MovieChat Forums > samoanjoes > Replies
samoanjoes's Replies
They both feel the same to me.
Yes they do. When I was a kid I used to love how titles came up in films, like this one and Batman Returns.
Maybe you read it wrong and it said "Lena Dunham applauded..."
Lots of things of his have been "up" lately.
I think by the time she gets to Meryl's age, Kate Winslet may take the mantle. She has already done more variety than Meryl Streep has.
Sure, but they didn't need to show every death. We knew where it was going.
I was wondering the same thing. At one point it showed the poster for a Dr. Phibes show and it said 1902 or 1905 but if it took place in 1971 as the movie did, there was no way he would put on a show when he's 1 so subtracting 20 years from 1905 would make him around 90. He did not look 90 in the film.
I saw it 5 minutes ago.
It doesn't.
A few scenes did seem a little off.
Um.... why is the user above "Hollywood Reporter" without a post number beside and no possible way to click on their account?
I didn't know it. Thanks.
A lot of it looked like perspective to me.
I prefer it over the 1959 version. The sets were great.
I didn't even know this was based on real events.
That's just, like, your opinion, man.
"Tmdb isn't anymore flasher than imdb. It's just that Travis cares about how his site looks, being fair and not allowing bullying or trolling. The owner here only cares about making money."
Saying it isn't any flashier is subjective. Who are you to tell me what I think of the look of the site? And I like how you say we're spreading rumours about tmdb and then say the owner here is only interested in making money as if you have some proof. Also, I never said the moderators there ARE assholes, I said I HEARD they were.
The hunour is not for everyone. You have to accept the utter ridiculousness of it.
Similar, but not good: Ten Little Indians (1974)
You took the words out of my mouth. It's trying way too hard to look slick.