MovieChat Forums > wrlord > Replies
wrlord's Replies
That's bad. But has she lost Dat Ass?
You're goddamned right.
It was about a side of beef wearing a blue suit. It was not Superman.
Just one of the many ways this was not a movie about Superman.
Only people who don't understand or appreciate acting would favor this.
Spoken like a true fascist.
Psycho. It was made with a tv crew using tv techniques.
And, of course, he killed off his protagonist a third of the way into the picture.
Don't forget BLM. Though I'm not sure you can overreact to a fantasy.
This might be eroticism, but if you think this is pornography, you need to loosen up your bible belt and take a look at what you have down there.
I haven't seen the film, and tend to think this is so much nothingburger, but you're mischaracterizing the criticism, which is that this film portrays these girls in an erotic way in the process of making a statement that they should not be viewed in an erotic way.
You should factor in tv shows she directed. I'm sure there were a couple of episodes of Alfred Hitchcock.
No kidding. She could have put your eye out with on of those things. Stunning. How did she never make it huge?
No, what's unnatural is the modern way, with no one talking over each other.
Yes, she was a miserable bitch.
Didn't look any different.
You're a liar.
I was just wondering about that. I'd be shocked if they went forward knowing how sick he was.
What role did he play?
His Prospero in the park (and later Broadway, I think) was... not great.
Yes, why should we look at science, when all that matters is how he feels!
You lefties claim you're all about science when it comes to climate change, but when it comes to in utero babies feeling pain and the biology of sex, science is your enemy.
Pussy.