Once again it's useless to apply logic to a time travel show since there is no such thing as backwards time travel.
i don't agree with you, even a little bit.
Point 1.. no; most physicists actually believe time-travel is, at least in THEORY, possible:
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/12/07/physicists-send-particles-of-light-into-the-past-proving-time-travel-is-possible/Here's this quote from Stephen Hawking:
http://www.hawking.org.uk/space-and-time-warps.htmlWe thus have experimental evidence from the bending of light, that space-time is curved, and confirmation from the Casimir effect, that we can warp it in the negative direction. So it might seem possible, that as we advance in science and technology, we might be able to construct a wormhole, or warp space and time in some other way, so as to be able to travel into our past.
(Tho he DOES go on to say it will probably never happen because known history has no record of a confirmed future time-traveler)
This show didn't invent the idea of a "closed timelike curve", it's a legitimate scientific theory, that addresses how time travel
might work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curveA closed timelike curve can be created if a series of such light cones are set up so as to loop back on themselves, so it would be possible for an object to move around this loop and return to the same place and time that it started.... the object's future light cone would include spacetime points both forwards and backwards in time, and so it should be possible for the object to engage in time travel under these conditions.
There are even scientists who believe paradoxes simply CANNOT be created; so no cause for worry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novikov_self-consistency_principlePhysicists have long known that some solutions to the theory of general relativity contain closed timelike curves -— for example the Gödel metric. Novikov discussed the possibility of closed timelike curves (CTCs) in books he wrote in 1975 and 1983, offering the opinion that only self-consistent trips back in time would be permitted.
Novikof, obviously, believed history canNOT be changed. However, his whole theorem is based around the idea that time travel IS theoretically possible.
Indeed there is no such thing as "time". It's an illusion. It's simply how we human beings track the number of revolutions the earth makes, and how many times it travels around the sun. There is only the now.
Even this, I don't agree with. The timeline in its entirely, ALL exists. Every past moment, every future moment, will happen & has already happened and even now IS happening--- because they impact each other. Man is only capable of SEEING 'the now'--- indeed, we can't see the past, our memories are just unreliable mental images we've created of of moments that were, at the time, PRESENT moments. We can't actually look at a door and see someone walk thru it yesterday, or tomorrow. But they are there-- we're just denied the awareness of them.
Point 2-- Even if it's not practically possible, that doesn't matter. Magic isn't possible, either, and yet the Harry Potter series has a storyline that uses spells "logically." Same with superpowers; Spiderman, the Avengers or the X-men don't seem to have a significant gaps in the logic of how they use their powers. Why should a "fictional" time-travel story be any different, and not be expected to adhere to its own internal logic?
Sometimes fires don't go out when you're done playin' with them.
reply
share