Scarlett Johansson's Fat ass
is getting too old for this role, can we get some young sexy replacement asap???
shareis getting too old for this role, can we get some young sexy replacement asap???
shareFirst: she's a phenomenal actress and she owns action roles hard.
Second: we live in a world where Scorsese got De Niro, Pesci, Pacino, et al. to play about seven different ages throughout the course of The Irishman. No reason the (still youthful) Johansson can't work a prequel.
Third: if you think Johansson isn't still a bombshell, your standards are absurdly high.
First: she can't act, she plays herself in every role
Second: YOU live in a world of CGI De niro, Pesci and Pacino, i Don't, i hated that rubbish irishman, scorsese has been putting out pure shit for a while.
Third: Johanson is not as hot as you might think 80% of hollywood actresses are hotter
I disagree with you most on her performative capabilities. Match Point, Lost in Translation, Her, Under the Skin - she's got a BUNCH that I love for their nuance and truth.
I don't know what you mean when you say she's "playing herself". What does that mean? Can you define it for me? I want to understand...
There are a lot of people who couldn't get over the CG de-aging in the Irishman - fair enough. But Scorsese's output is still strong. Silence was brilliant. Even calling something like Hugo "pure shit" is an overstatement surely?
As to the third point, to each his or her own. I happen to think Scarlett's extremely good looking.
I'll add this into the mix: I think that she's certainly talented enough to play the role she's been playing for the past decade or so. Why swap her now when they *finally* decide to give Black Widow her own film?
sorry to be diametrically opposed to you on every point here man. scarlett play herself means that every role she plays she is playing the same role (herself), scorcese hasnt done a good movie since casino i think, hugo was PURE hollywood plastic sellout rubbish.
if you like her good for you, i demand a replacement with fresh meat, enough of the scarlett era, she can play mom roles from now on, good for her
No need to be sorry for it! 'tis your opinion, sir!
I'm still not sure what you mean. Her character in Match Point is not played the same way she approaches Black Widow or Charlotte, and she's vastly different in Under the Skin. Each one has, for instance, a different level of confidence. Black Widow and Under the Skin are both more physically-oriented roles. Charlotte is played repressed, but curious and "waking up" over the course of the movie. Her physicality is different, her mannerisms, how she carries herself.
What elements are the same?
Casino's underrated, and you don't like Gangs of New York? That's one of my top Scorsese films, close to Silence, which I think is one of the most underrated films of all time and was SNUBBED at the Academy Awards for not even having a nomination. It's a superlative film.
If you're sick of her, fine, I just don't see the need to chuck her for a character she built and established within this universe. I don't see her as past her prime at all.
Reading thru this exchange, it’s obvious Ace’s opinion is the correct one and einstein is just trolling.
shareAfter seeing her in Under the skin, I've lost any and all interest in her.
shareplease explain?
shareSaggy Tits :(
shareok :(
shareYou pretty much knew that was going to happen... any woman with titties that big isn't going to have perky puppies forever and by their 30's will start heading toward knee-knockers. If she wanted to be taken seriously she would have done what Jennifer Connelly did and get her tits reduced to a size that gravity wouldn't be so fond of.
shareNatalie Portman is still a bombshell for me even over Scarlett still be 40 when Love and Thunder hits theatres
shareIf that is your personal taste, then I wish you well. But I still think Scarlett still has remarkably good looks, and I think it strange that people on these boards come on and tear her down as though she were homely or had become a grotesque simply because she doesn't look as she did twelve years ago.
I don't say that this is the case, but it always has the appearance of people who have calibrated their standards for beauty and sexuality based on Hollywood (or perhaps pornography) instead of recognising the "real" world. They wind up obsessed with a narrow band of women, a very specific body type, the absolute exemplars of that type, and (most tellingly) seem obsessed with youth and refuse to recognise beauty on the other side of twenty-five.
Ah, the follies of youth...
shareFat (or full) butts are the in thing, some women with no arse are going down to Mexico to get implants....saying"Make mine look like Scarlett Johansson in the Avengers!"
And I saw a show where some dumb fool thought it would be better to be blind so she had her eyes fucked up with sodium hydroxide so she would be blind... Just because some idiots do stupid things doesn't mean its a good idea. Big asses are a stupid idea where apparently some stupid women heard Sir-Mix-a-Lot's song and didn't realize it was a joke.
share