MovieChat Forums > SnagsWolf > Replies
SnagsWolf's Replies
This thread is a perfect example of how liberals are capable of denying reality.
This has to do with the books, but...
Michael Connelly said in an 11 March 2013 Q&A that, "Harry's in his early 60s now, and pretty soon he's going to have to retire, and so his daughter is getting increasingly bigger part in these stories. At some point things will shift and she will become the main focus of my writing."
[quote]Also, apparently Ringo had a cameo or small roll in this, according to IMDB. Missed that.[/quote]
IMDB is listing someone as playing Ringo, not Ringo being in it.
I guess it was one of the guy's whose feet were shown on Corden's show.
I really enjoyed it. Going in, I thought I was going to like it, but not as much as I did. A movie with a good heart.
I enjoyed it. Fit in well with the other 3.
"My mum home skooled me "
Let me guess... it was a sex-for-grades situation?
"You do realize Barr's summary CONFIRMED multiple efforts by the Russian government to interfere in US elections?"
While Obama was president. And Obama assured us there was no way the election could be interfered with.
"There is no serious person out there who would suggest that you could even rig America's elections, in part because they are so decentralized. There is no evidence that that has happened in the past, or that there are instances that that could happen this time," -- President Barack Obama, October 18, 2016.
But I guess that was Trump's fault too.
"there are people out there"
This is funny coming from the side that attempts to shut down conservative speech every chance they get. While you found one example of some nut claiming to want Trump to be a dictator, there are many examples of leftists acting like one. Including Obama, who weaponized the IRS and instructed his Justice Department to go after anyone criticizing Muslims.
" If you like this sort of garbage, don't invite me to any of your parties."
Okay, I won't.
Moron.
"You do realize he has not been exonerated for Obstruction? "
And you haven't been exonerated from any crimes either.
It was an investigation. If they'd found proof of obstruction, they would've included it in the report.
Hard to believe you're calling other people stupid after your two years to claiming Mueller was going to take him down for collusion.
Hahahahaha! It's Mueller Time! Hahahahahah.
Idiot.
Democrats for the past two-and-a-half years: "Mueller is going to find the truth! You'll see! Trump is going to jail!"
Democrats now: "Mueller didn't find the truth."
Fucking hilarious.
"Cleared on Russia, not on Obstruction. "
There's DoggieDaddy clinging to the very last shred of hope.
It was an investigation. They either found evidence of Obstruction or they didn't. If they did, they would've presented the evidence.
How sad that all your jerk-off fantasies have been crushed.
Good point. If Trump had paid a Russian for a fake dossier on Hillary, the Dems would be screaming that was proof of collusion. But since the fake dossier was on Trump. they have no problem with it.
We're over two years into Trump's term, and I'm still wondering when the 'dictatorship' is going to start.
Hell, Trump can't put an end to Obamacare, stop radical Muslims from entering the country, or even get his wall built.
As far as dictators go, Trump is a piss-poor one.
I'm guessing they're going back and deleting all their posts where they claimed that Mueller would be putting Trump in jail.
[quote]I forgot the name of it, but the upcoming case is why some folks think Manafort caved. [/quote]
You forgot? Some folks think?
That's some tight evidence you have there, dipshit.
Actually, it's the libtards with Trump Derangement Syndrome who drive the posts on this board. It's like they get paid to post here, spending day after day, week after week, month after month, and year after year whining like bitches about Trump.
All you have to do is look at the number of posts started by those who hate the man, compared to those who support him. It's like they can't stop themselves. A true psychosis. They'd be lost if this board ever shut down.
[quote]Repubs are the ones with the Agenda. They can't stand that Life Changes, we might actually have Global Warming, maybe a lot of people don't want to be Corralled into Gender Stereotyping, maybe People who had the bad fortune to be born in Shit-Hole Countries might need a hand up.
Instead they want to skew things so that all the White Rich Guys keep making a crap-ton of $$ on the backs of the rest of us. They think somehow this is good for America, but they know it's not, it's just for them and their ilk alone.[/quote]
You just swallow the lies without gagging, don't you?
You sound like a twelve-year-old telling scary ghost stories. Oooh, those scary Republicans!
"one senator brought it up and nobody else ever followed up and took it seriously. "
They obviously took it seriously, since not one of them complained about it.
"In that case, I assume you support a revolution to remove Trump since he lost the popular vote?"
I've posted many time about how the popular vote is meaningless in a presidential election.
See how that works? I don't agree with the opinion, so I state I disagree with it.
Moron.
Yes, it is. Libtards always confuse their opinions with facts.