MovieChat Forums > MarkDaniels > Replies
MarkDaniels's Replies
That's what these toxic fans want. This film can honestly just be considered to be the next epilepsy trigger.
I agree. Fans are treating this film as if it's the next coming of Christ. The fact that fans are already considering that this whole Snyder Cut is already masterpiece is baffling to me because oh it's "the Snyder Cut" so it's automatically great. And I hate to bash this film like this because I am a comic book fan especially of Batman but man, these DC fans want nothing but a complete mess of a film.
Exactly. Even though all these excessive delays are disappointing, they are doing what's necessary for the films success and for the sake of the franchise. It definitely doesn't have anything to do with reshoots or whatever. The film is completed and locked and will release when necessary.
It’s simply that you just can’t accept the fact that certain films receive such high praise by many that you happen to not like. Don’t make some lame excuse that the acclaim Skyfall and CR received was just a way for journalists to have access to free screenings. It doesn’t work that way. These critics were given access so that they can spread out their initial honest thoughts about these films. There’s no proof that these critics only give these films praise just so they can get free access. If that was the case in terms of your logic then maybe QOS and Spectre would’ve also received high praise as well, but they didn’t therefore critics can actually admit to a not so great film and not just praise everything.We live in a world where no one has to agree with another.
I guarantee if you yourself loves a film that has also received many praise then the story would be different for you and that you believe the critics are right. But if a film that you happen to not that has received a wide variety of praise by many than you would say that these critics are somewhat fake and only give these films great reviews for special access.
The whole point of a film critic is to give their honest opinion about a film. If critics don’t like a certain film or an actor’s portrayal of a character, then they would step up and report that does aspects didn’t come to their likings. If you don’t think RT is accurate, how about taking a look at metacritic. Critics who also report on that site also praise Craig’s Bond as well as films such as CR and Skyfall. If you don’t like these films than that’s fine, it’s your opinion however you don’t have to hate on others that may disagree with you and say that critics are somewhat fake nowadays because they happen to praise certain things you don’t like.
Qos wasn’t that great, but then Skyfall came out and look at the praise that film got.
Do you not realize how much acclaim CR and Skyfall got. Both of those films are regarded as one of the best Bond movies ever. Highly prestigious sites such as Variety, THR, Total Film etc. regard CR and Skyfall to be some of the best Bond movies ever as well as Craig being one of the best Bonds. So how does that make me an “idiot” for being a fan of something that most people are as well, except for these boards?
I honestly just don't know any more. I just go as it is regarding how they treat the continuity of the franchise. We will just have to wait and see.
Then again I'm seeing so much of the same users creating similar threads on how this movie us gonna suck regarding either the work stuff or just "how much Craigs tenure as Bond sucks and that this movie will suck as well." Therefore why can't I do the same but actually bring some positivity.
However I do appreciate that you respect my opinion but I also don't think I people should just regularly trash Daniel Craig's Bond and his fans. We all have our own opinions and should respect one another, but don't just go around constantly hating on Craig and this film all the time as well as making Craig fans look like a bunch of idiots for being a fan of his along with the overall positive consensus towards his Bond.
I'm not saying we don't have a right to criticize. We can express our own opinions whenever we want and our opinions may differ than others. Sure people might disagree with the main consensus that Daniel Craigs Bond is regarded as one of the best Bonds and that's completely fine. Film is subjective. But this chat just seems to idioticaly put so much unnecessary backlash towards this film and Craigs tenure as Bond as well as not respecting others opinions who are a fan of his Bond. If you don't like Craigs Bond then that's fine abd you the right to express why you don't like him but at the same time you don't need to constantly put shit towards his Bond on and on as well as starting arguments with fans who support his Bond. There's really like no reason to hate on Daniel Craig Bond fans especially when he is regarding as one of the best Bonds by many.
Exactly. I get it, people have their own opinions and might disagree with others just like how this chat seemingly disagrees with the overall positive consensus of Daniel Craig's Bond. If you don't like him as Bond or his movies than that's OK but don't go around just spreading so much hatred for such an unnecessary reason and making fans who support him as Bond feel like idiots for being a fan of his Bond and agreeing with the overall positive consensus towards Craig's run as Bond.
I completely agree. The IMDB boards had way more mature users than this MovieChat site.
Many top critics consider him as one of the best such as prestigious sources like Empire, total film, etc. Look back at their old reviews for Casino Royale and Skyfall. Many film talk show companies also praise Craigs Bond such as collider and many other film related YouTube channels. Also a poll was made by the end of 2019 ranking all of the Bond actors and Craig was tied with Connery for number 1. I believe it was from Fandango.
That article you attached below doesn't even criticize his performance as Bond. It just talks about how he doesn't seem interested in doing another film after Spectre. It also doesn't make sense to me why you are putting so much hatred towards Craigs Bond because he only has 2 great films while your favorite is Brosnan and he only has 1 great film.
Absolutely. That's how I believe the film will be structured in terms of the development between Bond and Nomi. Then towards half way through the end of the film, Bond will be back in his prime and outshine Nomi hopefully. Therefore, that would not be a woke situation at all.
I see where your coming from in terms of killing Bond off. Yes it doesn't necessarily make too much sense if they kill him off in this one then they have another movie with a different actor helming the role eventually. I don't think that should be a big problem because if a new movie with a new actor does end up being developed, it will serve as a reboot for the franchise similar to Casino Royale.
Absolutely. Most of these users think they know the whole basis in regards to film production and they clearly don't.
I'll be ok if the new 00 does indeed outshine Bond himself in the first act of the film because it could possibly develop her character a little more and show us how skillful she is as a 00 agent. However like I said if its like that throughout the rest of the film then that could be an issue.
My prediction is that Bond will die at the end of the film and I actually don't mind that. I also agree with you regarding the worries about possible future spin offs for "whoever is 007 atm." That I definitely think is a stretch.
I understand about the whole "woke" criticisms but I honestly think people are also overreacting that this new Bond film is going too go woke. Just because there's a new female character that is supposedly gonna start out as the new 007 in the film doesn't necessarily mean that the film will go woke. The only thing that would make this film considered to be woke is that if they make Bond look like a joke throughout the entire runtime by having the new double 0 outshining Bond in regards to its action sequences making Bond look weak. I honestly doubt that will be the case but its possible it could turn out to be like that, who knows.
Maybe his films are half good. That doesn't mean Daniel Craig as Bond himself is half-good. He's regarded as one of the best Bonds right next to Connery by many and his overall run has been positive. Sure he's only had 2 great films but his weaker films like QOS and Spectre aren't even nearly as bad as previous actors weaker Bond films such as the last few Moore films and especially the Brosnan films.
Same. She wasn't developed the best in Spectre but her character still had debth to her and there could possibly be more development for her in NTTD. However I still like the fact that they ate bringing her back since it is rare that Bond girls return for sequels so I like that they are trying to do something different.
People just like to hate on everything on these boards for no apparent reason. I only read these threads and try to create some myself only to show how much they are overreacting negatively towards this film for no apparent reason.
Very. Specifically on these boards.