Their list of reviewers doesn't change wildly from film to film. It's the same body of reviewers every time, every week. NYTimes, USAToday, RogerEbert.com, Slate..you see the same names every week. They don't bar certain reviewers for giving a boatload of negative scores. If that were the case, Armond White would've been banned a long time ago. He is still a certified, verified RT reviewer.
And if there really was a conspiracy to boost mediocre films, they would've been more praiseworthy in their reviews for these mediocre films and given them much more exciting scores. But Dark Fate got around 68%, nothing special. And the reviewers said it was nothing special compared to the original two Terminator films, just competent and better than the other terrible sequels (which is not a high bar to cross).
reply
share