I absolutely love this show. I'm in the states so I'm only in episode four but this has become my new happy show. Every show makes me smile and crack up.
I love the family. No, they're not perfect but that's kind of the point. What family is perfect? Also, if you gave up after two episodes, you're totally missing the point of the evolution of the characters and how Corfu changes them.
I found the moments between Leslie and Louisa during episode four particularly moving. Oh and to comment on another post about Leslie's socks: he's adorable, leave him be. Lol "Best son!"
I didn't read the books but I know the stories. I think this show still works, even if it deviates. But maybe that's just me, a show can't please everyone. We're all unique creatures with individual tastes.
I am enjoying the show but I am irritated by the self-absorption of each of the family characters. The mother is ok, but gets no respect from her children. Lawrence thinks he is above his company because he is a writer, and is oblivious to the concerns of his mother. As the eldest in the family, he is the polar opposite of a John Boy Walton. I hate when he speculates about his mother's sexual frustration (creepy!) then sets her up with that old drunk. Leslie is a brainless gun nut. He walks around looking blank and aimless. Louisa is only interested in boyfriends and fashion. The little boy supposedly loves animals but locks them up in cages. So these characters are not easy to like. Yet they are probably more real than say the Downton Abbey folks. That show tried to appease modern audiences by making the characters take on more modern sensibilities. In this show, the characters are more typical for their day and age as a British educated class family. Girls, like Louisa, received a parlour-conversation level education, then were expected to flirt around to find a husband. Boys and young men were given free reign to indulge in their interests, such as writing, hunting, science.
I am on ep. 4 too, and am hoping that this family is evolving. The scenes with Louisa and Leslie and Louisa giving her mother the dress show hope. Small signs that this family might have started out in a bad, disconnected place but are moving toward becoming a more caring and loving family.
Just a small note, Margo is the daughter. Louisa is the mother.
But yea, I really felt at the end of the episode that the family is starting to congeal. There's only two episodes left in the season so I'm hoping they continue on this path.
As for Gerry and his animals. I'm wondering if they'll address the cage thing cos in real life Gerry was a naturalist. He believed in observing animals in their own habitat so maybe he will have a revelation of some sort.
He worked as an animal collector for zoos for some years, he wrote several popular books about his animal collecting adventures. and he eventually had his own zoo on Jersey, which is still there. He had nothing against zoos if they were properly run, believing they played an important part in preserving endangered species. He was of the opinion that caged animals were not necessarily unhappy, if they were properly housed and looked after. but the only creatures he kept on Corfu that were caged that I can remember are the magenpies.
I hate it because it totally distorts the characters and how they were in the books. and the Durrells were real people, not fictional characters. Gerald Durrell may have exaggerated their characters a bit for comic affect in his wonderful books, but changing them so much the way this series does is really annoying. and in particular I was infuriated by the outrageous claim that Theodore Stephanides was not a real doctor. I'm surprised the makes of this series haven't been sued for libel or something for claiming that.
I didn't read the book(s), so I can enjoy this show for its own merits. And I do enjoy it immensely. The characters are all beautifully drawn, warts and all. The locations are beautiful, and the natives all seem to be warm, wonderful people, even the grumpy housekeeper.
I often find myself to be a harsh critic of TV shows and I wouldn't change a thing about this charming little show. It's a jewel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and YOU ... WILL ... ATONE!
Agree, it's a terrific follow up to the original BBC series of the 80's. Well written, brilliantly acted, and cinematic in its direction. And shot on location. Can't do much about the cynics. Maybe if there were zombies in it.
Hey, don't be dissing zombie shows, I like them, too!
I just finished watching the show, and I thought it was terrific, even though there was a rather unexpected twist in the last episode. I can't wait to see what season two brings the Durrell family!
For those overly concerned about the historical correctness about the show, understand the books didn't entirely reflect reality either. Literary license.....
"Durrell fictionalised this period of his sojourn on Corfu in the lyrical novel Prospero's Cell. His younger brother Gerald Durrell, who became a naturalist, published his own version in his memoir My Family and Other Animals (1954), and the following two books of Gerald's so-called Corfu Trilogy, published in 1969 and 1978. Gerald describes Lawrence as living permanently with his mother and siblings—his wife Nancy is not mentioned at all. Lawrence, in his turn, refers only briefly to his brother Leslie, and he does not mention that his mother and two other siblings were also living on Corfu in those years. The accounts cover a few of the same topics; for example, both Gerald and Lawrence describe the roles played in their lives by the Corfiot taxi driver Spiro Amerikanos and the Greek doctor and poet Theodore Stephanides. In Corfu Lawrence became friends with Marie Aspioti, with whom he cooperated in the publication of Lear's Corfu"
Huh? So, what's so "historically correct" about having your own version of things? It's NOT literary license. The brothers just recalled their time on Corfu through different lenses. Doesn't make it necessarily incorrect or fictional.
The family described in "My Family and Other Animals" was a chalk outline. This show attempts to take the actual story of the family, gathered from multiple sources, and accurately represent it, while also throwing in some modern sensibilities.
It might be ACCURATE that Gerald's mother was little more than a depressed maid, but that's no kind of role model for young people these days. It does us no good to enforce bad examples in our entertainment, in the name of accuracy.
The show follows the tradition that the heart of the family is the mother, and if there is a downside to the ITV adaptation it's that they can't show that a mother isn't 100% necessary for a happy family. Baby steps.
The character of Gerald's brothers seems perfect, and completely in fitting with both the books and the extensive biography available.
Ultimately it's a Sunday, early-evening light entertainment show on ITV with the intention to entertain. An accurate portrayal of the family's life would be profoundly depressing. Why would anyone want that?
Absolutely my favourite ITV show this year, and for the first time in ages that isn't a sarcastic award.
I like the show but I can see where the criticism comes from. Except for the mother all the kids are extremely self-absorbed and selfish, whiny, weak and act highty mighty when they really don't have a valid reason for it.
Yes, maybe sometimes. But except for Larry, none of them is an adult yet. Gerry is only eleven years old, and Leslie and Margo are still just teenagers. So they would still have some maturing to do at this point.
Hm, I have just seen the interesting episodes about Leslie finding out that he got an ex-girlfriend pregnant before they broke up. Either way, it is clear that Leslie still wasn't mature enough to be a father. He seems to do what he can about the situation though, and I have to like that he's joined the local police.
Agree with you -- it's a superbly entertaining series. So funny and the stories are so well-written. You never know where they're going with it. Great acting by Keeley Hawes and all the rest are excellent as well. Love the animation too.
Okay, I've never written a hate post about this show, this is probably my first Moviechat post about the show at all.
But the fact is that I read Gerald Durrell's hilarious books about a bazillion times when I was in my teens, and I found the TV show a crushing disappointment by comparison. The charm and hilarity of the books just didn't make the transition.