MovieChat Forums > alanparsons > Replies
alanparsons's Replies
I can keep up with the times. And I can also voice my disgust at it. Racism against white people will not be tolerated. The specific ethnic replacement of white people in film won't happen without people calling it out for what it is.
> Get those colored people off the set and back on to the cotton plantations and orange groves where they belong.
Hollywood is ethnically replacing white people in roles, instead of starting original shows with non white people. It's blatant racism against white people and not pro people of color to be doing things this way. I would ignore it if it weren't everywhere.
I'll still be alive, standing up to your open racism against white people.
There are a lot of movies and music that encourage black supremacy. You should start standing up against that.
Died "after a long illness"
So probably AIDS because he was gay
I'm absolutely correct in both. The right promotes abstinence, and waiting until you're married, and that fathers are protectors who should help encourage their daughters to not be promiscuous, and the left is the exact opposite. The left promotes sexuality, encourages children to explore their sexuality, thinks that "body counts" on women don't matter at all, sees zero problems with sex before marriage, declares it's not a fathers' place to influence their daughter on what is an appropriate age to start having sex, and treats sex workers like it's any other profession. The left declares that women who run around taking on as many guys as they can are "liberated". It's insanity.
It's another stupid leftist movie trying to insult something as natural and right as a father trying to encourage their daughter to wait until they are older to have sex. This thing where leftists feel they are instilling MORE dignity into women by encouraging them to be whores is insane.
<blockquote>It was written by clueless guys who don't know what it's like to be a woman.</blockquote>
It was written by feminists trying to push a feminist worldview. Like "women have it just as hard as men to get laid". It's pure BS because feminism is pure BS.
Lol, feminists say sexism is bad and then act openly sexist towards men, coming up with reasons why it's ok. The hypocrisy is staggering.
Hey one kid explicitly known as a foreign exchange student is the exact same thing as over half the gang now being nonwhite!
Do yo listen to yourself talk or do you just babble without thinking?
We complain about "wokeness" in everything because it's being applied to everything. Idiots like you are cheering on a blatant attack on white people and it needs to stop.
Her character is a "problem" because she was completely unnecessary to the story. The main protagonist "Hero Boy" does everything in the book just fine himself. In the movie, the black girl becomes something like a guide to him, seemingly knowing more than him and pushing the story along. She was created purely for female/black diversity points.
The nazis in most movies are portrayed as bumbling idiots with only a sense of "evil world domination". WW2 propaganda is still going strong.
Lol, still with the childish remarks, no actual response to give. Like I said, feminists are pathetic. One day the public at large will grow tired enough of it, more than we already are, and society will look back on forced leftist propaganda in the entertainment industry and cringe.
It can't be that good for all of this.
What we have here is another attempt for a show to push a feminist agenda and people are calling it out. Yes, you ARE being childish.
<blockquote>You really think that is what Walter Tevis had in mind when he wrote the book that this film was based on.</blockquote>
Of course. He chose to make his main character female. It's feminist nonsense. If he wanted to portray reality the character would have been male, since males have been absolutely dominating chess across the entire world since the inception of the game. No amount of mental gymnastics that you can come up with can make up for the fact that no woman, not now, not 15 years ago, not 150 years ago, has had the ability to beat the best men in chess. Yet he made the character female because there was another stupid feminist wave during that time.
Women have been playing chess for a LONG time, WAY longer than 1977.... or did you not know that? Recognition of being a grandmaster or not, no woman has every been comparable to men at chess, ever. And from 1977 to now, 45 years, where's all the female chess champions regularly beating the best men if you're asserting what's been holding them back is not being called a grand master? They don't exist. Stop living in your fantasy world.
Women are indeed better than men in some aspects. Men are better than women in some aspects. Like I said, and I know this is going to take a long time to sink into that concrete head of yours... MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL. That's why the pathetic attempts by feminist morons to force gender equality is stupid. That's why this novel and this series is stupid. It's crap propaganda and it does not align with reality.
<blockquote>I could never see why people are so opposed to feminism; the idea that women can be the equal of men. Only a caveman would be opposed to that.</blockquote>
When you create fake female characters because no woman has ever come close to the accomplishments of men in a certain field, that's simply propaganda. You are living in a fantasy world. When there are dozens of GM chess women that regularly compete with the highest caliber men AND WIN, then we are witnessing ACTUAL equality. Until then you are simply lying and getting mad at anyone that doesn't go along with the lie. I have a BIG hint for you, men and women are not equal. Chew on it for a while. Look at the real world and stop being a feminist fantasy moron.
Lol imagine creating a fake female chess grandmaster to make pathetic feminists not feel inferior.
<blockquote>Oh I didn't realise that only Bobby Fischer in drag would satisfy you.</blockquote>
This is what leftists do, when they are proven wrong they make childish remarks and act as if that's vindicated them. CLEARLY this woman was nowhere near the ability or influence or achievement of Bobby Fischer, or a slew of the greatest chess players of all time (men). You failed hard here, but you're too ignorant to even understand it.