MovieChat Forums > kuku > Replies
kuku's Replies
<blockquote>Are you seriously trying to imply that the mere existence of women and races other than whites is the "woke" part of society?</blockquote>
Actually, the 'woke' part of society is almost fully white. 'Wokeness' is (with a few exceptions) a religion of white people.
Deep Purple
1. The Thin Red Line (1998)
2. The Man with One Red Shoe (1985)
3. Red Corner, 1997
4. The Red Shoes (1948)
5. The Hunt For Red October (1990)
6. Deep Red (1975)
7. Red (2010)
1. Prince of the City (1981)
2. Training Day (2001)
3. Bad Lieutenant (1992)
4. Magnum Force (1973)
5. Unlawful Entry (1992)
6. Witness (1985)
7) Léon: The Professional (1994)
8. Rampart (2011)
9. Torrente (1998)
It's a British series.
1. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs / Sleeping Beauty
What's small, round, green, and goes up and down, up and down?
<spoiler>a pea in an elevator</spoiler>
There's a comic saga in France which is about Blond jokes. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Blondes)
https://www.soleilprod.com/images/planches/blondes-la-compil-des-vacances_3.jpg
The James Bond new movie example is indeed another example of political narrative. The 'black woman' is actually another (more) white male character played by a black woman. A male with black boobs.
In the movies, Bond always had a tough time fighting some physically superior opponent. In the case of the new black woman, and because of biological differences, <b>every</b> opponent should be physically superior... and however you already know she won't have any problem kicking asses.
And what about psychology? Bond, in a nutshell, was a very British pychopath male. A black woman would be <i>nowhere near that</i>, she would be much more like Shaft mixed with Oprah. Of course, you know they'll just write the same old character, but casting a black woman (and then casting white males to play some idiots around). The same way the so-called "female doctor" is just a bad mix of Tennant and Mat Smith, but casting a white chick.
•"<i>And this is mainly the problem - what is with all these terms. [...] people like to invent terms like woke</i>"
Terms are necessary to name concepts. Yeap, people invent terms when language doesn't provide the necessary terms, which is often the case when we're talking about new religions or ideologies. But as long as those terms are defined with enough precision, that's correct.
•"<i>most people using the term, don't seem to have much to say apart from that term</i>"
I think you can't properly tell apart between a term and a message. 'Woke' is a term, it doesn't carry any message, not anymore than saying 'Mormon', or 'Yehova's Witness', or 'Muslim', or 'Catholic', or 'Taoist' or any other religious system of beliefs. It seems that the problem here is that you start assigning some imaginary messages when you see the term. Of course, it's difficult to pay attention to what people say when you start creating imaginary messages in your head.
•"<i>Like if you dislike the doctor being a female fine</i>"
And this is just a perfect example of how difficult is to pay attention to what people say when you create imaginary messages in your head. I haven't said such a thing. Indeed, I had said the opposite: I dislike this doctor not being really a female: it's just another male with boobs. The same the so-called 'diverse' characters are not really diverse, they're standard middle class white male characters played... by anything but white males (who are usually reserved to play cartoonish cucks or villains).
•"<i>I was originally against it myself sadly</i>"
And however, I was originally <i>for</i>. It seemed (to me) quite interesting how regenerating in a female body would affect the psychology of the Doctor (biology influences behavior). That could give some good character study. Instead of it, we had another (more) male with boobs and (more) woke political/religious narrative.
<blockquote>offended/insulted by anything and everything</blockquote>
Nope. Not anyone and everyone insults. You do. And you're not even "offensive". You're just somebody that quickly resort to personal attacks and insults in a forum. That's all.
Mike Stokalsa (RedLetterMedia) invented a much better term for that behavior: 'passive progressive' 😁
Watch after you've finished the episode, to avoid spoilers
https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/kingdom-season-2-on-netflix-coming-to-netflix-march-2020/
Brace yourself. The ending is the scariest moment in the first six episodes. It's not an ending, though, just a cliffhanger.
Good news: the next episodes are as good as the previous ones.
Bad news: the six episodes are only half of the show. The final six episodes will be released next March.
Actually, I'm doing different. I'm not insulting you.
<blockquote>Anti-woke/SJW commentary has now become as annoying</blockquote>
Why woke people always end up in personal attacks and insults?
Whatever.
Yeap. And chances are he'll be blacklisted from now on.
<blockquote>Do you want Doctor Who to reflect a different culture/society from the one its made in?</blockquote>
Well, <i>that's the problem</i>. The series was made by the BBC, which a state media broadcaster supported by taxes.
The company should be <b>neutral</b>. And that was the case for many years, when the BBC used to be the top European TV broadcaster, only with France Télévisions being somewhere near. Now, as you said yourself, it's a company completely dominated by one specific part of society: the woke parish.