Basement full of water
Did it bother anyone else that the basement had like 4 foot of standing water at all times, and no one seemed to care? That water leak was 10x scarier than the demon.
shareDid it bother anyone else that the basement had like 4 foot of standing water at all times, and no one seemed to care? That water leak was 10x scarier than the demon.
shareI went to school near Green Street. Houses in that area (and in most of London/UK too) do not have basements at all, and certainly not like that large American style one with little windows. Also no family however poor they were would live above a deep pool of water like it's just normal. For a start, North London semi-detached houses are just not built that way, with internal stilts. They have shallow brick foundations.
These were the two most ridiculous things about the film and were completely made up for dramatic effect, along with 99% of the rest of it haha. I'm surprised that an English person involved in making the film would have gone with that representation of the house. Still, I wasn't expecting it to be realistic, it's just corny horror schlock.
I also noticed that the outside of the house was newer looking and in WAY better shape than the inside.
I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!
The basement filled with water was a total distraction. A house with that much standing water underneath would need to be condemned. It's unsanitary, unsafe, and unlivable.
shareThey were poor as *beep* and while they presumably didn't like a basement full of dirty water they didn't exactly have the resources to do anything about it.
shareThey don't need resources to be able to do something about it, it's a council house, so the local council would rehouse them in better accommodation if the house was in the same state as the one portrayed in the movie. There's actually a mistake in the script to do with the house. In the first scene with Peggy Hodgson when she is talking on the telephone she asks 'How am I going to pay my rent this month?', which indicates that the house is rented from the local council, but later in the movie when Ed Warren asks her where the old chair came from, she said her ex-husband bought all the furniture with the house, which indicates that the house was bought privately, which it couldn't have been as the design of the house is a council house design and Local Council's weren't allowed to sell their properties in the 1970's. If the council built it they still owned it. Also, Local Councils don't supply any furniture with their rented properties. Anything left behind by previous occupants is disposed of before the property is re-let. It's a glaring contradiction in the script.
It also amused me greatly that the outside of the house was British sized but the inside was American sized. The inside was about three times bigger than it should have been, although it was explained in the Bluray special features that it was made bigger to make it easier to shoot in. Still, it just looks all wrong if you have actually lived in a British council house.
They weren't THAT poor, the -rented- house may have been in a *beep* state but they had a telephone, and a tv with a remote control, neither of which my family had in 1977 Britain (on a police officer's wage).
I prefer Imaginality to reality.
The mold would kill them faster than any ghosts ever would.
shareThis did annoy me. There was no reason for it or explanation
share