MovieChat Forums > TM1617-2
TM1617-2 (667)
Posts
The snowmonster is not named Bumble, he IS a bumble
In "The New Exhibit", does Martin kill himself?
Belle should tell Beast about the Christmas tree
Four questions about Forte
Is 'grinch' a tag or specie?
Why is the credit card reported stolen?
What does Batman give to the boy?
Nancy's wardrobe is symbolic
The significance of "Mr. Sandman"
Laurie's singing is a subtle joke
View all posts >
Replies
Thank you, PaladinNJ. Yes, but more than one death can be displayed gently. Slightly increasing the number would not make the movie inappropriate for a little audience. Gaston is not the sole villain, so he shouldn't be the only person who dies. The other four men also meeting their ends would better deliver the messages of the film.
Since you have an unusual and unsavory adoration of names, I expect you to at least use the whole ones of members. Ironically, my first reply has been to complement your topic, but you can't bear to read anything that slightly deviates from <i>your</i> speech. This makes me question why you even use forums. You have brought the ruination onto yourself by becoming acerbic over nothing. I have no idea what fuels your fuss, anyway, as discussion is explicitly not an adept focus of yours. Consequently, fretting that I will continue to participate in your threads is unnecessary.
You are deflecting from the facts that you don't comprehend my point and your first response to it is inappropriate. This is not about what happens in the scene which I'm not making fun of. The bottom line is that if Will were fortunate enough to know precisely what Freddy is, then it's possible that his magic would annihilate the slasher. Be sure of what you are reading before making an ignorant and insolent comment, especially if your complaint will barely form a sentence.
I beg your pardon urrutiap, as I am presenting a genuine question. The wizard master should have the ability to permanently incapacitate an evil ghost, but a chant won't work with the wrong word. That makes me think that there would be a different outcome if Will were to describe Freddy correctly. I can't imagine what your objection is, and you should be grateful that someone else is acknowledging your post instead of insulting whoever does so.
The fantasy could be worth something, urrutiap. Will uses the wrong word in his chant. Freddy is not a demon, he's an evil ghost who is <i>fueled</i> by a demon. I wonder if the man would be destroyed if the command were for a ghost to be gone.
CodyXBrenda, yes, that is one of Freddy's most malicious tricks, if not <i>the</i> most malicious. I, too, am surprised that Nancy is not suspicious considering where she is and whom she is dealing with. It's a smart moment, though. We know that the gloved killer is going to want to finish murdering the original Elm Street children, but it seems especially unjust for the young lady to die after all that she has done to fight Freddy.
JohnnyJohnson, you're right, it doesn't. Neil intends to bury Freddy in a proper place but can't touch the skeleton once it is animated. He has no choice but to try to give the slasher a makeshift spiritual rest.
Oh, you meant that the problem was that the only explanation for the country was that it had become totalitarian, and that, specifically, was not presented correctly. You and I mentioned very similar things about elements in this episode appearing only for convenience. It was odd that we agreed under the guise of disagreement.
You could be right, but the atmosphere is so relaxed and government's delivery so gentle that I don't gather totalitarianism. There is an obsession with executing people who are deemed a waste of time and space due to their occupations, which is a more specific issue. Although the devices match your suggested category, the attitude doesn't. Of course the country has gone unfathomably askew, but I'm not sure how well it fits a legal label. It might be more accurate to say that there is a fictional and impractical form of dictatorship created only for the moral.
Thank you. Yes, this show is in a class by itself.
View all replies >