MovieChat Forums > curiousMInd101 > Replies
curiousMInd101's Replies
That's funny coming from a simple-minded dunce, barely capable of stringing together a coherent sentence. Do yourself a favor and walk away before you completely embarrass yourself. You're hopelessly out of your league.
I'm not going to dive into the whole UBI — or in my case, UBD (Universal Basic Dividend) — discussion. All I'll say is that it <i>is</i> entirely feasible and would not bankrupt the U.S. There are various ways to fund it, such as establishing social wealth funds, but that’s a conversation for another time.
As for the United States, I agree — a Swiss-style model wouldn't work under current conditions, and for the exact reasons I always point out: we are a multicultural and a multiracial society. This is why I advocate for a White homogeneous ethnostate. A social democratic welfare state can only function and thrive in a society bound by a shared identity. Had we established this in the 1940s and ’50s — when America was still over 90% White and European — it would have been highly successful. In fact, FDR implemented several socialist policies that truly made America great, many of which still help people today, though they are constantly under threat from evil selfish right-wing libertarians who despise the idea of helping their fellow citizens.
Since the 1960s, however, things have steadily declined. The opening of our borders to non-White, non-European immigrants, the Civil Rights Act, and the rise of feminism have all contributed to our nation’s deterioration. We no longer share the same values, heritage, or even the same language. In such a fractured society, a European-style welfare state would only fuel division and resentment — as we see now, with foreigners receiving benefits that should be reserved for citizens.
And that is why we need a White ethnostate, or at the very least, segregation.
It did. And it does. It seems we really do live in the most interesting timeline.
Well that is what I do here. I advocate for White Nationalism — not as something evil or racist, but as an expression of love for my people, pride in our heritage, and a desire for an exclusive nation where we can thrive, with a system that works for our benefit and no one else’s. However, due to the political climate — where our culture was in the grip of wokeness — anything positive said about White people was deemed not just politically incorrect but racist. So, I decided to lean into it, embracing the labels of "Nazi" and "fascist" while subtly rejecting actual Nazism and fascism. Instead, I redefined these terms to represent conservative socialism, a White-homogeneous, socially conservative welfare state — something I semi-jokingly call National Socialism.
LMAO I love that. That's funny.
I went to a predominantly black school in Chicago from first to sixth grade, but the students were kept segregated (like in prison). The Polish kids had their own classrooms with a Polish teacher, and the same was true for the Mexican kids. Only White American students had to endure being in the same classrooms with blacks. Then we moved to the suburbs, where there was only one black kid in the entire school. High school was also in the suburbs, and while there were a few black kids, I only had one in a class during my time there.
A Black guy lives next door to me. We chat and have a beer sometimes. It’s funny because I’m a Nazi, and he knows. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
What FilmFlaneur said is a pretty good description of what I do. I'm essentially a deeply conservative socialist — left on economics, right on cultural issues. My ideal society would be like Switzerland economically (a welfare state) and Poland socially and culturally (a traditional, conservative society).
I often engage in self-parody, presenting these sincere views as 'National Socialism' to be provocative and humorous. But even that has a layer of sincerity because 'National Socialist' carries a double meaning. You can interpret it as Nazi, which I obviously am not, or you can take it literally — as a socialist who believes in nationalism, specifically White Nationalism. In that sense, it’s accurate.
My ideal society would be a homogeneously White, high-trust nation like Switzerland or, even better, Poland. I oppose multiculturalism, multiracial societies, and forced diversity. However, I support a European-style welfare state, making my views a blend of nationalism and social democracy. Since I advocate for expanding the welfare state even further, I describe it as socialism. Nationalism combined with socialism is, quite literally, National Socialism — hence the joke.
Hope that clears things up.
Wow, thank you for the kind words, Film. That’s a pretty accurate description of what I do here.
Does your boss's son have any interesting stories about his neighbor?
My vision is Star Trek too — just with a little less diversity and a little more White Fucking Power.
I really like what you said here, Melton. It seems we share the same values and goals. I understand the need to punish, as I feel that urge myself when it comes to the Wokes. But I do try to balance it with compassion and understanding. I don’t often succeed, but I do try.
When it comes to wokeness, I think the tide is finally turning in our favor. I can feel us moving closer to the world we want to see. Of course, I want to go further, much further, towards a society where people can truly flourish — where they are prosperous economically, morally, and spiritually.
I believe we’re taking our first steps toward some of those areas.
Well said Semi. 👍
I hope FilmFlaneur knows that he’s an integral part of this community. Any disagreements we might have are just that — disagreements. He should always feel welcome here.
All great points. I’m hoping Dexter: Resurrection lives up to the original. If we’re really lucky, we might get two good Dexter shows running concurrently for the next several years. That would be incredible.
A good leader is strong, decisive, and commands respect. They possess wisdom and sound judgment, always thinking carefully before acting. With a clear vision of the path ahead, they guide their people with purpose and conviction. Compassionate and deeply committed to serving as the true voice of the people. To be the very best of us.
You do realize I can do both, right? I can acknowledge the good Trump has done while calling out the harm he’s caused. Haven’t you spent enough time confined in your little box Don’t you want to break free from its rigid walls and start thinking for yourself — beyond all the propaganda? Come on, Keelai, it’s not too late. You can do it.
https://i.imgur.com/lII8Kc6.png
In a National Socialist state we have ways of dealing with subversives.
So what you’re saying is — I’m just four degrees of separation away from Clarence Thomas?