MovieChat Forums > CoD > Replies
CoD's Replies
I did not know that. I watched it on demand.
It's a close contest, but I have to go with Elliott. Tiebreaker was his sense of fashion.
Isn't that what the first lady in Veep tried to do?
She is actually IRA and working with Jonathan Price.
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITS5GkkqgEQ[/url]
If anything the show is misandrist ever since the girlfriends took center stage. The four guys are constantly being emasculated by them.
The reputation of Thailand is pretty well known. The line came to no surprise to most of us, and those degenerates into children surely know many more details than the movie revealed.
No he wasn't asleep. The point is that they are able to function more or less normally (just completely disinhibited) on these drugs.
What isn't, these days?
He is a jock, so he doesn't have to choose. He can have both at the same time, and they pretend not to know about each other because they both (as well as the two Godspell chicks) want to be with the big hockey star of Manchester High.
F players like him!
It could not have happened to anyone. He is an alcoholic (he could not even watch TV at 2AM without going out for some more beer) and also did coke. He burned his house down while high and drunk.
Btw, the movie claimed that Patrick's mother was unacceptable choice to take care of Patrick because she was drunk. Lee even said that the judge would never let that happen. What was she supposed to have done that was so horrible, except passing out half naked? She seems to be sober now, while Lee is still drinking and getting into fights when drunk. Why would a judge let him be the guardian, and not the mother? Makes no sense, unless there is more to her that wasn't really revealed in the movie.
He is your typical jock. He has two girlfriends (and has sex with both), with at least two more pining for him, which leaves fewer girls for regular, non-jocky guys. F him!
Same puzzle, but wrong way around.
And at the end she talks to "dreamboat" which is the same handle Chris Wolff used when talking to her earlier.
Actions have consequences. Had he not been so obsessed about his radio he would not have taken up with Fring's revolution, and none of the rest of the events would have happened.
That does not mean he deserved to die for not turning off the radio. Hell, he didn't even deserve to die for trying to kill Sal. And the cops didn't even intend to kill him. But his death is the outcome of the choices he made.
And she turned him down because she didn't want to be tied down at college. Duh!
It seems that this show operates under the model that there is a great deal of "temporal inertia". As has been said, this is a fictional show with a fictional physics, but it does make some level of sense. If the timeline is changed too much (as it would be under butterfly effect) the time machine might not be invented, and our heroes might not be born. So, any change that would have that as an effect would lead to a paradox. Under large inertia model, those changes simply do not occur.
She is older now, at college. Believe it or not, many people go through a number of relationships at college. What's the big deal?