculing those who were pointing out Hillary's health problems. His basic premise was, "How can Hillary be president when she's going to be dead, according to rightwing nuts."
"You posted a two minute video from 30 years ago where he read prepared remarks"
And I also posted current videos of him reading prepared remarks. He can't even read off a fucking cue card.
"I didn't blame Trump for Biden's complete fuck-up."
I blamed Biden for the Afghanistan fuck-up, and you deflected blame away from him by mentioning Trump.
It's what you TDS suffers do. All the time.
"You face-planted repeatedly and you can try all you want to save it now"
Yeah, right. Keep telling yourself that, moron. You're the one who's trying to pass off 'approved for emergency use' as 'approved'.
Because you choose dishonesty over admitting you're wrong.
"I explained why "pandemic hoax""
Once again, you gave your opinion. Like all dumbass liberals, you expect others to accept your opinions as fact.
By the way, did you notice that many of those fact-checkers were from the left? Even your fellow idiots think you don't have a legitimate argument here.
"but it's compounded by an ability to reason thoughtfully or argue effectively. Part of you must surely be aware of this..."
You're like a child who is proven wrong again and again, but stubbornly keeps insisting you're right.
That pretty much defines liberals these days.
>You obviously didn't read the article. It was written by a liberal who was ridiculing those who were pointing out Hillary's health problems. His basic premise was, "How can Hillary be president when she's going to be dead, according to rightwing nuts."
Jesus Christ, the article was written by a woman. It was about all of Clinton's imminent maladies, which laid the groundwork for Biden's maladies.
"I blamed Biden for the Afghanistan fuck-up, and you deflected blame away from him by mentioning Trump."
By mentioning how Trump bragged he forced the timetable? Yeah. Each President has passed that mess onto the next. Except for Biden. He stuck to the plan for withdrawal, which the public supported. Importantly, Trump didn't just support the move, he claimed credit for it. If it had gone perfectly, Trump (and his dumb minions (e.g. you)) would have given himself all of the credit. Trump greenlighted a risky operation early into his presidency, it went tits up and he promptly blamed the generals.
I'm sorry that your guy is shit. While other heads of state around the world took the vaccine jab on television, Trump received his secretly. That's poor leadership.
>Once again, you gave your opinion. Like all dumbass liberals, you expect others to accept your opinions as fact.
I've invited you multiple times to point out the errors in reasoning. Pack journalism should be an explanation you're receptive to but, ironically, you're a slave of confirmation bias.
I'm sorry that you're unpleasantly stupid and ill-informed. Get better.
"It was about all of Clinton's imminent maladies,"
Yes, and then using snark to say those maladies meant she was going to be dead.
So you LIED when you said republicans believed Hillary was on the verge of death and it was a major campaign issue.
Stop lying.
"Except for Biden. He stuck to the plan for withdrawal"
No, he fucked up the plan for withdrawal. Got soldiers killed and Americans trapped there.
And you only bring up Trump to deflect from that fact.
"If it had gone perfectly, Trump (and his dumb minions (e.g. you)) would have given himself all of the credit. "
Another libtard gazing into their TDS demented crystal ball and expecting everyone to take them seriously.
"I'm sorry that your guy is shit. While other heads of state around the world took the vaccine jab on television, Trump received his secretly."
Oh no! You've uncovered a conspiracy akin to 9/11 and the fake moon landing!
You're a joke.
"I've invited you multiple times to point out the errors in reasoning."
And I've told you multiple times to read the fact-checking.
Are you capable of doing that?
” Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax.”
I haven’t got a dog in this fight, but I’m posting for the 10th time it seems…Trump did NOT call the virus a hoax. The following is from Snopes so stop saying he did.
”What's False
”Despite creating some confusion with his remarks, Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax.”
I pointed that out to this moron, but he keeps insisting on saying he has his own reason why Trump said it was a hoax.
But it's just more TDS babble.
He writes “Right wingers are saying the impeachment was a hoax. It wasn’t a hoax it happened.” What kind of nonsensical remark is that? We know the impeachment happened. What we are saying is the impeachment was a sham based on the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. The trial was based on a hoax manufactured by slithering snake Schiff and Eric who went bang bang with Fang Fang a Chinese spy!
This poster has a knack for taking things out of context. He quoted Snopes saying it as a mixture regarding Trump’s statement about a hoax. He deliberately omitted the final analysis of Snopes report which is what I posted.
I referenced Snopes from memory. My remarks are explicit that Trump never called the coronavirus itself a hoax.
It seems you have a habit of failing to read for comprehension.
Did you not write the following or was it your sock:
” It's gobsmackingly stupid for you to compare Biden with Trump (or Trump with anyone).” ”Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax.”
