MovieChat Forums > JohnBraun604 > Replies
JohnBraun604's Replies
No nothing that clever really. Just the very notion of the spectacle gives RJ a boner and he is self-congratulating himself.
I personally did not find it funny. Mona Lisa is priceless art. The notion of it being destroyed is just not amusing or funny. The film is saying it is so smart and clever, almost above Mona Lisa, it is so clever. That is sad.
No shark jumping in RJ's second film in his own overrated Knives Out trilogy - I don't see him absolutely destroying the franchise as he did for Star Wars franchise. Where is the disparaging milking scene in this? Also I don't get why destroying the Mona Lisa is remotely clever or entertaining.
Really so what?
Haha well said :)
Amazing! Thank you so much for this article link and explanation. Glad to know I wasn't the only one who noticed!
haha Tarrantinoish!!! :)
I thought Booker was getting conned in the alleyway and the guy with the gun was the Salino, by the level of realism you don't know.
1) I watched The Sting after re-watching Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
2) What did you think of The Sting 2?
The shooting in the head was cartoonish and then 3 minutes later another silly shooting. We are not sure if it is real or fake because the violence depicted is done in a way that you don't know what is real or fake. I guess it's not the point, of the film I know.
Thanks for the post! :)