You don't know the slightest thing about "people like me," comics, or common sense.
Yes, I do, I just rolled out irrefutable facts and you got offended.
After countless retcons, reboots, new universes and re-imaginings, the only thing the current Batwoman (in the comics) has in common with the initial character is the name.
And you're so offended you completely failed to apply basic logic to the irrefutable facts I put out:
Batwoman was ALWAYS heterosexual, in every incarnation before the 2007 retcon.
It doesn't matter that different women donned the Bat-suit, EVERY incarnation was heterosexual BEFORE the 2007 reboot, where she was retconned into being a lesbian.
So, NO: she wasn't "originally heterosexual." That's like saying that Blue Beetle was originally Ted Kord. Or Carter Hall was originally a spaceman. Or etc. etc. etc. . .
Yes, she was. Every incarnation of Batwoman was heterosexual except for Kate Kane.
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2028464&page=1
You literally have no clue what you're talking about. She's been straight since the 1950s, as even acknowledged by every report (and DC Comics).
She was also heterosexual in the Mystery of the Batwoman film:
https://dcau.fandom.com/wiki/Batman:_Mystery_of_the_Batwoman
Literally everything I said was correct, and you have nothing to back up your point other than the propaganda you've been brainwashed to believe.
Thanks for proving my point: you don't mind the propaganda and even accept it because you're too brainwashed to think otherwise.
You can't even mount a coherent argument as to WHY she had to be retconned and turned into a lesbian. You don't even know. The whole point was to push an agenda, and even the creators of the CW show admitted as much.
But as I said, there's no hope to fix this problem, and people like you are a lost cause because you don't care about facts, truth, evidence, or the unflattering reality that you're a walking example of the Left's indoctrination patterns successfully being employed.
reply
share
Goliard (1451)
4 years ago
A buh buh buh:
"Yes, I do, I just rolled out irrefutable facts and you got offended."
You need to learn what "facts" and "irrefutable" mean. You're confused.
"And you're so offended you completely failed to apply basic logic to the irrefutable facts I put out"
You're mistaking amusement for "offense." You're confused.
"Batwoman was ALWAYS heterosexual, in every incarnation before the 2007 retcon."
That doesn't mean they changed her to a lesbian. That means they created a new character that shares the same name, who is a lesbian. There's a fundamental difference, which you seem unable to grasp. You're confused.
"Every incarnation of Batwoman was heterosexual except for Kate Kane."
Uh huh. As I said, those were different characters. OTHER "incarnations," if that helps you.
"Literally everything I said was correct"
Um. . .no. You need to look up "correct," as well. Because you're the opposite.
The "she" you're referring to didn't exist until multiple iterations of the character had been floated. This version has NOTHING to do w/previous Kate Kanes, except for the name. Different backstories, different parentage, different costuming, different body type, different hair, different orientation. Sad that you're having trouble grasping this (basic) concept.
reply
share
cyguration (3951)
4 years ago
That doesn't mean they changed her to a lesbian. That means they created a new character that shares the same name, who is a lesbian. There's a fundamental difference, which you seem unable to grasp. You're confused.
Man you're dense.
There have been multiple iterations of multiple characters, including Batman, Superman, Green Lantern, and The Punisher to name a few. ALL of their iterations have been heterosexual, because they're based on a character(s) who were originally designed to be heterosexual.
Batwoman -- in all her incarnations -- was ALWAYS a socialite and heterosexual. It was part of her character trait because she was a femme fatale; she used her sexuality as a trait to lure, deceive, and manipulate men. This played into HOW she performed and utilized her wits and skills as Batwoman.
They CHANGED one of her core traits to be a lesbian despite the fact the character has historically -- in EVERY incarnation -- been heterosexual.
This version has NOTHING to do w/previous Kate Kanes, except for the name. Different backstories, different parentage, different costuming, different body type, different hair, different orientation.
WRONG.
It's still Batwoman, and as I mentioned above, she's irrefutably been heterosexual until she was retconned into a lesbian. That's an irrefutable fact, kid.
Deal with it.
reply
share
Goliard (1451)
4 years ago
Yawn.
"There have been multiple iterations of multiple characters, including Batman, Superman, Green Lantern, and The Punisher to name a few. ALL of their iterations have been heterosexual, because they're based on a character(s) who were originally designed to be heterosexual."
SO much stupid in one post. Let's start w/the fact that none of that is relevant. Then point out that you simply repeated what I said, w/o understanding it. Maybe find someone smarter than you to explain it to you?
"Batwoman -- in all her incarnations -- was ALWAYS a socialite and heterosexual."
Wrong.
"It was part of her character trait because she was a femme fatale; she used her sexuality as a trait to lure, deceive, and manipulate men."
*Wrong.*
"This played into HOW she performed and utilized her wits and skills as Batwoman."
Sorry, but this is. . .wait for it. . .WRONG.
"They CHANGED one of her core traits to be a lesbian despite the fact the character has historically -- in EVERY incarnation -- been heterosexual."
The part you're still too stupid to understand is that it's Not The Same Character. Katy Kane is NOT Katherine Kane. In *any* way shape or form. They simply hewed closely to the name, for obvious (to functioning intellects) reasons. This is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from the "iterations" of Superman and GL we've seen (You're confused about the Punisher as well, but the thought of explaining that to you makes me tired).
You don't understand simple concepts ("retcon," "iteration," "logic") so rather than wish you good luck, I'll repeat my best advice: Find someone to explain it to you in simplest terms. You're not good at the thinking thing.
reply
share
cyguration (3951)
4 years ago
SO much stupid in one post. Let's start w/the fact that none of that is relevant.
All of it is relevant because character traits are what define
fictional characters.
Wrong.
Nope.
*Wrong.*
Nope.
Sorry, but this is. . .wait for it. . .WRONG.
Mystery of the Batwoman proves you wrong, as well as her many incarnations in the comic books between the 50s and 70s.
You obviously never picked up a Batwoman comic book before and have zero clue about the character other than being brainwashed to believe she was always gay (which she wasn't and never has been before the retcon).
The part you're still too stupid to understand is that it's Not The Same Character. Katy Kane is NOT Katherine Kane. In *any* way shape or form.
Doesn't matter. Batwoman's character trait was that she was a heterosexual femme fatale, in every incarnation before the retcon.
This is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from the "iterations" of Superman and GL we've seen
There are multiple Earth sector Green Lanterns, not just John Stewart and Hal Jordan, and they're heterosexual men. It's a character trait. Doesn't seem to be something you can come to grasp with, but your truncated grammar seems to be indicative of your intellectual capacities, so I understand the shortcomings you've accrued when attempting to calibrate your cognitive functions to wrap your mind around my previous examples.
(You're confused about the Punisher as well, but the thought of explaining that to you makes me tired).
LOL.....
https://screenrant.com/the-punisher-crazy-alternate-versions/
I'll repeat my best advice: Find someone to explain it to you in simplest terms. You're not good at the thinking thing.
Sorry (but not really) to tell you this, ace, but everything I've said is irrefutable. It's all backed by facts.
reply
share