Because this website sucks, it's difficult to find exact time-stamps, but you should have noticed there are parallel threads. Here's the first use of the word "hoax" from a browser search:
"Re: Right-wingers claiming the virus was a hoax to destroy the Trump economy, then changing narratives to say the left wants permanent govt. control of the economy..."
Now, do you honestly think I meant that right-wingers did not believe the virus was real? I can speak with some authority regarding the intention of my words as I am... the author.
From a top-down search, the next instance appears here:
"Inasmuch as you have not seen right-wingers make these sort of claims, the argument will not have much purchase. Ostrich-like behavior is really useful here. Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a 'hoax.' Or the cries about a lockdown."
The intention here should be reasonably clear in retrospect, as the next post debunked this alleged "lie." Also notice the *pandemic* is described as a hoax, consistent with the idea that Trump downplayed the disease's spread.
You're quoting from a parallel thread, and the remarks there were part of a laundry list of Trump's outlandish claims (e.g., building a wall that Mexico will pay for). IOTW, short-hand. Though a one-sided affair, there were only two participants for the bulk of this discussion, and what's said in one thread carried over to the other.
If you want an example of dishonesty, I'll give you one: "He quoted Snopes saying it as a mixture regarding Trump’s statement about a hoax. He deliberately omitted the final analysis of Snopes report which is what I posted."
This suggests that I quoted paragraphs from the Snopes site, which I have not visited in years. My "quote" was recalling that they labeled the "lie" as "mixed," though maybe they used the word "mixture." I did not deliberately omit anything; I was recalling its conclusion.
Now there are two Costellos.
Without going into a verbose reply, did you or did you or did you not write the following:
”Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax”
It's amusing watching you try to play prosecutor.
Yes, I wrote that. Several times in different variations. That rendering probably was not the first.
I have a question for you: If there was any confusion about what that meant, did I explain it?
I’m pleased you find me amusing, but I’m not trying to “play prosecutor.
No, you did not explain it. Again from you:
”Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax.”
I don’t understand you. You reply with long drawn out winded replies without admitting you’ve wrote such numerous times. Again…did you state or have you stated Trump called the virus a hoax? Also your replies would be more reader friendly if you used the quote format instead of quotation marks.
Edit: If you continue writing Trump called the virus a “hoax” then you are just as guilty as the other prevaricators who say it. (Prevaricator…more genteel than calling you a liar. Don’t you agree?)
"No, you did not explain it."
Oh, I certainly did. I'll quote from a post added four days ago:
Re: Coronavirus hoax
I remember the fact-checkers on this one. Here are Trump's remarks:
"One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. We’re 15 people [cases of coronavirus infection] in this massive country. And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that."
Let's take for example the "impeachment hoax." It wasn't a hoax; it actually happened. Democrats didn't merely threaten to impeach him -- they DID impeach him. 2X. Trump would have to acknowledge that, yes, he was impeached. What he's saying is that the impeachment was based on non-credible grounds. Now that we have our stupid-to-English translators out, it's perfectly reasonable to infer that Trump here means that the Coronavirus is all blown out of proportion -- just like the "perfect" phone call was blown all out of proportion. He later says the press is in "hysteria mode," but Coronavirus is nothing to worry about because he has it under control and is doing such a good job.
----
I am happy to have cleared this up for you.
Trump had a terrible way of getting thoughts out. He was one big question mark. I repeat: He did NOT call the virus itself a hoax. He had been fighting the Russia hoax, which it was. The hoax was about the Dems bringing an impeachment against him. Don’t you understand that? So when the virus hit his thought process was “Yet something else they’re coming after me just like the Russia hoax.” He said “This is their new hoax.” which meant they were blaming him. As liberal as Snopes is I use them. Some of his statements were deemed a mixture. Snopes could have said what you are saying. Snopes could have left it questionable, but it didn’t. Snopes deemed it “FALSE”. I don’t argue about Trump’s cringe worthy statements as a whole, but this one I will negate. He had foot in mouth syndrome. I turned the channel when he was speaking. I got tired of screaming at him. He never left the board room and acquiesced to the Oval Office. Would I vote for him again? To use someone else’s words who is on the Dems hit list…”You betcha!”
share"I repeat: He did NOT call the virus itself a hoax."
"Repeating" just adds to the confusion: I'm not contending he said the virus itself was a hoax. I made myself perfectly clear about how I interpreted his comments.
Merely saying Snopes concluded otherwise is not much of an argument. You'd have to take on the burden of explaining how their interpretation is fairer or better than mine. But it sounds like you're conflating different things.
