MovieChat Forums > The Meg (2018) Discussion > Ruby Rose

Ruby Rose

posted 7 years ago by Saenzwa9 (505)
22 replies | jump to latest

Is the only reason I would consider seeing this. Is she a supporting character with significant screen time or more of a glorified cameo? I don't wanna pay $15.00 then watch her get killed after 5 minutes

[–] melholden (96) 6 years ago

She's hot looking, but nothing about her performance indicated she's a good/great actress. Many of her scenes were just a look at the emotional state she was in at the moment.

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Supporting. Which is good. Because she has no acting skills at all.

[–] HarrySkywalker (745) a year ago

You mean the actress filled with tattoos?

It looks absolutely disgusting.

Does she have all those tattoos in real life or was only for her character?

[–] DoctorThirteen (15297) a year ago

Pretty sure she's well-tatted IRL.

[–] HarrySkywalker (745) a year ago

She looks bloody awful.