MovieChat Forums > SixOfTheRichest > Replies
SixOfTheRichest's Replies
What did he do for health care, while he was building up the might of the military?
I am not sure what your point is, apart from you wanting to call out homosexuals for their attitude. What is is you are wanting to prove or drive at? All I am getting from you is what you believe is an inclination towards pedophilia and misogyny, which you have no solid basis for, except what is your own projection.
Any bias is going to be reflected by the sexuality identity.
You single out Milo because he condescends to those that condescend. That is what you don't like about him, yet you are doing the same thing regarding homosexuals.
The US health care system is about profit before people and works in favor of the monied\wealthy. It makes them feel superior because they can afford to be cared for. Sick!
well for a start, female dynamic of homosexuality operates on a different sphere from male dynamic of sexuality.
I think it is about time for heterosexual people to not hesitate to call themselves out on their own behavior, which isn't any different for what you are calling out gay people for. The evidence is not biased.
You condescend to gay people, no differently than what you accuse Milo of doing.
It is your opinion, that is not evidence of proof or truth.
You seem to have issues with gay don't you. Have you seen someone about this?
Young and healthy people are dying of other things too and personal health is also a key attribute. COVID being a respiratory illness, smokers are likely to be at higher risk too, regardless of age.
There are many hellish illnesses. Influenza is a common one for many people to catch, yet we need more information and comparisons made. I don't take things in black and white mode.
<blockquote>I haven't gotten any satisfying rebuttal from you why the theory cant be true....</blockquote>It is your point. The onus is on you to provide solid factual proof of your claims on a broader scale, despite whatever evidence you are basing it on.
There is evidence for many things, including the misogyny, sexism, domestic violence and pedophilia of heterosexuals, but it doesn't mean that they all get lumped into the same category of attitude\behavior.
You are over-thinking it all to want to be proven right or have others agree with you.
Focusing just on the one thing, when it is not the only thing people die off and those that have contracted it and died, (like any other thing they may have contracted), it is more than likely they had other health issues that contributed to the death. We need to know what other influenza viruses people have contracted and died from to make a comparison and what are the other health issues involved with the patient who died? We are given superficial messages.
The truth is not the same for everyone. To claim what is only perceived as a personal truth about homosexuality, and in your case it was about misogyny and correlating it with pedophilia is pushing the envelope for many. It doesn't appear born out of any solid evidence or facts, except your own perception of an archetype. It is not empirical only anecdotal.
You are asking for others to explore your truth, but to what avail and to prove what?
I am not big on political correctness myself, but with homosexuality, a lot of strides have had to have been taken to get to some sort of level of acceptance by society and the establishment.
Lets not compartmentalize a few rotten apples in a barrel, to infect the rest of the dynamic. These exist in all facets.
We all have a right to our opinions, but not at the expense of demonizing
an entire category with a generalization that amounts to nothing anyway. This can be said of all otherwise.
I had a friend who had his own grunge style band and his lyrics were poetic. His music wasn't to my taste though and if I was to be honest, I though it was crap. Nirvana is the same to me. If one can't understand the lyric while it is being sung, I don't see the point of attempting to sing it. I am not into the groupie scene. Tortured souls looking for meaning in dark spaces.
Madonna could have had some experimental fun, but like you say, I think she was way too intelligent to let it ruin her. Madonna was controversial to an extent, but she wasn't dark like Winehouse. I'd say, her health and level of fitness was first and foremost important. She needed a clear head and a lot of this comes through in her film Truth or Dare. She was more about being uninhibited sexually and not about clouding her vision with mind altering substances. I really don't think she would have tolerated substance abuse, or even excessive drunkeness with her troupe.
Cool, Trendy, all just buzz words really and taste is all subjective. I could listen to Winehouse, but couldn't care a hootin' holler about Cobain. I wouldn't go out of my way to listen to her though and even the sounds she emulates in comparison, I don't often seek out.
Madonna is more fun and proven to be more level-headed and shrewd. She is also still alive.
I'd say common sense and rationale is what is key. Those that believe in a fairy tale are only desperate to hold onto their delusion for fear of truth not being what they want to hear, or want it to be.
People want understanding and meaning for their lives, but trying to find it in a savior who will take the burden of proof away for them, just so they can live eternal life somewhere, (in what form?), is a cop-out delusion and rather convenient don't you think. Nobody said the majority of the masses were intelligent or sharp.
Her tunes are still embedded today in the minds of many. She was a one of a kind.
I still watch Truth or Dare aka: In Bed With Madonna.
Madonna was pop sounding though, and designed for mainstream connection. She was a watershed, in that she knew how to market herself and her sex, make catchy sounds and was in a sense a brazen f<>k you to much of stiff convention. She was all girl and was going to make sure everyone knew it.
Touche!
I think more than anything, she is seen as a tragic figure and a victim. I don't really buy into that. Same with Kurt Cobain. They were self-destructive at their own hands. Grungy looks and sounds that don't really elevate anything in the music regarding skill and\or talent, just an image that people choose to connect with for representation.
What are these mainstream and modern attitudes that you appear to take umbrage too regarding homosexuality? You can only account for and own your own thought process as an individual.
Are there mainstream modern attitudes towards heterosexuality that would never be accepted, or is it about wanting to see one sexuality as being superior over the other?
I don't often place great stead in humanity. I think we try our best with what we know, but I also run by the notion that there are far too many people on the plant and it is bursting at the seams. It would also depend on how one perceives life, as just living as human as the be all end all, or is there more to it.
What we see reflected in other animal and vegetation life, is also a projection of our own lives. I take a cynical approach to humans more often than not and masculine feminine qualities as an objective, are more external, when these qualities are also within each and all of us as an internal. I know I would rather be masculine form than feminine form and appreciate my maleness.