ArgentinianBuff's Replies


Not one nor the other. He was the normal likeable character at the begining of the film. He is the one that the espectator will most likely be identified with. The other characters are (very cartoonishly) portraided as freaks, outsiders. The twist of the movie is that when fame strikes, the freaks remained true to themselves and "the normal guy" didn't. So it's a nice way of putting "the normality" in perspective regarding art. He was the bad guy, but I think he is also the victim of the social media logic, so he can't be trully blamed for his bad manners. Someone in the top comments said that in the original play that this movie's novel is based the two lead characters have a ceremony where they dance in the family's clothing So according to this guy filmmakers from Poland set their movie in Poland as a wink to americans... it's amazing how the imagination of the self centered works... keep on trucking (I liked the movie) That doesn't make any sense. Movies are movies. Pretty insensitive comment for a clearly feminist movie