Another WWII movie?
How many will there be this year?
Hope its better than Dunkirk and 1917.
This ones in Spanish.
sharedulce!
share
MovieChat Forums > Greyhound (2020) Discussion > Another WWII movie?
"Dunkirk" was lifeless.
"1917" isn't a WWII movie.
There can be as many WWII movies as anybody wants to make. Watch 'em or don't, your choice. Doesn't matter either way.
You must really know your history if you think 1917 is about WW2
shareHopefully more.
shareI didn't like Dunkirk: long, boring, and no dialogue. Didn't see 1917 due to the lockdown. But I'm watching Greyhound now. Seems good so far. As for WW2 films, yes, there are too many of them, but not many great ones.
shareYeah, WW2 is getting boring. We should start WW3 so the filmmakers would have new and exciting stories to show us with nukes and shit.
WW3 will last about 30 minutes and we all know the ending.
shareAnd WW4 is fought with sticks and stones
shareYou might want to credit that quote to the man who said it, ‘cause it wasn’t you.
shareHow about I admit it wasn't me (never said it was) and you do the reference work.
shareAlbert Einstein
shareThanks.
sharehttps://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/06/16/future-weapons/
He might have said it at one point, but everyone else was saying the exact same thing at that time and there is clear evidence that he wasn't the first one to say it.
It's only 82 minutes long - one hour and 22 minutes until the credits hit the screen.
shareI agree Dunkirk was boring as heck. Didn't see 1917, but that's not a WW2 film. I thought this one was pretty good. Not for everyone, but well done for what it is.
share