MovieChat Forums > Legend (2015) Discussion > Hardy, a good or poor actor?

Hardy, a good or poor actor?


Although I believed they were 2 different actors, so playing twins worked to that extent, I felt the performances were really different. As Reggie, he acted very well, as Ron he was awful, so over the top it was comical. Had he just played that role I would have said he is a poor actor. And according to this film, older brother Charlie never existed! I was looking at my watch after 30 minutes and regularly thereafter. A terrible film.

reply

Think all the cast a bit wasted in this.


Don't be late, don't hesitate, this dream can pass just as fast as lightning.

reply

havent seen the film yet, but Tom Hardy is a very good actor and often the main characters in films and tv shows arent really the most interisting ones, often the supporting characters are much more interesting and thats probably why alot of supporting actors are much better actors then the main ones while they still have better looks and something like that and are more made to be the main men or women, and thats also why alot of the time the supporting actors steal the films but also thats often the case in big hollywood pop-corn flicks.

reply

Tom Hardy was the best part of this film and the only reason I made it to the end honestly.

reply

[deleted]

good actor but hate watching him (Bronson was good tough) I cannot understand half of what the dumb fer says. It was not the mask on Bane!!! Whys doesn't the sound man notice half of the audience cannot decipher his speech, I raised the volume and went back over some lines of dialogue and still no clue what the dumb SOB said

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

He played two version of himself in this one himself (Tom Hardy) two over the top himself(over the top Tom Hardy)

reply