MovieChat Forums > GreenGoblinsOck8 > Replies
GreenGoblinsOck8's Replies
Yeah. Like this version I read as a kid where Belle's evil stepsisters get turned into stone statues by the Prince/Beast at the end. Though it has no Gaston or villagers in it so it might not interest the TC.
Well Lafou does get stabbed in the butt by the Candle Stick guy. That probably is gonna be felt in the following days.
I can't imagine John Travolta as Forrest Gump. Plus if he was in this he would not have been in Pulp Ficton. Which might be a negative.
I admit to being ignorant on the subject cause the only movies he directed that I have seen are the Evil Dead movies, The Spider-Man movies, and Dr. Strange Multiverse of madness.
Probably another horror film.
I just watched this movie for the first time a few years ago. I found it pretty scary and unsettling. I probably will watch it again sometime. I have not wanted to watch the sequels to it cause I have heard they are all sillier in tone than the original.
Now thinking of it, it's even more unrealistic in Terminator 2 cause the terminator somehow shoots it in a way so it doesn't hit any of the cops. Still entertaining to watch though.
It's always been like that. Like the TV version of Ghostbusters where Ray calls Walter Peck Wally Wick and Peter says, "Yes it's true. This man is some kind of rodent. I don't know what." Just like the example the TC gave it's not anything anyone would say.
Doh. I didn't see I'd already brought that up 7 years ago. Oops.
You are aware the original Invisible Man movie came out in 1933, right? How could it be a remake of something that came out around 50 years later? Unless you are talking about the remake of it a few years ago. In which case, I doubt it. Personally I never heard of The Entity and neither has anyone I know.
To be fair, maybe she hadn't paid her water bill and was just getting water to drink.
I'm an American and I never watch football or any other sport. I find them boring. I'll probably watch an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie instead of the superbowl.
She's in her 60s? In the videos and pictures I've seen her in she looks no older than maybe 45. But I have a girlfriend and frankly she has way more in common with me than Kamala Harris ever would. Then again, I'm not sure I'd date a 60 year old anyway.
Like some others said, there'd be saddness, and wait. A thought just occurred to me. What about every woman who is currently pregnant with a baby boy and is planning to have said baby boy? Those boys will grow up to be men. So therefore that other poster who said extinction would happen is wrong.
That was odd to me too. If her husband was older than her and she was 17, whether he knew she was or not, he'd be guilty of statutory rape. Unless the age of consent was 17 in California back then. Doh. Just looked it up. The age of consent in California as far back as 1993 was 18 so he would be guilty of statutory rape.
Then why didn't he get roller blades for his birthday at the end?
I remember a restaurant in North Carolina when visiting my sister, brother in law, and niece there that had goose in the title. But they didn't serve goose. It was a place that mainly cooked Hamburgers and hamburger steak. It wasn't bad but not my favorite.
1. Steak cooked a bit pink and I'd tell him about how I believe God created him, myself, and everything in existence. And that he sent his son Jesus to die a horrible death on a cross so all sins both human and alien could be forgiven.
2. Too small a Price and I'll never let go of your hand by Don Francisco.
3. I'm not even sure what material my clothes are made of so I can't answer that.
I'm probably getting this wrong. "You don't have to have a million dollars to do that. Just get on welfare like my brother." What's funny is I am pretty sure you can only get on welfare if you are married.
I don't celebrate it but my favorite movies with African Americans are Pulp Fiction, Die Hard, Die Hard 2, Die Hard with a Vengeance, Street Smart, Driving Miss Daisy, Shawshank Redemption, and Jumanji (1995).
I didn't see this til I was 17. I thought it was awful. I watched the first one as a young kid but didn't see the second one til I was 12 or 13. I think I saw the 4th one as a young kid too. Frankly I did see the VHS Cover of this one as a kid and it turned me off. It was just Superman carrying around a random guy. I had no idea who Richard Pryor was as a kid. And frankly Richard Pryor is the main problem I have with this movie. He's not funny or amusing. He's just annoying.
And like Nostalgia Critic said in his top 11 dumbest Superman moments video, he gets more screentime than Superman. Superman and Clark Kent feel like supporting characters in this movie. I'll never get them putting a comedian into a Superman movie. It was a bad idea. I may be in the minority preferring the 4th film to this one and finding it more entertaining. The 4th is bad but in a more amusing way.