MovieChat Forums > samoanjoes > Replies
samoanjoes's Replies
Greatest site ever.
You're old blue eyes?
That was supposed to say, "am challenging you".
You're also not near a person when you call them 20 times a day and also don't have to pick up the phone, but it's still harassment.
As I said, it doesn't matter if they're offensive or not, jokes or serious, when some is being asked to be left alone and you keep going up to them, that's harassment. It's like if a woman breaks up with a guy and he calls her on the phone 20 times a day after telling him to stop calling.
It happened last night when this place was loading slow.
I'm not in Cuba and definitely not in that one. Just so you know, I've posted 2 other puns on various pages and am challenging you to find appropriate facepalms.
I'm in Cuba right now.
<blockquote> Making sexualized jokes that she found offensive. </blockquote>
You do realize that constantly going up to the same person who asks to be left alone regardless if it was offensive or not, is considered harassment, right?
Also, CBS didn't even handle it properly:
<blockquote>In a draft of the investigation report, which was reviewed by The New York Times, the lawyers said the company’s handling of Ms. Dushku’s complaints was not only misguided, but emblematic of larger problems at CBS. When faced with instances of wrongdoing, the company had a tendency to protect itself, at the expense of victims, the investigators wrote.</blockquote>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/business/media/cbs-bull-weatherly-dushku-sexual-harassment.html
<blockquote> I'm asking for evidence, no scratch that I'm not even asking for evidence, I'm asking for specific accusations of wrongdoing</blockquote>
I know what you're asking. And I'm asking you for the 10th time if you would leave your kid alone in a room with Joss Whedon <i><b>EVEN IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW THE SPECIFICS OF WHAT HE WAS ACCUSED OF.</i></b>
I've capitalized, italicized and bolded it for you because apparently you seem to playing ignorance to that part.
<blockquote>If it's not important enough to specify then it's not important enough for me to give a shit about.</blockquote>
It's your kid, it should be important enough to give a shit about whether the details are there or not.
Michelle Trachtenberg said Joss Whedon was not allowed to be alone in a room with her. </b>I am asking you if you would leave you kid alone in a room with Joss Whedon knowing that information as vague as that accusation may be. </b>The equivalence is the exact same.
You're purposely playing ignorant to the information because you know that you wouldn't leave your kid alone with him. You're saying nonsense like "why would my kid be on a film set if you said that they were alone".
It doesn't matter what he did. I'm asking you if you would leave your child alone with Joss Whedon even though 12 people have accused him of doing inappropriate things even if you didn't know what those inappropriate things were?
We all know you're LessThanZero87.
Also, you/LessThanZero87 have made way more posts about Pwinty/Sunjata than I've made about it.
Apparently it's difficult for you to say yes or no if you would leave your kids alone with Joss Whedon. But not responding to it actually gave me the answer.
nyctc, bro.
Not for you, sweet cheeks.
<blockquote>Madison Square Garden in NYC opened the first artificial skating rink in America in 1879!</blockquote>
This actually makes the New York Rangers look pathetic because they won the Stanley Cup only 4 times.
I may be in trouble after hearing this.
<blockquote>Oh no I got that your analogy was utterly retarded right away.</blockquote>
It wasn't an analogy. I asked if you would leave your daughter alone with someone who has been accused of inappropriate behaviour by 12 people. It's a simple question even if you take Joss Whedon out of the equation. But let me ask you even more bluntly: knowing the accusations given against Joss Whedon, would you allow your children to be alone with him for any reason?
<blockquote>What is Whedon accused of exactly? No more alluding to sexual abuse and be straight with it. Learn to read or have your vague claims dismissed.
</blockquote>
It has nothing to do with reading. Michelle Trachtenberg said that he wasn't allowed to be alone in the same room as her and she wasn't going to comment further. If she wishes to comment further, then fine, but that has nothing to do with reading. I don't care about the specifics. MANY people have accused him and chosen to speak out against him. They obviously know something we don't. And this isn't from one show. And it spans a few decades.
<blockquote>What was dealt with at the time? Be specific. What are the accusations? Because all of this vague smearing is utter faggot shit tbqh, and I hate Joss Whedon.</blockquote>
The understanding that he was not allowed to be alone with her in the same room is what was dealt with. I don't care if he touched her or hit on her, if the people on the show made that rule, Michelle Trachtenberg clearly said something to the producers or bosses.
<blockquote>
And Michelle Trachtenberg is the baby? It doesn't work still because you said the "babysitter" wasn't allowed to be alone with the "baby" so how are they even a babysitter?</blockquote>
Now you get it. You don't leave someone who has been accused of inappropriate conduct alone with a baby.
<blockquote>If it was considered a problem why wasn't it dealt with at the time instead of decades later?
</blockquote>
It was dealt with at the time. She only revealed it in 2021.