As a psychologist, I wonder if you (as the filmmakers) considered that individuals tend to have a flight/flight tendency when faced with high risk situations. This means it is likely that instead of debating gay/immigrant/ethnicity issues, we would more likely see people crying, begging, screaming, angry, running, panicking or praying. While the movie does portray this initially, it seems that most people very quickly work out some logical 'game rules' and then start calmly and almost manipulatively moving forward into debates and conversations.
For example, take the HR woman - bragging about her education and rambling about her cats etc. She is facing almost imminent death and yet has the presence to run off a spiel that was trivial under the circumstances. Very odd behaviour indeed.
At other points in the movie, people are conversing while someone nearby drops dead, and they actually pick up their conversation where it left off - seemingly without missing a beat. Granted these are surreal circumstances, but these people have been in a room for 10 minutes or less and just a short while ago they were happily driving to the grocery store or to visit friends etc. It is unrealistic to suggest that in this short time frame, they have somehow transformed into callous sociopaths.
While people cannot maintain high levels of arousal for sustained periods of time, they are unlikely to 'forget' what is at stake and in life/death scenarios, it seems very likely that people would start debating value systems.
Considering this movie depicted an American circle, it crossed my mind that perhaps it is a cultural thing: maybe folks from the US are just silly enough to think that now is a good time to debate illegal immigration. But studies suggest that 'heroes' are likely to emerge from American groups facing life-death scenarios. And I do not mean 'suicide-happy folk'. More like someone making a run for the door or to see where those dead bodies were being dragged off to (i.e., is there a way out or can we break the machine).
The movie bothered me with its inane conversations and the debates were not even interesting: they were largely ignorant in content and seemed to be a transparent attempt by the directors to 'air racist/dogmatic views'. It reminded me a cheap talk show designed to cover controversial issues, but with few intelligent views/facts included.
reply
share