MovieChat Forums > EleazarHisSon > Replies
EleazarHisSon's Replies
He is a movie critic with 1.83 million subscribers on YouTube.
Go and get someone else's attention.
Didn't Bond go woke in 1995 with GoldenEye?
Quoting articles is plagiarism now? Where do I claim that I wrote the article? That is a serious charge you made. Now, I challenge you to quote me where I make the claim to be the author.
I'm not the author of the article, if that is what you thought. It is written by a professor. I quoted the part about Predator. There is more text in the article that I provide the link to. He also claims that Alien is racist.
Here is a video discussing and criticizing the article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HifiNWeu6vc
If you were stoned or drunk when watching it, you may come to that conclusion, I suppose.
Conservapedia's opposite is RationalWiki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki
Well, I know that we learned to drink coffee from there. I'll give it to the Turks.
The commonly held view in Europe during the Enlightenment was that Islam, then synonymous with the Ottoman Empire, was a bloody, ruthless and intolerant religion. In the European view, Islam lacked divine authority and regarded the sword as the route to heaven. Hume appears to represent this view in his reference to the "bloody principles" of Islam, though he also makes similar critical comments about the "bloody designs" characterizing the conflict between Catholics and Protestants during the Reformation. Many contemporary works about Islam were available to influence Hume's opinions by authors such as Isaac Barrow, Humphrey Prideaux, John Jackson, Charles Wolseley, Hugo Grotius, Paul Rycaut, Thomas Hyde, Pierre Bayle, and Blaise Pascal. The writers of this period were also influenced by George Sale who, in 1743, had translated the Quran into English.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Islam#Enlightenment_Europe
I think that the movie was criticized when coming out for having not a single black actor. The opening scene in the sequel is sort of meant to serve as a response to the criticism.
He who reviews it in the video.
I disagree. This felt like it had no plot and was only a visualization of CGI effects from start to end. Not even Christopher Lee starring saves it. Say what you will about The Phantom Menace and Jar Jar, but at least it had a story.
The OP thinks that Temple of Doom is far superior because of its darker scenery which frightened little children in theaters and introduced the PG-13. He hates The Last Crusade for Spielberg, in his view, appealing to children after Temple's controversy by inserting a "Mickey Mouse" joke because children would not be familiar with who Jesse Owens was, as the line originally said. Like mentioned before, he has been going on about it and made probably at least a dozen of threads over the years.
To be honest, while it doesn't excuse the ideology, this movie shows some understanding for white nationalism and alt-right thinking. It is not like Mississippi Burning that portrays them as evil wife-beating savages, while black people and civil rights activists are innocent. Here, we see blacks taking over the neighbourhood and bullying the white youth. Why is Sweeney never shown dealing with that in the movie?
It also provides some arguments of the white nationalist kind that come off as rational and are rarely addressed with factual rebuttals (except for Murray at the dinner table scene), but only with an emotional response in the end. Yes, Derek befriends a decent black guy in prison and it goes to show that we should not judge their character by the colour of their skin, but none of the other problems are shown to go away.
Mary and Joseph went a day or so without realizing he was missing. Just like it took a while for Kevin's parents to discover that he was gone.
Rosario Dawson is completely naked and shaved in Trance (2013). It's rated R.
Well, in You Only Live Twice, Connery was turned into Japanese.
I'll have you know that it is mandatory to be circumcised in Islam. So you have something in common with them.
Unlike the progressive Muslims, you mean?