MovieChat Forums > degree7 > Replies
degree7's Replies
<blockquote> and THEN finger Colin.</blockquote>
That’s a deleted scene not fit for audiences
I would still consider him a good actor. After all, just because Al Pacino has been in terrible movies for the past 20 years doesn’t mean he’s a bad actor.
Yes. His performance in The Fly is great. Unfortunately I think he’s been phoning it in since the 90s.
I can’t hear
You,
I’m too busy sniffing
2015 actually. Besides, it’s
Gonna be a battle between two senile candidates with dementia.
I’d rather snort blow out
Your mom’s ass
Maybe
Take it easy on him, his son died
Bite? I will absorb your worthless existence.
Crylo Ben
Like Trump?
Splish splash
Your opinion is trash
That’s disgusting, such people should be slapped
My point is that film is still higher resolution than digital.
They’re only “cheaply made” if printing process was done poorly or they cut corners, or it was copied from an intermediary print for wide releases. Otherwise, a 35mm showprint for a premiere of a film, from the original negatives, is automatically going to be higher resolution than any digital format. Every time. If you saw Star Wars at the Mann’s Chinese Theater in 1977, you would be seeing a higher quality image than any digital release.
Modern digital remasters are not done on film, they are converted to pixels and shipped via some kind of hard drive.
The only reason the original roll would be inferior would be if it was mishandled or dirt got on it somehow. But 35mm film in its original state is going to have a higher resolution than any digital remaster. All they really do is remove some scratches and fading, but that’s only because they stored the original negatives in poor conditions. Basically this “digital remastering” nonsense is just a cover for negligence, and to charge us twice for the same product in a different coat of paint. These reels are supposed to last thousands of years, which is far longer than digital data.
Yes
Remastered from the original negatives, but it doesn’t mean the resolution has been improved in any way except for home viewing. You’re still not getting the full experience.
My point is you said “just go watch the original version” when that would in fact be far superior.
Except the resolution isn’t being “tampered with”. 35mm film reels as they were originally shown already are equivalent and higher to 4K. The quality in the cinema would be far better than any home system. The only reason people even notice these things are due to the pause/rewind options.
As for removing or fixing goofs, I don’t see a problem with it. Would be nice if Coppola went back and fixed the bad, disconnected punch in the first Godfather using digital technology.
What are you on about, Paul is widely considered one of the greatest rock and roll bass players of all time, and influenced countless musicians.