MovieChat Forums > Ziggy > Replies
Ziggy's Replies
You were probably one of those guys in high school who would laugh and point if he saw a girl walk by with a spot of blood on her pants.
Or maybe you still are?
Should you have to bring your own toilet paper, too? Provide your own hand soap and paper towels?
It’s not really about expecting those things. It’s about getting caught off guard and not having to be humiliated.
<blockquote>Do you need citations and quotes and references? </blockquote>
That’s up to you. Keep making all the claims you like, but unless you can provide proof that your claims are true, you got nothin’.
I read your post. You provided no evidence. Plenty of accusations, but no evidence.
Yep.
I know you want to believe that what you said is true, but it simply isn’t.
JD Vance said that he made it up, and I proved it with my link. There are multiple videos, from multiple News outlets with the same proof.
You have zero proof to back up what you said.
Or, he knows everything at this point.
He said in the interview that he made it up in order to get the press to pay attention to him.
He said this on multiple news outlets. It doesn’t matter whether you think the outlet is liberal or not.
He said it … On video … He said it on video.
JD Vance said on video that he made it up in order to get attention.
<blockquote> On too of 20.000 dumped on a small city.</blockquote>
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say, here. Are you saying 20,000 pets are missing?
Actually, it’s a fact that JD Vance just made that up. There are no pets being eaten in Springfield, OH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hATLew-xxOg
You must have missed the fact that JD Vance said he made it up. There are no pets being eaten in Springfield, OH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hATLew-xxOg
This was also an isolated incident in Canton, OH, more than 170 miles from Springfield, OH.
JD Vance just made that up. There are no pets being eaten in Springfield, OH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hATLew-xxOg
So you're only voting for Trump because he's a man.
Most of the people voting for Harris are doing so because they like Harris and Walz and agree with them on most issues.
Your understanding of foreign policy is poor. There is no threat of World War III of the return of the draft. Trump would like you to believe there is, but there really is no basis for such a fear.
If you are too blind to realize just how upset Trump was that Harris got under his skin, there's probably nothing anyone can say to help you see the truth. Did you not notice how thin his skin is? He completely lost it when she said that people leave his rallies early. That's who you want as the President? Someone who can't handle a playground insult?
Your standards for The President of the United States are much, much lower than mine.
Harris look confident and in control. That is what we need in a President.
Are you under the impression that if you split hairs on the definition of "interrupting" that it somehow helps Trump not appear completely unhinged and pathetic?
Mumbling "That's a lie," out of ear shot and shaking her head is hardly going to keep people from hearing Trumps words.
If Trump wasn't rattled, why did he feel the need to address it. Do you really think, "I'm talking now," made him look impressive? It made him look like she was really getting under her skin.
The fact that she could so easily get under his skin (just by saying, "That's a lie,") shows how easier he will lose his cool when deal with actual problems and foreign heads of state. A President needs to be able to let the little things role of their backs.
Trump proved that he does not have the temperament to be President. All he does is make difficult situations worse.
Harris is calm, confident, optimistic and qualified. She can handle tough leaders, and she can handle them with class.
Yes, that much was obvious ... You seem to have failed to understand what I said, so I'll try again.
Harris (in 2020) was standing up for herself and very skillfully put Pence in his place. She showed the nation that she was a strong, confident woman, who was not going to let anyone walk all over her. She also showed that she could do so without being angry or defensive, something that Clinton struggled with.
Trump, on the other hand, looked angry, weak and petty. "Does that sound familiar," highlighted how childish he really is. At no point did this score him points. It only made him look pathetic.
You're the one believing Trump, not me.
Really? I thought it made him look sad. To have to say, “does that sound familiar?" made it seem like he didn’t realize that she owned Mike Pence with that line. It didn’t work so well for Trump. It just made him look like a whiny baby who knew he wasn’t being taken seriously.
I just assumed saying that he talked over her multiple times was sufficient. (Especially since he did that after almost every question.)
Sorry to disappoint you, but Trump didn’t even come close to nailing her with that “I’m talking now,” comment. He thought he was being clever, but he was so angry when he said it, he just ended up looking sad and pathetic.