MovieChat Forums > TM1617-2 > Replies
TM1617-2's Replies
Thank you, PaladinNJ. Yes, but more than one death can be displayed gently. Slightly increasing the number would not make the movie inappropriate for a little audience. Gaston is not the sole villain, so he shouldn't be the only person who dies. The other four men also meeting their ends would better deliver the messages of the film.
Since you have an unusual and unsavory adoration of names, I expect you to at least use the whole ones of members. Ironically, my first reply has been to complement your topic, but you can't bear to read anything that slightly deviates from <i>your</i> speech. This makes me question why you even use forums. You have brought the ruination onto yourself by becoming acerbic over nothing. I have no idea what fuels your fuss, anyway, as discussion is explicitly not an adept focus of yours. Consequently, fretting that I will continue to participate in your threads is unnecessary.
You are deflecting from the facts that you don't comprehend my point and your first response to it is inappropriate. This is not about what happens in the scene which I'm not making fun of. The bottom line is that if Will were fortunate enough to know precisely what Freddy is, then it's possible that his magic would annihilate the slasher. Be sure of what you are reading before making an ignorant and insolent comment, especially if your complaint will barely form a sentence.
I beg your pardon urrutiap, as I am presenting a genuine question. The wizard master should have the ability to permanently incapacitate an evil ghost, but a chant won't work with the wrong word. That makes me think that there would be a different outcome if Will were to describe Freddy correctly. I can't imagine what your objection is, and you should be grateful that someone else is acknowledging your post instead of insulting whoever does so.
The fantasy could be worth something, urrutiap. Will uses the wrong word in his chant. Freddy is not a demon, he's an evil ghost who is <i>fueled</i> by a demon. I wonder if the man would be destroyed if the command were for a ghost to be gone.
CodyXBrenda, yes, that is one of Freddy's most malicious tricks, if not <i>the</i> most malicious. I, too, am surprised that Nancy is not suspicious considering where she is and whom she is dealing with. It's a smart moment, though. We know that the gloved killer is going to want to finish murdering the original Elm Street children, but it seems especially unjust for the young lady to die after all that she has done to fight Freddy.
JohnnyJohnson, you're right, it doesn't. Neil intends to bury Freddy in a proper place but can't touch the skeleton once it is animated. He has no choice but to try to give the slasher a makeshift spiritual rest.
Oh, you meant that the problem was that the only explanation for the country was that it had become totalitarian, and that, specifically, was not presented correctly. You and I mentioned very similar things about elements in this episode appearing only for convenience. It was odd that we agreed under the guise of disagreement.
You could be right, but the atmosphere is so relaxed and government's delivery so gentle that I don't gather totalitarianism. There is an obsession with executing people who are deemed a waste of time and space due to their occupations, which is a more specific issue. Although the devices match your suggested category, the attitude doesn't. Of course the country has gone unfathomably askew, but I'm not sure how well it fits a legal label. It might be more accurate to say that there is a fictional and impractical form of dictatorship created only for the moral.
Thank you. Yes, this show is in a class by itself.
Thank you, jcnyclv. Martin is a serial murderer, whether historically or a newly formed one. It just isn't ascertained that he kills <i>himself</i>. I'm leaning toward it because of the mental breakdown at the end, but these episodes aren't always scientifically accurate. Maybe the figures <i>do</i> come to life and the matter is a metaphorical warning that never taking responsibility for your actions will catch up to you.
Popcorngal, I believe that the doll represents the fervent and dedicated love that a toy will give to anyone who accepts it, hence her dominant color. She is a misfit because she has never had a home where she's been appreciated and does not know if there is a place for her. The doll's desire for a bond might be more powerful than that of the average toy due to her design. Of course there is nothing wrong with a spotted plush elephant. In the era of this short, though, toys are much simpler and stuffed animals usually resemble their live counterparts. Maybe most people who have seen the elephant have laughed at him and complained that he doesn't look like a real one. They are not accustomed to the bright colors and sophisticated details in playthings that we are.
Darren, you have excellent delving. Those things are true, but in "The Obsolete Man", I don't think that the nation is totalitarian. It seems to simply practice the expungement of 'worthless' citizens. The idea is to make a country as efficient as possible, not to control every aspect of it. Romney's request being granted actually supports the manner of the government. The man is determined to be of no use, so it is believed that he is harmless and it doesn't matter to anyone how he dies. Yes, this episode has one of the best messages of the series.
Thank you, blue1981. Peter doesn't have his wallet but knows who does. The credit card is not missing, so the police should not invite the hassle that comes with reporting theft, especially when it endangers an innocent person.
Thank you, KingBob. There isn't for a general label within a network, but the information is surely recorded by the Miami police. Tracking a credit card is separate from tagging it stolen. After hearing the background story, the company should simply trace the item, and the police should not claim malfeasance without being certain that it has occurred, which it has not.
Thank you, samoanjoes. Yes, the authorities would be called, but since the card is not stolen, it shouldn't be categorized that way. Its use can be located without the label of a crime. If Kevin weren't frightened away from the hotel, then at least he would be safe until his parents could get him. The Miami department's approach only tortures the poor kid who has been through enough. Kate and Peter ought to be more mindful of the issue, but that is only assuming that they consent to the report, which is not clarified. If they don't, then the police should consider my points and not take such a matter upon themselves anyway.
Thank you. She doesn't say anything in terms of language. That happens when the brain wants to form words but is too confused and stifled to pronounce those.
That woman does not mutter, csweetleaf2. She babbles. The sounds that she makes are associated with psychosis. We don't know that the person is homeless. She might just be wandering and disoriented because she has missed her medication. Yes, the moment is unnerving, but it well supports the purpose of the scene which is to display how scary, disturbing, and dangerous the city is. It helps the audience empathize with Kevin.
The matter is like presenting instructions. To make a cake, you can use one large and rectangular baking dish, or two small and round ones. In that case, the word 'you' refers to anyone who wants the recipe, including yourself.
Thank you very much, PaladinNJ.