I'd like to hear your opinions on this. My intentions are not to offend atheists. I just want to understand how it works.
By the way, Stephen Hawking is a perfect example of the 'problem of evil' - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_evil - a common hypothesis to why there is no God, I believe.
I find the OP creepy. Hawking is a human before he's atheist. Are there certain categories of people that do not qualify as human by their definition? *shivers down the spine*
Love doesn't come from religion, it is within it sure but religion isn't the reason for people to love. Atheists live normal lives except there's no praying or worshipping or belief in a higher power or powers but we love just the same. Religion doesn't give the ability to love, human nature does
I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear. I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. I am grateful for the gifts of intelligence, love, wonder and laughter. You can?t say it wasn?t interesting. My lifetime?s memories are what I have brought home from the trip. I will require them for eternity no more than that little souvenir of the Eiffel Tower I brought home from Paris.
Basically instead of putting all our love towards something that may not exist and has no power over our lives, we instead choose to focus that love on one another and accept that our time here on earth is a brief inconsequential spec on the fabric of time. Once we are able to accept our place in existence, we then have a greater time living in it. Unfortunately I think religion is merely for the weak minded so you will unfortunately never be able to see the way we do, and its unfortunate for you, but also perhaps better. Ignorance is bliss and I wish that I lent more to the blind faith perception than the slightly nihilistic attitude I have. But despite all that I would give my life to the one I love most in a split second, even committing the cardinal sin of suicide if I had to.
I will respect religious people's beliefs, but only in the same way I tolerate an idiot's.
Great question. It has nothing to do with religion but it is a great question. None of us have looked at this list and decided we have to be unhappy as a result, and many of us have chosen not to blank this out either.
My dog is neither atheist nor religious but I reckon it feels something akin to love for me, my wife and the kids. It certainly looks like it - but we may be kidding ourselves. Does a mother dog love its puppies? Scientists have found in pet's brains the same neurochemicals found in humans when both appear to be experiencing love.
A bunch of people believe in some ludicrous fairy tales making completely unprovable and unfalsifiable claims.. and we're supposed to give their opinions respect?
If people want to believe something simply because they *want* it to be true then fine.
Let them die ignorant.
I choose to live in the question rather than the answer.
If you're not sure what this means, then religion is perfect for you.
A lot of talk here about atheists and the afterlife and metaphysical stuff.
Metaphysical just means outside of what we currently know of the physical world. It means things still to be discovered. It does not necessarily mean God, or heaven, or hell.
Dead means not alive. We have all been not alive before - before we were conceived. Anyone remember that? No? Most atheists would agree that being dead is exactly the same as before being conceived. It is not sitting in eternal darkness thinking 'oh, I wish I had believed in a religion which supports the existence of a happy afterlife'.
'Atheist' means 'without god(s)'. But does it then also mean denying the existence of an afterlife? Do religions have a monopoly on the afterlife? Does an afterlife imply or require the existence of a god or gods? Maybe the afterlife does exist, in a metaphysical plane which we cannot, with current technology or in current theories, perceive, detect or measure - but without a god?
We humans find it difficult - even impossible - to contemplate non-existence (whether preconception or postmortem). We keep thinking, now what would it be like? But even that question is a contradiction. Maybe this difficulty is why we have the tendency to dream up an afterlife.
Most Christians believe in heaven and hell. Good people (as judged by God) go to heaven, and bad people - including non-believers, not matter how they behaved - go to hell, to be eternally tormented according to their sins. Imagine being in heaven, knowing that some people you have known, cared for and about, and loved, are in hell? That would be pretty awful. Or do you forget about them, once you are in heaven?
Time to get back to the real world, and do the washing-up....
Metaphysical just means outside of what we currently know of the physical world. It means things still to be discovered. It does not necessarily mean God, or heaven, or hell.
... 'Atheist' means 'without god(s)'. But does it then also mean denying the existence of an afterlife? Do religions have a monopoly on the afterlife? Does an afterlife imply or require the existence of a god or gods? Maybe the afterlife does exist, in a metaphysical plane which we cannot, with current technology or in current theories, perceive, detect or measure - but without a god?