If Snopes judges the claim that Trump believes the virus does not exist as "false," or even "FALSE," then I obviously agree. That IS false, as Trump believes the virus physically exists. If they're saying he's NOT downplaying the virus or the prospect of a pandemic, then I obviously disagree.
I won’t argue your last point. But, you have to recall Lord Fauci said at the time we shouldn’t have to be to concerned. I wish Trump had let Lord Fauci do all of the speaking about the virus then you would finally realize from where Trump got his talking points. Lord Fauci was on again, off again in his advisories. You could blame him. 🤷🏼♀️
shareFauci's bottom-line takeaways early on were that the disease is not a threat and would not reach the US, but he also spoke in conditional statements and included caveats that did not make for good sound-bites.
Trump continued to have political rallies late in the 2020 campaign season, prioritizing his political fortunes and egomania at the expense of public health. Fauci warned against large gatherings and urged mask-wearing and distancing.
I'm not contending he said the virus itself was a hoax.
Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax."
"You're such a fucking liar.
This is why I'm done with you. You wouldn't know honesty if it bit you in the ass."
All of the accusations are confessions.
After being "done" with me, here you are again (so much for honesty) demonstrating your inability to read for comprehension.
With a play on Jeopardy:
For a ⭐️ these statements are attributed to:
”Trump is the guy who said COVID was a hoax”
” I'm not contending he said the virus itself was a hoax.”
” Maybe you don't recall President Trump calling the pandemic a "hoax."
And the answer is in the form of a question?
Edit: BTW, the 2nd statement is a contradiction to the 1st and 3rd statements
Sand-poundingly dumb. This has been explained more than once. I thought I had cleared this up for you. You're going to try to memory-hole previous posts. I'm just going to quote myself:
Re: Coronavirus hoax
I remember the fact-checkers on this one. Here are Trump's remarks:
"One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. We’re 15 people [cases of coronavirus infection] in this massive country. And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that."
Let's take for example the "impeachment hoax." It wasn't a hoax; it actually happened. Democrats didn't merely threaten to impeach him -- they DID impeach him. 2X. Trump would have to acknowledge that, yes, he was impeached. What he's saying is that the impeachment was based on non-credible grounds. Now that we have our stupid-to-English translators out, it's perfectly reasonable to infer that Trump here means that the Coronavirus is all blown out of proportion -- just like the "perfect" phone call was blown all out of proportion. He later says the press is in "hysteria mode," but Coronavirus is nothing to worry about because he has it under control and is doing such a good job.
----
I am happy to have cleared this up for you. Again.
You're just too fucking stupid to know how stupid you are.
Fucking liar.
I have other screen shots where you wrote “Trump called the virus a hoax.” You write this garbage then deny what you wrote!
shareWhere are you? I jumped into this testosterone fight between you and the officious MavKilledGoose. Now I’m alone with his verbiage and $50 words.🙇🏼♀️
shareWhen you're having a discussing with someone who just refuses delivery of facts, and is suffering from full-blown TDS, at a certain point you just feel like you're wasting your time.
I could tell him the sky is blue, along with the supporting facts, and his only reply would be, "Trump said the sky was a hoax!"
Everyone reading this thread can see his stupidity. I have better things to do.
You’re correct. I give up! I doubt I will reply to him again. I always deem these set-tos are akin to arguing with a wall. It most definitely is one of the longest threads I’ve read. Also confusing due to his quoting format by just using quotation marks.
shareYoung Joe Biden giving a speech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZlzhULrJC0
Current Joe Biden thinking he's flying a jetpack:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEW1UWdUbww
You have to be completely out of your fucking mind if you think Joe isn't senile.
Biden, who is not good, is better than Trump.
A gratuitous and meaningless comment backed up by nothing at all. That does seem to be the norm around here...
shareWrong. It was backed up by your ridiculous, credibility stripping statement. You are not worth listening to if you actually believe that.
shareYou don't know what "backed up" means. You're talking about a heuristic, not an argument. And here you are listening to me. It's just retards all the way down.
shareIt's been recorded on video and in his daughter's diary. What more evidence do you want? You even read up on symptoms of dementia, and he has all of them.
sharePresidents are required to take regular exams and the results, if not the specifics, are considered matter of public record. Don't you think that would show up?
When Trump was in office there were stories that he was showing symptoms of dementia. I don't believe those any more than I believe the ones about Biden.
The dude literally shit his pants on national tv with Anderson Scooper. Not sure what else you want. He can’t even speak.
Watch a Biden speech form 5, 10
Years ago. Not hard to see a drastic change in the last 2 years.
Dementia.
"Presidents are required to take regular exams and the results, if not the specifics, are considered matter of public record."
Now you're just making shit up.