MovieChat Forums > movieseeker101 > Replies
movieseeker101's Replies
He said no conflict which is untrue.
[url]https://moviechat.org/tt2488496/Star-Wars-The-Force-Awakens/5a46e96e5246e80014db26f1/OK-fanboys-lets-go-at-it-from-a-different-angle?reply=5a48a1121540e90014d26095[/url]
[quote]Conflict is the essence of drama. No conflict = No Drama. No drama = Boring. MaREY Sue is boring because she has no conflicts.[/quote]
His words. Untrue Rey has conflict with Kylo Ren, Luke and conflict about where she comes from.
With Rey Specifically. He said she had no conflict in the Last Jedi. Here is the definition of conflict.
to come into collision or disagreement; be contradictory, at variance, or in opposition; clash:
[url]http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conflict[/url]
This does happen in the Last Jedi. It does not matter if you thought the film was trash, there is still conflict in the film.
Yet I do not see you correcting your pal landofree on there being no conflict in the new Star Wars films.
He is credible because he agrees with you. Wow talk about biased. Anyway he said there was no conflict in the new star wars films.
That is completely untrue and I do not see you correcting him.
Would you do the same for Star Wars? I do not see you doing it.
Why is that my job anyway?
I know but do not cite him as credible from now on. He is an idiot according to you.
I only heard about this site recently. I do not need to convince you. So I have no idea what you're talking about move on to another point.
Make sure you confront your little comrade though. I heard you say only morons like Last Crusade so by your logic that makes landofree a moron.
Was never a member of imdb. So this point is irrelevant. Nice try though.
In convincing detail? All you did was say he needed to do it in order to be intimidating. I would rank Michael Keaton above Bale. Bale is not even in the same league as Keaton's Batman.
In my opinion you are angered by the success of the new Star Wars films because you do not understand them.
You heard me on your little comrade landofree right? He thinks Temple of Doom is trash and Last Crusade is way better. You sure you want to align yourself as close with him as I see you doing?
The point was debunked because you disagree? Nope I am entitled to dislike it and you're entitled to like it.
Michael Keaton did it perfectly. He whispered and sounded much more intimidating to me.
So I did move on I like Keaton a lot better. Bale did not end up intimidating to me, he ended up making me laugh at how forced it was.
I just recently joined this board so I have no idea what you're talking about.
Oh no none of those are my problems with the movie. How about Bale's awful Batman voice? It sounds like he has throat cancer.
And I get the Batman films completely there is not much to understand.
Nope it is a trash film. The fact remains that if you understood the new Star Wars you would love them.
I have voiced several critiques of the prequels and why I dislike them. So nice try. Again if you're into a stupid throat cancer sounding Batman with lame exposition be my guest that is your business.
You know your boyfriend landofree thinks Temple of Doom is a trash film right? Just thought you should know that since you guys are in such close cahoots with one another.
[url]https://moviechat.org/tt0087469/Indiana-Jones-and-the-Temple-of-Doom/5a45e3ef5df6d30014465172/The-Last-Jedi-of-Indiana-Jones-film[/url]
[quote]It doesn't make any sense, and it has bad casting. Glad Spielberg said that The Last Crusade was his apology to fans for this wreck. The Young Indiana Jones series was better than this.[/quote]
His words lol.
Never said they were. It is a subjective opinion. Since it is a subjective opinion by you I am allowed to disagree. As you are allowed to disagree with me. I think you are a pathetic Nolan fanboy who thinks he can do no wrong.