this looks terrible


at best

reply

Looks big, dumb, and fun.

Roland Emmerich loves destroying the planet.

reply

And we love destroying Roland Emmerich's reputation as a filmmaker.

reply

it is...

reply

thanks for the excruciating amount of detail.
in addition to all that detail, perhaps you could fill in exactly what "Looks Terrible" to you?

are the effects terrible?
are the sets terrible?
is the lighting terrible?
did the story sound terrible?
is the acting terrible?
perhaps the sound was terrible?

could it be that a movie that is not of interest to you at all, is called terrible? if so, that is an odd way relate to movies. surely, there are many other movies in existence that don't interest you particularly, that have to be labeled terrible, and yet they are extremely good to other people.

movies are totally subjective, unless, of course there are facts behind it, lets say, the film had no budget and the sets were badly spray painted cardboard because of the no budget, we could all agree that, yes, it looks terrible to one and all.

with zero detail, your post is just like your review: terrible

reply

Detail:

The entire film is terrible.

reply

I watched it. And it is indeed terrible, contender for the worst of the year already.

Not even so bad it's good. Not even in the big, dumb, enjoyable, mindless fun category.

YouTube reviewers are growing to have an absolute ball with this one.

reply

is that you, elmacho? :D

reply

No, I've actually seen it but I think OP was working on a hunch - either way they are correct.

reply

meh... it was okay, just another cookie cutter Emmerich film... and it was really cool in IMAX. forgettable, interesting sci-fi action

reply