MovieChat Forums > e3e34ifj > Replies
e3e34ifj's Replies
Most of it is made up of two people arguing. You cant even read it.
Agreed. She can take gray pubes if millions of dollars come along with it.
This is definitely fake. The film hasn't come out yet, and the only one's who have seen it are the gorehounds and horror nerds who love this kinda stuff. Are you trying to tell me random grannies are waltzing into Terrifier 3 at a horror film festival? I don't buy it.
I agree, he was the only one who felt natural. He fit the weirdness and ridiculous of the screenplay very well, but he's also perfectly cast as a rich, spoiled man-child. I liked joking that he was never acting in any of his scenes.
You just feel pretty biased against Walz. I'm absolutely positive that Walz would "look younger" if you spray-painted him orange and slapped a blonde toupe on his head. Biden would too. Pretty much anyone would, I guess.
He definitely does not look older than Trump. Trump just hides his age with makeup and hair dye. Walz ages naturally. But you can tell Trump is 80 years old.
Plenty of gay men were married to women and had kids with them, like Elton John, David Furnish, Anthony Perkins, Ricky Martin, and probably tons of conservatives too ashamed of themselves to ever come out.
Movies not having enough nudity is not a legitimate complaint about cinema, it's a shallow one. If a gay man complained that there aren't enough penises in movies and called it a "legitimate complaint", that would be equally as shallow. You're complaining because you see movies for the wrong reasons. Once again, I recommend this website called Pornhub, where actresses get as nude as you'd like!
Gore is fake. Nudity is real.
"this movie didn’t have enough nudity...It’s a legitimate complaint about horror films"
HAHAHAHA jesus, what are you, some horny old man who only watches movies because of titties? You think the missing element of horror films aren't the story, characters, a great screenplay, etc, but no bitches? You really think some movies would automatically become better if you saw the lead actresses rack? There's a great website you'd enjoy called PornHub, has everything you want and more!
That was the conspiracy behind Terrifier 2. If you think about it, the only people going to see any Terrifier movie are already expecting extreme violence and gore. So why would they walk out? It's not like random Joe Shmoes are walking up to the theatre totally blind and saying "hmm, I hate gore, but maybe I should see the movie with the evil clown holding a knife on the poster."
Oh, it's pretty bad. Havent seen it in a long time, but it's more or less a remake/retelling of the original story, but it's made with the integrity and craftmanship of a high school project. It almost feels fanmade, which is funny considering it was made by Kim Henkel, who worked on the first film. I guess there's a reason why he never directed anything until this one. Also funny considering they got two future Oscar-winning actors. But yeah, this one is really bad.
They both had annoying faces. Vance was rizzing up the camera the whole time and Walz looked like he was gonna cry. Hated looking at both of them. But to ignore Walz had tons of great points is biased as fuck. He did a lot to give credit to both sides and made things fair from the beginning. Vance caught on with that tactic towards the end, but spent most of the time glazing Trump.
Seems fairly even so far, but I appreciate Vance's kindness.
I saw him as pretty badass. He was assertive with finding his wife and wouldn't take no for an answer. The stuff with the guy duck everything after that to the truck seat was all badass, and he shows no-nonsense badassery in every scene after.
I'd be down for a QT original series. I think the play he wants to do is a theatrical version of either Resevoir Dogs or The Hateful Eight.
I agree that nothing Spielberg's made past 2000 has ever surpassed Schindler's List or Saving Private Ryan. But I do think he's made plenty of excellent films into the 21st century, such as Munich, Lincoln, The Post, West Side Story, and The Fablemans. I think QT's notion that old directors don't make great films is bogus. I don't think ANYONE would be mad if 80-year-old QT made his own The Fablemans.
It most certainly is. I laughed when the pedo subplot came up. You think he regrets defending Victor Salva so much?
I'm very surprised that it's opening so low. A lot of people in my personal life tell me it's because they "haven't seen a single ad for it" but I have seen several, so idk where people are (or aren't) looking. I think it's likely because of the word of mouth around the project. For the last few months, people have had mostly nothing but negative things to say about it. So audiences subconsciously decided to skip the movie months ago.
So I imagine this will probably settle at $15-20 million worldwide. That's atrocious.
John Cena is actually a really good actor who has just never been in anything worthwhile. He was great in Ricky Stanicky, an awful movie. So don't put all of his success on the overrated James Gunn.