I'm burnt out.


I know I'll watch it, but I'm tired of Superman being reinvented every so often. The whole superhero genre needs to take a break. Disney has slowly destroyed the Marvel Universe, and W/B has just about made a mockery of DC.

reply

Superhero movies are great entertainment, but maybe you should stop watching them, because it sounds like you need to take a long break from superhero movies.

reply

reboots are lazy entertainment. Man of steel was one of the biggest pieces of shit I’ve ever had to watch

reply

Nothing you said is true, but I respect your opinion. You may be experiencing superhero fatigue. If you are feeling burnt out, I recommend you stop watching superhero movies immediately!

reply

This will in fact be the 7th SUPERMAN movie made. Still to this day, no one beats Christopher Reeve

reply

It depends how you count them. Reeves made 4, then there was Superman Returns. After that came 3 films that heavily featured Cavill's Superman, though one was technically about the entire Justice League. I don't think it's unreasonable to say there have been 8, but only 2 or 3 or them have been any good.

reply

don’t forget superman and the mole-men

reply

Can we add the Richard Donner director's cut of Superman 2?

reply

I stopped watching most superhero movies years ago for that reason especially Spiderman who is repeatedly rebooted. I only watch a superhero movie if it has something fresh to offer.

Companies want to make money so they'll flood theaters with superhero movies. Just don't watch most of them.

reply

The issue is that now the "movie marketplace" is worldwide. Multi-milliions of people. A good number of them will ALWAYS come out for Superman. (More come out for Batman -- it seems established over the years that Batman is more "cool" -- almost like James Bond if Robin is left out of it. )

But they will keep making them until people stop watching them.

Which will be never.

And remember: the late Walt Disney sent out his movies in re-release every 7 years: long enough for a new generation of little kids to grow to movie-going age. So making a new Superman every 7 years or so(or more?) serves the same purpose.

PS. In some ways -- but not all -- the first Superman (1978) is still the best. "The beginning of the super-hero movie." With (at the time) "the greatest actor in the history of movies in it." That was Marlon Brando. Nobody remembers Brando much now except as the very fat, rather crazy, somewhat stupid man he revealed himself to be at the end. But THEN? Superman got the greatest movie star of all time in it. (Jack Nicholson as the Joker in the first Batman was hired for much the same symbolic reasons.)

All these years later, "superstar villains" who suck up the budget are no longer required. No Brando, no Nicholson, no Jim Carrey, no Arnold. (And no Gene Hackman. The Best Actor Oscar winner who first played Lex Luthor, with hair most of the time.) Simple "good actors" do the work of villainy (Willem Dafoe, Alfred Holina for Marvel, Jesse Eisenberg, Michael Shannon for DC) I suppose Kevin Spacey was the last "major star" to play Lex Luthor.

Oh: the big mistake in Superman 1978? Ned Beatty as Luthor's bumbling idiot sidekick, "Otis." What were they thinking? Beatty -- a fine serious actor in Deliverance and Network...reduced to a silly kiddie-show idea of villainy..undercutting Gene Hackman all the way through.

reply

But you don't have to watch them. There are plenty of other movies to see. I literally tune-out the noise aka: Superhero movie releases most of the time. I groaned when I heard about this reboot, but now I'm onboard after watching the trailer.

Brando was hired in order to get financing for the film. They wanted a big name for Superman too, but changed their minds when they realized a famous actor in tights as Superman would be a credibility issue. Young Brando lead a new realistic acting style that was unheard of before him. That 50s audience must have been shocked by his raw performance in A Streetcar Named Desire. If you watch it, you'll notice his costars using an older more common acting style.

I watched Superman 1978 in the movie theater with my friends. It was a great popcorn movie. The audience was lively and cheered. Best time I ever had in a movie theater.

Disney (and other studios) re-released movies every few years because that was the only way to see them since VCRs hadn't been invented yet. They could make extra money when the next generation of kiddies came of age to watch them like me. I watched a bunch of movies like that when I was a kid.

reply

It feels a little refreshing to me, as the recent run of Superman films were completely ignorable and forgettable, and seemed almost to be about a different character. It's like we're FINALLY getting another Superman movie.

reply

Showing the Man of Steel bleeding from the nose & mouth in the opening of that trailer overly humanizes him

reply

I'm a huge DC guy, but other than The Batman II and Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow there's nothing currently on the horizon that really interests me. The only interest I have in this Superman movie is that it introduces Supergirl and Hawkgirl.

reply

Superhero movies have run their course. They're a dead genre. Time to move on and grow up. Grownup books don't have pictures.

reply

Superheroes are really for children - not adults.

reply

[deleted]

They're milking a cow that's running out of milk.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah I don't mind an occasional reboot. But I'm past the point of being interested in another Superman or Spiderman reboot (to use an obvious example from each of the two industries).

Though the reboots are inevitable due to actors aging, contract disputes, a completed cycle of stories, and because new generations of kids will constantly come along who aren't familiar with the older iterations, so it will be new for them.

I think Christopher Reeves was the best Superman, though the special effects are horribly dated in those films. I've intensely disliked the rest of the Superman films. This one might be good, but I'm past the point of caring about Superman.

Here's hoping for the Superman fans that this one turns out well and they enjoy it.

reply

Very true. I failed to be as clear as you regarding the reasons. Aging, contracts, and new generations do keep these reboots going. I understand and actually agree with those reasons, and I hope the new fans enjoy. I'll take my niece to see it, but I'm not enthusiastic.

Good point bringing up Spiderman. His reboots have worn me out, too.

reply